Impact of biochar on the anaerobic digestion of citrus peel waste

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 216, Issue , 2016, Pages 142-149

  Fagbohungbe, Michael O ^a   Herbert, Ben M J ^b   Hurst, Lois ^b   Li, Hong ^a   Usmani, Shams Q ^c   Semple, Kirk T ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Stopford Energy and Environment   (United Kingdom)

^c Ariva Technology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biochar; Citrus peel waste; Lag phase; Methane production

Indexed keywords

METHANE;

BIO CHARS; CITRUS PEEL; D-LIMONENE; INHIBITORY EFFECT; LAG PHASE; LAG PHASIS; METHANE PRODUCTION; MICROBIAL IMMOBILIZATION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

LIMONENE; METHANE; BIOCHAR; CHARCOAL; CYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVE; TERPENE; WASTE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREMEDIATION; CHARCOAL; CROP RESIDUE; DIGESTIBILITY; GROWTH CURVE; IMMOBILIZATION; INHIBITION; METHANE; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY;

ABSORPTION LAG TIME; ADSORPTION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; CITRUS; CITRUS PEEL WASTE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; KINETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; WASTE; WASTE DISPOSAL;

CITRUS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BIOREACTORS; CHARCOAL; CITRUS; CYCLOHEXENES; KINETICS; METHANE; REFUSE DISPOSAL; TERPENES; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EID: 84969917127     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.106     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Effect of the clay mineral bentonite on ammonia inhibition of anaerobic thermophilic reactors degrading animal waste. Biodegradation 1992, 3(4):409-414.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C. 20th ed. L.S. Clesceri, A.E. Greenberg, A.D. Eaton (Eds.).
3. Badee A.Z.M., Helmy S.A., Morsy N.F.S. Utilisation of orange peel in the production of α-terpineol by Penicillium digitatum (NRRL 1202). Food Chem. 2011, 126(3):849-854.
4. Bagreev A., Bandosz T.J., Locke D.C. Pore structure and surface chemistry of adsorbents obtained by pyrolysis of sewage sludge-derived fertilizer. Carbon 2001, 39(13):1971-1979.
5. Bertin L., Berselli S., Fava F., Petrangeli-Papini M., Marchetti L. Anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewaters in biofilm reactors packed with granular activated carbon and "Manville" silica beads. Water Res. 2004, 38(14-15):3167-3178.
6. Black C. Particle Fractionation and Particle-size Analysis 1965, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 550-551.
7. Buswell A.M., Mueller H.F. Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1952, 44(3):550-552.
8. Carter J., Barwick V. Good practice guide for isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Network 2011, 1-48.
9. Chang H.C., Oriel P. Bioproduction of perillyl alcohol and related monoterpenes by isolates of Bacillusdetermined by dividing the volume of thestearothermophilus. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59(3):660-662.
10. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(10):4044-4064.
11. Di Pasqua R., Hoskins N., Betts G., Mauriello G. Changes in membrane fatty acids composition of microbial cells induced by addiction of thymol, carvacrol, limonene, cinnamaldehyde, and eugenol in the growing media. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54(7):2745-2749.
12. Di Pasqua R., Betts G., Hoskins N., Edwards M., Ercolini D., Mauriello G. Membrane toxicity of antimicrobial compounds from essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55(12):4863-4870.
13. Droby S., Eick A., Macarisin D., Cohen L., Rafael G., Stange R., McColum G., Dudai N., Nasser A., Wisniewski M., Shapira R. Role of citrus volatiles in host recognition, germination and growth of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 49(3):386-396.
14. Espina L., Somolinos M., Lorán S., Conchello P., García D., Pagán R. Chemical composition of commercial citrus fruit essential oils and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity acting alone or in combined processes. Food Control 2011, 22(6):896-902.
15. FAOSTAT, (2013). <> (accessed 22.02.15). http://faostat3.fao.org/search/citrus%20fruit/E.
16. Foss S., Heyen U., Harder J. Alcaligenes defragrans sp. nov., description of four strains isolated on alkenoic monoterpenes ((+)-menthene, α-pinene, 2-carene, and α-phellandrene) and nitrate. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 21(2):237-244.
17. Glöckner J., Kube M., Shrestha P.M., Weber M., Glöckner F.O., Reinhardt R., Liesack W. Phylogenetic diversity and metagenomics of candidate division OP3. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12(5):1218-1229.
18. Gupta V.K., Ali I., Suhas, Mohan D. Equilibrium uptake and sorption dynamics for the removal of a basic dye (basic red) using low-cost adsorbents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 265(2):257-264.
19. Hale S.E., Endo S., Arp H.P.H., Zimmerman A.R., Cornelissen G. Sorption of the monoterpenes α-pinene and limonene to carbonaceous geosorbents including biochar. Chemosphere 2015, 119:881-888.
20. Huff M.D., Kumar S., Lee J.W. Comparative analysis of pinewood, peanut shell, and bamboo biomass derived biochars produced via hydrothermal conversion and pyrolysis. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 146:303-308.
21. Kadirvelu K., Thamaraiselvi K., Namasivayam C. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from an agricultural solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 76(1):63-65.
22. Kizito S., Wu S., Kipkemoi Kirui W., Lei M., Lu Q., Bah H., Dong R. Evaluation of slow pyrolyzed wood and rice husks biochar for adsorption of ammonium nitrogen from piggery manure anaerobic digestate slurry. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505:102-112.
23. Kuo W.-C., Shu T.-Y. Biological pre-treatment of wastewater containing sulfate using anaerobic immobilized cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 113(1-3):147-155.
24. Laine J., Simoni S., Calles R. Preparation of activated carbon from coconut shell in a small-scale cocurrent flow rotary kiln. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1991, 99:15-23.
25. Li T., Xu J., Zhou L., Wang L., Sun Y., Cheng J., Yuan M., Yue Y., Wang J. Voltammetric determination of the adsorption kinetics of acetic acid on activated carbon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160(9):H568-H572.
26. Martín M.A., Siles J.A., Chica A.F., Martín A. Biomethanization of orange peel waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(23):8993-8999.
27. Martín M.A., Fernández R., Serrano A., Siles J.A. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of orange peel waste and residual glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacturing. Waste Manage. 2013, 33(7):1633-1639.
28. Mattson J.A., Mark H.B., Malbin M.D., Weber W.J., Crittenden J.C. Surface chemistry of active carbon: specific adsorption of phenols. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1969, 31(1):116-130.
29. Mertens D.R., Allen M., Carmany J., Clegg J., Davidowicz A., Drouches M., Frank K., Gambin D., Garkie M., Gildemeister B., Jeffress D., Jeon C.S., Jones D., Kaplan D., Kim G.N., Kobata S., Main D., Moua X., Paul B., Robertson J., Taysom D., Thiex N., Williams J., Wolf M. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85(6):1217-1240.
30. Milan Z., Villa P., Sanchez E., Montalvo S., Borja R., Ilangovan K., Briones R. Effect of natural and modified zeolite addition on anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48(6):263-269.
31. Mizuki E., Akao T., Saruwatari T. Inhibitory effect of Citrus unshu Peel on anaerobic-digestion. Biol. Wastes 1990, 33(3):161-168.
32. Moreno-Castilla C. Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials. Carbon 2004, 42(1):83-94.
33. Mumme J., Srocke F., Heeg K., Werner M. Use of biochars in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164:189-197.
34. Namasivayam C., Radhika R., Suba S. Uptake of dyes by a promising locally available agricultural solid waste: coir pith. Waste Manage. 2001, 21(4):381-387.
35. Otero M., Lobato A., Cuetos M.J., Sánchez M.E., Gómez X. Digestion of cattle manure: thermogravimetric kinetic analysis for the evaluation of organic matter conversion. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(3):3404-3410.
36. Palatsi J., Affes R., Fernandez B., Pereira M.A., Alves M.M., Flotats X. Influence of adsorption and anaerobic granular sludge characteristics on long chain fatty acids inhibition process. Water Res. 2012, 46(16):5268-5278.
37. Qadeer R., Hanif J., Saleem M., Afzal M. Characterization of activated-charcoal. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 1994, 16(4):229-235.
38. Rao M.M., Reddy D.H.K.K., Venkateswarlu P., Seshaiah K. Removal of mercury from aqueous solutions using activated carbon prepared from agricultural by-product/waste. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(1):634-643.
39. Raposo F., Fernandez-Cegri V., De la Rubia M.A., Borja R., Beline F., Cavinato C., Demirer G., Fernandez B., Fernandez-Polanco M., Frigon J.C., Ganesh R., Kaparaju P., Koubova J., Mendez R., Menin G., Peene A., Scherer P., Torrijos M., Uellendahl H., Wierinck I., de Wildep V. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86(8):1088-1098.
40. Schink B. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 61(2):262-280.
41. Serrano A., Ángel Siles López J., Chica A.F., Martin M., Karouach F., Mesfioui A., El Bari H. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and orange peel waste. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35(7):898-906.
42. Stams A.J. Metabolic interactions between anaerobic bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1994, 66(1-3):271-294.
43. Syaichurrozi I., Budiyono, Sumardiono S. Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149:390-397.
44. Tada C., Yang Y., Hanaoka T., Sonoda A., Ooi K., Sawayama S. Effect of natural zeolite on methane production for anaerobic digestion of ammonium rich organic sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96(4):459-464.
45. Torri C., Fabbri D. Biochar enables anaerobic digestion of aqueous phase from intermediate pyrolysis of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 172:335-341.
46. Vickers C.E., Possell M., Cojocariu C.I., Velikova V.B., Laothawornkitkul J., Ryan A., Mullineaux P.M., Nicholas Hewitt C. Isoprene synthesis protects transgenic tobacco plants from oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32(5):520-531.
47. Walker M., Zhang Y., Heaven S., Banks C. Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(24):6339-6346.
48. Watanabe R., Tada C., Baba Y., Fukuda Y., Nakai Y. Enhancing methane production during the anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol using Japanese cedar charcoal. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 150:387-392.
49. Zabaniotou A., Stavropoulos G., Skoulou V. Activated carbon from olive kernels in a two-stage process: industrial improvement. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(2):320-326.
50. Zhang Y., Banks C.J., Heaven S. Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:168-178.
51. Zhu B., Gikas P., Zhang R., Lord J., Jenkins B., Li X. Characteristics and biogas production potential of municipal solid wastes pretreated with a rotary drum reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(3):1122-1129.
52. Zwietering M., Jongenburger I., Rombouts F., Van't Riet K. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56(6):1875-1881.