Value of urban views in a bay city: Hedonic analysis with the spatial multilevel additive regression (SMAR) model

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 151, Issue , 2016, Pages 89-102

  Yamagata, Yoshiki ^a   Murakami, Daisuke ^a   Yoshida, Takahiro ^a   Seya, Hajime ^b   Kuroda, Sho ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hedonic analysis; LiDAR data; Spatial multilevel additive model; View; Viewshed analysis

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVES; ANTENNAS; APARTMENT HOUSES; COSTS; OCEANOGRAPHY; OPTICAL RADAR;

ADDITIVE MODELS; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; LIDAR DATA; VIEW; VIEWSHED ANALYSIS;

VISIBILITY;

GIS; GREENSPACE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; LIDAR; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; URBAN PLANNING; VIEWSHED;

HONSHU; JAPAN; KANAGAWA; KANTO; YOKOHAMA;

EID: 84971280035     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adachi S., Kimura F., Kusaka H., Duda M.G., Yamagata Y., Seya H., et al. Moderation of summertime heat-island phenomena via modification of the urban form in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2014, 53(8):1886-1990.
2. Anselin L. Spatial econometrics. Methods and models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
3. Anselin L., Arribas-Bel D. Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence in a single cross-section. Papers in Regional Science 2013, 92(1):3-17.
4. Behrer P. Building in the mountains: a hedonic analysis of the value of degraded mountain views using GIS modeling. Discussion paper 2010-15 2010, Harvard Environmental Economics Program.
5. Benedikt M.L. To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B 1979, 6(1):47-65.
6. Benson E.D., Hansen J.L., Schwartz A.L., Smersh G.T. Pricing residential amenities: the value of a view. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 16(1):55-73.
7. Bhatia S., Chalup S.K., Ostwald M.J. Wayfinding: a method for the empirical evaluation of structural saliency using 3D isovists. Architectural Science Review 2013, 56(3):220-231.
8. Bin O., Crawford T.W., Kruse J.B., Landry C.E. Viewscapes and flood hazard: coastal housing market response to amenities and risk. Land Economics 2008, 84(3):434-448.
9. Bourassa S.C., Hoesli M., Sun J. What's in a view?. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36(8):1427-1450.
10. Brasington D.M., Hite D. Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2005, 35(1):57-82.
11. Brunauer W., Lang S., Umlauf N. Modelling house prices using multilevel structured additive regression. Statistical Modelling 2013, 13(2):95-123.
12. Cavailhès J., Brossard T., Foltête J.-C., Hilal M., Joly D., Tourneux F.-P., et al. GIS-based hedonic pricing of landscape. Environmental and Resource Economics 2009, 44(4):571-590.
13. Chamberlain B.C., Meitner M.J. A route-based visibility analysis for landscape management. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013, 111:13-24.
14. Conroy S., Narwold A., Sandy J. The value of a floor: valuing floor level in high-rise condominiums in San Diego. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 2013, 6(2):197-208.
15. Corrado L., Fingleton B. Where is the economics in spatial econometrics?. Journal of Regional Science 2012, 52(2):210-239.
16. Costanigro M., McCluskey J.J., Mittelhammer R.C. Segmenting the wine market based on price: hedonic regression when different prices mean different products. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2007, 58(3):454-466.
17. Coulson N.E. The empirical content of the linearity-as-repackaging hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics 1989, 25(3):295-309.
18. Domingo-Santos J.M., de Villarán R.F., Rapp-Arrarás I. The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: an algorithm and a GIS tool. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 101(1):52-58.
19. Dong G., Harris R. Spatial autoregressive models for geographically hierarchical data structures. Geographical Analysis 2015, 47(2):173-191.
20. Fisher-Gewirtzman D., Wagner I.A. Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30(1):37-49.
21. Gelfand A.E., Banerjee S., Sirmans C.F., Tu Y., Eng Ong S. Multilevel modeling using spatial processes: application to the Singapore housing market. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2007, 51(7):3567-3579.
22. Handbook of spatial statistics 2010, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton. A.E. Gelfand, P. Diggle, P. Guttorp, M. Fuentes (Eds.).
23. Gibbons S., Overman H.G. Mostly pointless spatial econometrics?. Journal of Regional Science 2012, 52(2):172-191.
24. Grêt-Regamey A., Bishop I.D., Bebi P. Predicting the scenic beauty value of mapped landscape changes in a mountainous region through the use of GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2007, 34(1):50-67.
25. Epple D. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply dunctions for differentiated products. Journal of Political Economy 1987, 95(1):59-80.
26. Hamilton S.E., Morgan A. Integrating lidar, GIS and hedonic price modeling to measure amenity values in urban beach residential property markets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34(2):133-141.
27. Hindsley P., Hamilton S.E., Morgan O.A. Gulf views: toward a better understanding of viewshed scope in hedonic property models. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2013, 47(3):489-505.
28. Jim C.Y., Chen W.Y. Value of scenic views: hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 91(4):226-234.
29. Kanemoto Y. Estimating benefits of infrastructure through the analysis of land value. Discussion paper 1985, 82. The World Bank.
30. Kanemoto Y., Nakamuram R., Yazawa N. Hedonic estimation of the value of environmental quality. Environmental Science 1989, 2(4):251-266. (Japanese).
31. Kei W.S., Wing C.K., Yung Y., Chung C.A.K. Floor-level premiums in high-rise and low-rise buildings. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society 2006.
32. Lake I.R., Lovett A.A., Bateman I.J., Day B. Using GIS and large-scale digital data to implement hedonic pricing studies. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2000, 14(6):521-541.
33. LeSage J.P., Pace R.K. Introduction to spatial econometrics 2009, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
34. Liu L., Jakus M. Hedonic valuation in an urban high-rise housing market. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2015, 63(2):259-273.
35. Llibera M. Extending GIS-based visual analysis the concept of visualscapes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2003, 17(1):25-48.
36. Luttik J. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 48(3-4):161-167.
37. Lynch K. The image of the city 1960, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Lynch K. Managing the sense of regions 1976, MIT Press, Cambridge MA and London.
39. McLeod P.B. The demand for local amenity: an hedonic price analysis. Environment and Planning A 1984, 16(3):389-400.
40. Morello E., Ratti C. A digital image of the city: 3-D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B 2009, 36(5):837-853.
41. Murakami D., Griffith D.A. Random effects specifications in eigenvector spatial filtering: a simulation study. Journal of Geographical Systems 2015, 17(4):311-331.
42. Paterson R.W., Boyle K.J. Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Economics 2002, 78(3):417-425.
43. Poudyal N., Hodges D.G. Realizing the economic value of a forested landscape in a viewshed. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 2010, 34(2):72-78.
44. Ratti C. Urban analysis for environmental prediction. PhD thesis 2002, University of Cambridge.
45. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82(1):34-55.
46. Sander H., Polasky S. The value of views and open space: estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. Land Used Policy 2009, 26(3):837-845.
47. Seya H., Tsutsumi M., Yoshida Y., Kawaguchi Y. Empirical comparison of the various spatial prediction models: in spatial econometrics, spatial statistics, and semiparametric statistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011, 21:120-129.
48. Seya H., Yamagata Y., Tsutsumi M. Automatic selection of a spatial weight matrix in spatial econometrics: application to a spatial hedonic approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2013, 43(3):429-444.
49. Seya H., Murakami D., Tsutsumi M., Yamagata Y. Application of LASSO to the eigenvector selection problem in eigenvector based spatial filtering. Geographical Analysis 2014, 47(3):284-299.
50. Shimizu C., Nishimura K.G., Watanabe T. Housing prices in Tokyo: a comparison of hedonic and repeat-sales measures 2010, Research Center for Price Dynamics Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Japan.
51. Shimizu C., Nishimura K.G., Watanabe T. House prices at different stages in buying/selling process. Research Center for Price Dynamics Working Paper Series 2011, 69.
52. Shoyama K., Managi S., Yamagata Y. Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: a choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:282-293.
53. Teller J. A spherical metric for the field-oriented analysis of complex urban open spaces. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30(3):339-356.
54. Tsutsumi M., Seya H. Hedonic approaches based on spatial econometrics and spatial statistics: application to evaluation of project benefits. Journal of Geographical Systems 2009, 11(4):357-380.
55. Tyrvainen L., Miettinen A. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39(2):205-223.
56. Wheatley D. Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility and its archaeological application. Archaeology and geographic information systems: a European perspective 1995, Taylor and Francis, London. G. Lock, Z. Stancic (Eds.).
57. Wood S.N. Thin plate regression splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 2003, 65(1):95-114.
58. Wood S.N. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, New York.
59. Wood S.N., Scheipl F., Faraway J.J. Straightforward intermediate rank tensor product smoothing in mixed models. Statistics and Computing 2013, 23(3):341-360.
60. Yamagata Y., Murakami D., Seya H., Tsutsumi M. A multilevel model based hedonic analysis of 3D visibility: an empirical case study of Yokohama Baycity. Proceedings of the 13th edition of the International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM2013) 2013.
61. Yamagata Y., Murakami D., Seya H. Latest high-resolution remote sensing and visibility analysis for smart environment design. Remote sensing handbook, Volume III: water resources, disasters, and urban; monitoring, modeling, and mapping: advances over last 50 years and a vision for the future 2015, 24. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
62. Yamagata Y., Seya H. Simulating a future smart city: an integrated land use-energy model. Applied Energy 2013, 112:1466-1474.
63. Yamagata Y., Seya H., Nakamichi K. Creation of future urban environmental scenarios using a geographically explicit land-use model: a case study of Tokyo. Annals of GIS 2013, 19(3):153-168.
64. Yang P.P.-J., Putra S.Y., Li W. Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34(6):971-992.
65. Yasumoto S., Jones A., Yano K., Nakaya T. Virtual city models for assessing environmental equity of access to sunlight: a case study of Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2012, 26(1):1-13.
66. Yu S.-M., Han S.-S., Chai C.-H. Modeling the value of view in high-rise apartments: a 3D GIS approach. Environment and Planning B 2007, 34(1):139-153.