Developing a prioritisation framework in an English Primary Care Trust

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

Volumn 4, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Wilson, Edward C F ^a   Rees, John ^b   Fordham, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b West Norfolk Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUDGET; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENT; MONEY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 33644837536     PISSN: 14787547     EISSN: 14787547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Department of Health: About us: The Department of Health. 2006 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/AboutUs/fs/en].
2. Mitton C, Donaldson C: "Non-economic" approaches to priority setting. In Priority Setting Toolkit: A guide to the use of economics in healthcare decision making London, UK. BMJ Publishing, 2004:35-45.
3. Cohen DR: Messages from Mid Glamorgan: a multi-programme experiment with marginal analysis. Health Policy 1995, 33:147-55.
4. Edwards D, Peacock S, Carter R: Setting Priorities in South Australian Community Health III: Regional Applications of Program Budgeting and Marginal Analysis. 1998 [http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/ pubs/rr15pdf]. Victoria, Australia: Centre for Health Program Evaluation
5. Bohmer P, Pain C, Watt A, Abernethy P, Sceats J: Maximising health gain within available resources in the New Zealand public health system. Health Policy 2001, 55:37-50.
6. Mauskopf J, Rutten F, Schonfeld W: Cost-effectiveness league tables: valuable guidance for decision makers? Pharmacoeconomics 2003, 21:991-1000.
7. Madden L, Hussey R, Mooney G, Church E: Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice, Health Policy 1995, 33:161-8.
8. Chappel D, Bailey J, Stacy R, Rodgers H, Thomson R: Implementation and evaluation of local-level priority setting for stroke. Public Health 2001, 115:21-9.
9. Scott SN, Lees A: Developing a prioritisation framework: experiences from a Scottish Health Authority. Health Expect 2001, 4:10-7.
10. Mitton C, Donaldson C: Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001, 6:239-48.
11. Mitton CR, Donaldson C: Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PSMA). Health Policy 2003, 64:335-48.
12. Twaddle S, Walker A: Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: application within programmes to assist purchasing in Greater Glasgow Health Board. Health Poricy 1995, 33:91-105.
13. Dodgson J, Spackman M, Pearman A, Phillips L: DTLR multi-criteria analysis manual. 2001 [http://www.odpm.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1142251]. London, UK. National Economic Research Associates
14. Maynard A: Developing the Health Care Market. The Economic Journal 1991, 101:1277-86.
15. Drummond M, Torrance G, Mason J: Cost-effectiveness league tables: more harm than good? Soc Sci Med 1993, 37:33-40.
16. Brinsmead R, Hill S: Use of pharmacoeconomics in prescribing research. Part 4: is cost-utility analysis a useful tool? J Clin Pharm Ther 2003, 28:339-46.
17. Williams A: Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the 'fair innings' argument. Health Econ 1997, 6:117-32.
18. Coast J: The Oregon Plan: technical priority setting in the USA. In Priority Setting. The Health Care Debate Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1996.
19. Holm S: The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ 1998, 317:1000-2.
20. Mullen PM: Quantifying priorities in healthcare: transparency or illusion? Health Serv Manage Res 2004, 17:47-58.