Biology of biological meshes used in hernia repair

Surgical Clinics of North America

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1211-1215

  Novitsky, Yuri W ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal wall; Biological mesh; Grafts; Hernia; Surgery

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CROSS LINKING; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; GRAFT INFECTION; HERNIOPLASTY; INFLAMMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL MESH;

ABDOMINAL WALL; BIOLOGICAL MESH; GRAFTS; HERNIA; SURGERY;

ABDOMINAL WALL; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; COLLAGEN; HERNIA, ABDOMINAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 84883746413     PISSN: 00396109     EISSN: 15583171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.014     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Gaertner W.B., Bonsack M.E., Delaney J.P. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. JGastrointest Surg 2007, 11:1275-1285.
2. Cornwell K.G., Landsman A., James K.S. Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2009, 26:507-523.
3. Rosen M.J. Biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction: a critical appraisal. Am Surg 2010, 76:1-6.
4. Jansen P.L., Mertens Pr P., Klinge U., et al. The biology of hernia formation. Surgery 2004, 136:1-4.
5. Jin J., Rosen M.J., Blatnik J., et al. Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes?. JAm Coll Surg 2007, 205:654-660.
6. Sandor M., Xu H., Connor J., et al. Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologicmaterials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 2008, 14:2021-2031.
7. Marreco P.R., da Luz Moreira P., Genari S.C., et al. Effects of different sterilization methods on the morphology, mechanical properties, and cytotoxicity of chitosan membranes used as wound dressings. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004, 71:268-277.
8. Rueter A., Schleicher J.B. Elimination of toxicity from polyvinyl trays after sterilization with ethylene oxide. Appl Microbiol 1969, 18:1057-1059.
9. Khor E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials 1997, 18:95-105.
10. Schmidt C.E., Baier J.M. Acellular vascular tissues: natural biomaterials for tissue repair and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2000, 21:2215-2231.
11. Gouk S.S., Lim T.M., Teoh S.H., et al. Alterations of human acellular tissue matrix by gamma irradiation: histology, biomechanical property, stability, invitro cell repopulation, and remodeling. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008, 84:205-217.
12. Petter-Puchner A.H., Fortelny R.H., Silic K., et al. Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:3245-3252.
13. Butler C.E., Burns N.K., Campbell K.T., et al. Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair. JAm Coll Surg 2010, 211:368-376.
14. Pierce L.M., Rao A., Baumann S.S., et al. Long-term histologic response to synthetic and biologic graft materials implanted in the vagina and abdomen of a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 200:546.e1-546.e8.
15. Orenstein S.B., Qiao Y., Klueh U., et al. Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes invitro. Hernia 2010, 14:401-407.
16. Deeken C.R., Melman L., Jenkins E.D., et al. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. JAm Coll Surg 2011, 212:880-888.
17. Xu H., Wan H., Sandor M., et al. Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 2008, 14:2009-2019.
18. de Castro Bras L.E., Shurey S., Sibbons P.D. Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair. Hernia 2012, 16:77-89.
19. Orenstein S.B., Qiao Y., Kaur M., et al. Human monocyte activation by biologic and biodegradable meshes invitro. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:805-811.
20. Burns N.K., Jaffari M.V., Rios C.N., et al. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 125:167-176.
21. Melman L., Jenkins E.D., Hamilton N.A., et al. Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Hernia 2011, 15:157-164.
22. Rosen M.J., Krpata D.M., Ermlich B., et al. A 5-Year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 2013, 257(6):991-996.