Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction – an essay

Health Economics Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-11

  Klose, K ^a,b   Kreimeier, S ^a   Tangermann, U ^c   Aumann, I ^b   Damm, K ^b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Experiences; Patient reports; Patient reported outcomes PRO; Preference; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; WELLBEING;

EID: 84971201048     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21911991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13561-016-0094-6     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Dirksen CD, Utens CM, Joore MA, van Barneveld TA, Boer B, Dreesens DH, et al. Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study. IS. 2013;8:64. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-64.
2. Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H. Der Stellenwert von Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) im Kontext von Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Köln: DIMDI; 2011.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
4. Lohr KN, Zebrack BJ. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:99–107. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9413-7.
5. Valderas JM, Alonso J. Patient reported outcome measures: a model-based classification system for research and clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1125–35. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9396-4.
6. Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, Leidy NK, Marquis P, Revicki D, Rothman M. Incorporating the Patient's Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6:522–31. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x.
7. Doward LC, Gnanasakthy A, Baker MG. Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim. HQLO. 2010;8:89. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-89.
8. Patrick DL, Guyatt GH, Acquadro C. Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5th ed. 2011.
9. Maloney K, Chaiken BP. An Overview of Outcomes Research and Measurement. JHQ. 1999;21:4–9.
10. Metcalfe R. Compliance, adherence, concordance - what's in a NAME. Pract Neurol. 2005;5:192–3. doi:10.1111/j.1474-7766.2005.00313.x.
11. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
12. Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMS: Putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: King's Fund; 2010.
13. Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, Krabbe PFM, de Charro F. A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol. Value Health. 2014;17:445–53. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.002.
14. Coucill W, Bryan S, Bentham P, Buckley A, Laight A. EQ-5D in patients with dementia: an investigation of inter-rater agreement. Med Care. 2001;39:760–71.
15. Pickard AS, Knight SJ. Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives. Med Care. 2005;43:493–9.
16. Ravens-Sieberer U, Karow A, Barthel D, Klasen F. How to assess quality of life in child and adolescent psychiatry. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014;16:147–58.
17. Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornwell J. Measures of patients' experience in hospital: purpose, methods and uses. London: King's Fund; 2009.
18. Gove PB. Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language, unabridged. Springfield: Merriam-Webster; 2002.
19. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
20. Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology. JAMIA. 1998;5:257–62. doi:10.1136/jamia.1998.0050257.
21. Ruland CM. Improving Patient Outcomes by Including Patient Preferences in Nursing Care. AMIA 1998:448–52.
22. Sacristán JA. Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:6. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-6.
23. Mühlbacher AC, Johnson FR. Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
24. Cleeland CS. Symptom Burden: Multiple Symptoms and Their Impact as Patient-Reported Outcomes. JCNI Monographs, 2007:16–21. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgm005.
25. World Health Organization. How to use the ICF. 2013. http://www.who.int/classifications/drafticfpracticalmanual.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
26. Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J, Sanders L. The challenge of defining wellbeing. JHW. 2012;2:222–35. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i3.4.
27. Diener E, Suh E. Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. SIR. 1997;40:189–216. doi:10.1023/A:1006859511756.
28. Foresight Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project. Mental Capital and Wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century. 2008. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/292453/mental-capital-wellbeing-summary.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
29. Pollard EL, Lee PD. Child well-being: a systematic review of the literature. SIR. 2003;61:59–78. doi:10.1023/A:1021284215801.
30. World Health Organisation. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. 1948. http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html. Accessed 14 May 2016.
31. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2007.
32. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:19–21. doi:10.1136/bmj.f167.
33. Black N, Jenkinson C. How can patients’ views of their care enhance quality improvement? BMJ. 2009;339:202–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2495.
34. Reay N. How to measure patient experience and outcomes to demonstrate quality in care. Nurs Times. 2010;106:12–4.
35. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, Richards N, Chandola T. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:335–9. doi:10.1136/qhc.11.4.335.
36. Tadić V, Hogan A, Ahmed R, Knowles R, Rahi J. Patient Reported Outcomes and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs): Service Users’ Perspectives. 2012. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/childproms/docs/PROM_PREM_FocusGroup_report_Oct2012.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
37. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. HTA. 2002;6:1–244.
38. Cummins RA, Nistico H. Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. JOHS. 2002;3:37–69. doi:10.1023/A:1015678915305.
39. Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright W, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6:247–63. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8.
40. Rademakers J, Delnoij D, de Boer D. Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:326–31. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042358.
41. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient Satisfaction as an Indicator of Quality Care. Inquiry. 1988;25:25–36.
42. Merino-Castelló A. Eliciting Consumers Preferences Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Models. 2003. http://www.econ.upf.edu/docs/papers/downloads/705.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
43. Kjær T. A review of the discrete choice experiment - with emphasis on its application in health care. 2005. http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Om_SDU/Centre/c_ist_sundoke/Forskningsdokumenter/publications/Working%20papers/20051pdf.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2016.
44. Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: A review and classification of the literature. Health Econ. 1998;7:313–26. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<313::AID-HEC350>3.0.CO;2-B.
45. Abu-Assab S. Integration of Preference Analysis Methods into Quality Function Deployment. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag; 2012.
46. Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. EJOR. 1990;48:9–26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
47. Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.
48. Alaszewski A. Using diaries for social research. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006.
49. Sheble L, Wildemuth B. Research diaries. In: Wildemuth BM, editor. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited; 2009. p. 211–21.
50. Dawson J. Measuring Health Status. In: Neale J, editor. Research methods for health and social care. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 181–94.
51. Babbie ER. The practice of social research. 12th ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Cengage; 2010.
52. Brown NR, Williams RL, Barker ET, Galambos NL. Estimating frequencies of emotions and actions: A web-based diary study. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2007;21:259–76. doi:10.1002/acp.1303.
53. Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 2012.
54. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, Moloney TW, McMullen W, Walker JD, Delbanco TL. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff. 1991;10:254–67. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.10.4.254.
55. van der Wal MH, van Veldhuisen DJ, Veeger N, Rutten FH, Jaarsma T. Compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations and outcome in heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1486–93. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq091.
56. Simpson SH, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, Padwal RS, Tsuyuki RT, Varney J, Johnson JA. A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. BMJ. 2006;333:15. doi:10.1136/bmj.38875.675486.55.
57. Carson RT, Hanemann WM. Contingent valuation. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent JR, editors. Handbook of environmental economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2005. p. 821–936.
58. Hoyos D, Mariel P. Contingent valuation: Past, present and future. Prague Economic Papers. 2010;19:329–43. doi:10.18267/j.pep.380.
59. Boyle KJ. Dichotomous-Choice, Contingent-Valuation Questions: Functional form is important. NJARE. 1990;19:125–31.
60. Srinivasan V. A conjunctive-compensatory approach to a self-explication of multiattributed preferences. Decis Sci. 1988;19:295–305. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00268.x.
61. Zahedi F. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces. 1986;16:96–108.
62. Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. J Mark. 1990;54:3–19. doi:10.2307/1251756.
63. Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User's Guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:661–77.
64. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: A Review. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1–30.
65. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D. Health utility estimation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2002;2:99–108. doi:10.1586/14737167.2.2.99.