Evaluation of sidestream darkfield microscopy for real-time imaging acellular dermal matrix revascularization

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 76, Issue , 2016, Pages S255-S259

  DeGeorge, Brent R ^a   Bryce Olenczak, J ^a   Cottler, Patrick S ^a   Drake, David B ^a   Lin, Kant Y ^a   Morgan, Raymond F ^a   Campbell, Christopher A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acellular dermal matrix; Biointegration; Sidestream darkfield microscopy

Indexed keywords

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANGIOGENESIS; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MICROSCOPY; MICROVASCULATURE; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TISSUE EXPANDER; TISSUE EXPANSION; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MICROSCOPY; MICROVESSELS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; TISSUE EXPANSION; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84969972500     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: 15363708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000832     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rohrich RJ. Current concepts in the use of acellular dermal matrices in surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):1S-3S.
2. Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A. Focus on technique: supporting the soft-tissue envelope in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2): 89S-94S.
3. Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A, et al. Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1-10.
4. Alderman A, Gutowski K, Ahuja A, et al. ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:648e-55e.
5. Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD, et al. Regenerative biomaterials: are-view. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:1740-1748.
6. Butler CE, Selber JC. Discussion: the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129: 1059-1060.
7. Clemens MW, Kronowitz SJ. Acellular dermal matrix in irradiated tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction: evidence-based review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):27S-34S.
8. Janis JE, Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):7S-8S.
9. Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. The biologyofbiologics: basic science and clinical concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):9S-17S.
10. Novitsky YW. Biologyofbiological meshes usedin hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:1211-1215.
11. Dunn RM. Cross-linking in biomaterials: a primer for clinicians. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(5 Suppl 2):9S-17S.
12. Yu D, Hanna K, LeGallo R, et al. Abstract 100: comparison of the histological characteristics of ADM capsules to no-ADM breast capsules in ADM-assisted breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(suppl 3):113.
13. Holton LH, Chung T, Silverman RP, et al. Comparison of acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh for lateral chest wall reconstruction in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1238-1246.
14. Nadort A, Woolthuis RG, van Leeuwen TG, et al. Quantitative laser speckle flowmetry of the in vivo microcirculation using sidestream dark field microscopy. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4:2347-2361.
15. Petersen SM, Greisen G, Hyttel-Sorensen S, et al. Sidestream dark field images of the microcirculation: intra-observer reliability and correlation between two semi-quantitative methods for determining flow. BMC Med Imaging. 2014;14:14.
16. Balestra GM, Bezemer R, Boerma EC, et al. Improvement of sidestream darkfield imaging with an image acquisition stabilizer. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:15.
17. Bezemer R, Dobbe JG, Bartels SA, et al. Rapid automatic assessmentofmicrovas-cular density in sidestream dark field images. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011;49: 1269-1278.
18. Salmon ED, Tran P. High-resolution video-enhanced differential interference contrast light microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 2007;81:335-364.
19. Wolf DE. Quantitative video microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 1998;56:117-134. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9500135. Accessed March 13, 2016.
20. Kim JJ, Evans GRD. Applications of biomaterials in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39:359-376.
21. Khor E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Bio-materials. 1997;18:95-105.
22. Chae MP, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, et al. Current evidence for postoperative monitoring of microvascular free flaps: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74: 621-632.
23. Güç E, Fankhauser M, Lund AW, et al. Long-term intravital immunofluorescence imaging of tissue matrix components with epifluorescence and two-photon microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2014.
24. Schenke-Layland K. Non-invasive multiphoton imaging of extracellular matrix structures. J Biophotonics. 2008;1:451-462.
25. Hu S, Maslov K, Wang LV. Second-generation optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy with improved sensitivity and speed. Opt Lett. 2011;36:1134-1136.
26. Hu S, Wang LV. Photoacoustic imaging and characterization of the microvascula-ture. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:011101.
27. Muntean MV, Muntean V, Ardelean F, et al. Dynamic perfusion assessment during perforator flap surgery: an up-to-date. Clujul Med. 2015;88:293-297.
28. Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Zenn MR, et al. The application of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in plastic surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011; 27:355-364.
29. Harless C, Jacobson SR. Current strategies with 2-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2015;4:204-211.
30. Chatterjee A, Krishnan NM, Van Vliet MM, et al. A comparison of free autolo-gous breast reconstruction with and without the use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131: 693e-701e.