Evaluating the privacy properties of telephone metadata

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 20, 2016, Pages 5536-5541

  Mayer, Jonathan ^a,b   Mutchler, Patrick ^a   Mitchell, John C ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Metadata; Privacy; Social network; Surveillance; Telephone

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLOUD COMPUTING; CROWDSOURCING; EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MOBILE PHONE; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIOLOGY; TELEPHONE; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; PRIVACY; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84969922379     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508081113     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S. Code Sect. 2510(8) (2012).
2. United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 9th Cir. (July 6, 2007).
3. Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S. Code Sect. 2703(c)(2) (2012).
4. USA PATRIOT Act, 50 U.S. Code Sect. 1861 (2012).
5. In re FBI Application, No. BR 13-109, FISA Ct. (August 29, 2013).
6. USA FREEDOM Act, Pub. L. No. 114-23, 129 Stat. 268 (June 2, 2015).
7. December 12, 2013) Liberty and Security in a Changing World (President's Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies, Washington, DC). Available at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2013-12-12-rg-final-report.pdf. Accessed April 2016.
8. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (2014) Report on the Telephone Records Program Conducted Under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and on the Operations of the FISC (Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Washington, DC).
9. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (2015) Recommendations Assessment Report (Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Washington, DC).
10. Retention of Telephone Toll Records, 47 C.F.R. Sect. 42.6 (2015).
11. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393(6684):440-442.
12. Abello J, Pardalos PM, Resende MGC (1998) On maximum clique problems in very large graphs. External Memory Algorithms. DIMACS Workshop: External Algorithms and Visualization, May 20-22 1998, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, eds Abello JM, Vitter JS (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI), pp 119-130.
13. Abello J, Resende MG, Sudarsky S (2002) Massive quasi-clique detection. LATIN 2002: Theoretical Informatics, 5th Latin American Symposium, Cancun, Mexico April 2002 Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed Rajsbaum S (Springer, Berlin), Vol 2286, pp 598-612.
14. Aiello W, Chung F, Lu L (2001) A random graph model for power law graphs. Expo Math 10(1):53-66.
15. Nanavati AA, et al. (2006) On the structural properties of massive telecom call graphs: findings and implications, Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '06, November 5-11, 2006, Arlington, VA (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 435-444.
16. Onnela JP, et al. (2007) Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(18):7332-7336.
17. Pandit V, et al. (2008) Extracting dense communities from telecom call graphs. Third International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware and Workshops, COMSWARE 2008 (IEEE, New York), pp 82-89.
18. Seshadri M, et al. (2008) Mobile call graphs: beyond power-law and lognormal distributions, The 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge, KDD '08, August 24-27, 2008, Las Vegas (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 596-604.
19. Wang P, González MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabási AL (2009) Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses. Science 324(5930):1071-1076.
20. California Online Privacy Protection Act, Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Sect. 22577 (2012).
21. Sweeney L (2002) k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 10(5):557-570.
22. Sweeney L, Abu A, Winn J (2013) Identifying Participants in the Personal Genome Project by Name, Technical Report 1021-1 (Harvard Univ Data Privacy Lab, Cambridge, MA).
23. Golle P, Partridge K (2009) On the anonymity of home/work location pairs. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Springer, Berlin), pp 390-397.
24. Zang H, Bolot J (2011) Anonymization of location data does not work: A large-scale measurement study. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MobiCom '11 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 145-156.
25. De Montjoye YA, Hidalgo CA, Verleysen M, Blondel VD (2013) Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Sci Rep 3:1376.
26. Ohm P (2010) Broken promises of privacy. UCLA Law Rev 57:1701-1777.
27. Krishnamurthy B, Naryshkin K, Wills C (2011) Privacy leakage vs. Protection measures: The growing disconnect. IEEE Secur Priv 11(3):14-20.
28. Mayer JR, Mitchell JC (2012) Third-party web tracking: Policy and technology. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), May, 20-23, 2012, San Francisco (IEEE, New York), pp 413-427.
29. Englehardt S, et al. (2015) Cookies that give you away: The surveillance implications of Web tracking. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '15 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 289-299.
30. Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2008) Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP '08 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), pp 111-125.
31. Backstrom L, Dwork C, Kleinberg J (2007) Wherefore art thou R3579X? Anonymized social networks, hidden patterns, and structural steganography. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 181-190.
32. Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2009) De-anonymizing social networks. 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE, New York), 173-187.
33. Zheng Y, Li Q, Chen Y, Xie X, Ma WY (2008) Understanding mobility based on GPS data. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '08 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 312-321.
34. Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xie X, Ma WY (2009) Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '09 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 791-800.
35. Anagnostopoulos T, Anagnostopoulos C, Hadjiefthymiades S (2012) Efficient location prediction in mobile cellular networks. Int J Wirel Inf Networks 19(2): 97-111.
36. Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2(2):169-194.
37. Zhong E, Tan B, Mo K, Yang Q (2013) User demographics prediction based on mobile data. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9(6):823-837.
38. Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2014) Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW '14 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 831-841.
39. Klayman v. Obama, 957 F. Supp. 2d 1, Dist. Ct. DC (December 16, 2013).
40. Declaration of Professor Edward W. Felten, ACLU v. Clapper, No. 13-cv-03994, Southern Dist. Ct. NY (August 26, 2013).
41. ACLU v. Clapper, 959 F. Supp. 2d 724, Southern Dist. Ct. NY (December 27, 2013).
42. Landau S (2013) Making sense from Snowden. IEEE Secur Priv 11(4):54-63.
43. Blaze M (June 19, 2013) Phew, NSA is just collecting metadata. Wired. Available at www.wired.com/2013/06/phew-it-was-just-metadata-not-think-again.
44. Chittaranjan G, Blom J, Gatica-Perez D (2013) Mining large-scale smartphone data for personality studies. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(3):433-450.
45. De Montjoye YA, Quoidbach J, Robic F, Pentland A (2013) Predicting Personality Using Novel Mobile Phone-Based Metrics. Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction,Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin) Vol 7812, pp 48-55.
46. Arai A, et al. (2014) Understanding user attributes from calling behavior. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, MoMM'14 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 95-104.
47. Jahani E, et al. (2015) Predicting gender from mobile phone metadata, NetMob 2015, April 7-10, 2015, Cambridge, MA, eds Moro E, de Montjoye Y-A, Blondel V, Pentland A, pp 110-113.
48. Toole JL, et al. (2015) Tracking employment shocks using mobile phone data. J R Soc Interface 12(107):pii: 20150185.
49. The Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S. Code Sect. 222 (2012).
50. Customer Proprietary Network Information, 47 C.F.R. Sects. 64.2001-64.2011 (2015).
51. Eagle N, Pentland AS, Lazer D (2009) Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(36):15274-15278.
52. Bogomolov A, Lepri B, Ferron M, Pianesi F, Pentland A (2014) Daily stress recognition from mobile phone data, weather conditions and individual traits. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM'14 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp 477-486.
53. Laurila JK, et al. (2013) From big smartphone data to worldwide research: The mobile data challenge. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 9(6):752-771.
54. Apple (2015) ResearchKit Technical Overview (Apple, Cupertino, CA). Available at researchkit.org/docs/docs/Overview/GuideOverview.html. Accessed April 2015.
55. The White House Office of the Press Secretary (2014) Presidential Policy Directive/PP-28 (The White House, Washington, DC).
56. Dwork C (2006) Differential privacy. Automata, Languages and Programming: 33rd International Colloquium, ICALP 2006, Venice, Italy, July 10-14, 2006, Proceedings, Part II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin), Vol 4052, pp 1-12.
57. Mayer J, Narayanan A (2013) Privacy substitutes. Stanford Law Rev Online 66:89-96.
58. Pew Research Center (2015) The Smartphone Difference (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC), Available at www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-usein-2015. Accessed April 2015.
59. Federal Communications Commission (2014) Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2013 (Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC).
60. Pedregosa F, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825-2830.