Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: Biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 149, Issue , 2013, Pages 390-397

  Syaichurrozi, Iqbal ^a   Budiyono, ^a   Sumardiono, Siswo ^a  

^a DIPONEGORO UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Biodegradability organic materials; Biogas; COD N ratio; Kinetic model; Vinasse

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; KINETIC PARAMETERS; KINETIC THEORY; UREA;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; BIOGAS FERMENTATION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; COD/N RATIOS; CONTROL VARIABLE; KINETIC MODELING; ORGANIC MATERIALS; VINASSES;

BIOGAS;

AMMONIA; BIOGAS; NITROGEN; POLYETHYLENE; UREA;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; BIOGAS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FERMENTATION; UREA;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; INOCULATION; KINETICS; METHANOGENIC BACTERIUM; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROOM TEMPERATURE; STOICHIOMETRY; VINASSE; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL;

BIODEGRADABILITY ORGANIC MATERIALS; BIOGAS; COD/N RATIO; KINETIC MODEL; VINASSE;

AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOFUELS; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; KINETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EID: 84885460372     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.088     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adiga S., Ramya R., Shankar B.B., Patil J.H., Geetha C.R. Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth, poultry litter, cow manure and primary sludge: a comparative study. Int. Conf. Biotechnol. Environ. Manag. 2012, 14(2):73-78.
2. Brannen A.L., Davidson P.M. Antimicrobial in Foods 1993, Marcel Dekker, New York. 2nd ed.
3. Budiyono, Widiasa I.N., Johari S., Sunarso The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. Int. J. Chem. Biol. Eng. 2010, 3(1):39-44.
4. Budiyono, Widiasa I.N., Johari S., Sunarso Increasing biogas production rate from cattle manure using rumen fluid as inoculums. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. IJBAS-IJENS 2010, 10(1):68-75.
5. Budiyono B., Syaichurrozi I., Sumardiono S. Biogas production from bioethanol waste: the effect of pH and urea addition to biogas production rate. Waste Technol. 2013, 1(1):1-5.
6. Buitron G., Carvajal C. Biohydrogen production from tequila vinasse in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effect of initial substrate concentration, temperature, and hydraulic retention time. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9071-9077.
7. Cortez L.A.B., Perez L.E.B. Experiences on vinasse disposal part III: combustion of vinasse-# 6 fuel oil emulsions. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 1997, 14(1).
8. Deerr N. Cane Sugar: The Text Book on the Agriculture of the Sugar Cane, The Manufacture of Sugar Cane, and The Analysis of Sugar House Products, Together with a Chapter on the Fermentation of Molasses 1911, Norman Rodger, London.
9. Deublein D., Steinhauser A. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources 2008, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim.
10. Elaiyaraju P., Partha N. Biogas production from co-digestion of orange peel waste and Jatropha de-oiled cake in an anaerobic batch reactor. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11(14):3339-3345.
11. Elbeshbishy E., Nakhla G. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of proteins and carbohydrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 116:170-178.
12. Espinoza-Escalante F.M., Pelayo-Ortiz C., Navarro-Corona J., Gonzalez-Garcia Y., Bories A., Gutierrez-Pulido H. Anaerobic digestion of the vinasses from the fermentation of Agave tequilana Weber to tequila: the effect of pH, temperature and hydraulic retention time on the production of hydrogen and methane. J. Biomass Bioenerg. 2009, 33:14-20.
13. Garcia-Garcia I., Bonilla-Venceslada J.L., Jimenez-Pena P.R., Ramos-Gomez E. Biodegradation of phenol compounds in vinasse using Aspergillus terreus and Geotrichum candidum. War. Res. 1997, 31(8):2005-2011.
14. Jimenez A.M., Borja R., Martin A., Raposo F. Mathematical modelling of aerobic degradation of vinasses with Penicillium decumbens. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:2805-2811.
15. Linke B. Kinetic study of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of solid wastes from potato processing. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30:892-896.
16. Lutoslawki K., Ryznar-Luty A., Cibis E., Krzywonos M., Miskiewicz T. Biodegradation of beet molasses vinasse by a mixed culture of microorganisms: effect of aeration conditions and pH control. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23(11):1823-1830.
17. Martin M.A., Raposo F., Borja R., Martin A. Kinetic study of the anaerobic digestion of vinasse pretreated with ozone, ozone plus ultraviolet light, and ozone plus ultraviolet light in the presence of titanium dioxide. Process Biochem. 2002, 37:699-706.
18. Niu Q., Qiao W., Qiang H., Hojo T., Li Y.Y. Mesophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure at a wide range of ammonia concentration: stability, inhibition and recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137:358-367.
19. Niu Q., Qiao W., Qiang H., Li Y.Y. Microbial community shifts and biogas conversion computation during steady, inhibited and recovered stages of thermophilic methane fermentation on chicken manure with a wide variation of ammonia. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146:223-233.
20. Nopharatana, A., Pullammanappallil, P.C., Clarke, W.P., 2006. Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. <> (On line, Juny 12, 2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X06001346.
21. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hagerdal B.H. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. J. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:17-24.
22. Phang S.M., Miah M.S., Yeoh B.G., Hashim M.A. Spirulina cultivation in digested sago starch factory wastewater. J. Appl. Phycol. 2000, 12:395-400.
23. Patil J.H., Raj M.A., Muralidhara P.L., Desai S.M., Raju G.K.M. Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth using poultry litter as inoculum. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2012, 3(2):94-98.
24. Preeti C.S., Aniruddha B.P. Enhancement in biodegradability of distillery wastewater using enzymatic pretreatment. J. Environ. Manage. 2006, 78(1):77-85.
25. Richards B.K., Cummings R.J., White T.E., Jewell W.J. Methods for kinetic analysis of methane fermentation in high solids biomass digesters. Biomass Bioenergy 1991, 1(2):65-73.
26. Robles-Gonzalez, V., Lopez-Lopez, E., Martinez-Jeronimo, F., Ortega-Clemente, A., Ruiz-Ordaz, N., Galindez-Mayer, J., Rinderknecht-Seijas, N., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., 2010. Combined treatment of mezcal vinasses by ozonation and aerobic biological post-treatment. In: Proceedings of 14th International Biotechnology Symposium. Rimini, Italy, 14-18, September 2010.
27. Speece R.E. Anaerobic Technology for Industrial Wastewaters 1996, Archae Press, USA.
28. Sung S., Liu T. Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemo-sphere 2003, 53(1):43-52.
29. Taherzadeh M.J., Karimi K. Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic material: a review. J. Bioresour. 2007, 2(3):472-499.
30. Yusuf M.O.L., Debora A., Ogheneruona D.E. Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Res. Agr. Eng. 2011, 57(3):97-104.
31. Yusuf M.O.L., Ify N.L. The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:1345-1351.
32. Yavuz Y. EC and EF processes for the treatment of alcohol distillery wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 53:135-140.
33. Zhu B., Gikas P., Zhang R., Lord J., Jenkins B., Li X. Characteristics and biogas production potential of municipal solid wastes pretreated with a rotary drum reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:1122-1129.
34. Zwietering M.H., Jongenburger I., Rombouts F.M., van't Riet Modelling the bacterial growth curve. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56(6):1875-1881.