Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback in motor neurorehabilitation

Current Opinion in Neurology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 412-418

  Linden, David E J ^a   Turner, Duncan L ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

neurological recovery; neuroplasticity; Parkinson's disease; real time functional magnetic resonance imaging; stroke

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

BRAIN STEM; CEREBELLUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROREHABILITATION; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PARKINSON DISEASE; REAL TIME FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD; BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SELF CARE; STROKE;

BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROFEEDBACK; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PARKINSON DISEASE; SELF CARE; STROKE;

EID: 84969834486     PISSN: 13507540     EISSN: 14736551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000340     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Bruehl AB. Making sense of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) and rtfMRI neurofeedback. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015; 18: pyv020.
2. Weiskopf N. Real-time fMRI and its application to neurofeedback. Neuro-Image 2012; 62:682-692.
3. Birbaumer N, Ruiz S, Sitaram R. Learned regulation of brain metabolism. Trends in Cog Sci 2013; 17:295-302.
4. Caria A, Sitaram R, Birbaumer N. Real-time fMRI: a tool for local brain regulation. Neuroscientist 2012; 18:487-501.
5. deCharms RC. Applications of real-time fMRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9:720-729.
6. Stoeckel LE, Garrison KA, Ghosh SS, et al. Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development. NeuroImage Clin 2014; 5:245-455.
7. Sulzer J, Haller S, Scharnowski F, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: progress and challenges. NeuroImage 2013; 76:386-399.
8. Thibault RT, Lifshitz M, Raz A. The self-regulating brain and neurofeedback: experimental science and clinical promise. Cortex 2016; 74: 247-261.
9. Johnston S, Linden DEJ, Healy D, et al. Upregulation of emotion areas through neurofeedback with a focus on positive mood. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2011; 11:44-51.
10. Linden DEJ, Habes I, Johnston SJ, et al. Real-time self-regulation of emotion networks in patients with depression. PLoS One 2012; 7:e38115.
11. Paret C, Ruf M, Gerchen MF, et al. fMRI neurofeedback of amygdala response to aversive stimuli enhances prefrontal-limbic brain connectivity. NeuroImage 2016; 125:182-188.
12. Ruiz S, Lee S, Soekadar SR, et al. Acquired self-control of insula cortex modulates emotion recognition and brain network network connectivity in schizophrenia. Human Brain Mapping 2013; 34:200-212.
13. Sarkheil P, Zilverstand A, Kilian-Hutten N, et al. fMRI feedback enhances emotion regulation as evidenced by a reduced amygdale response. Behav Brain Res 2015; 281:326-332.
14. Zotev V, Phillips R, Yuan H, et al. Self-regulation of human brain activity using simultaneous real-time fMRI and EEG neurofeedback. NeuroImage 2014; 85:985-995.
15. Chapin H, Bagarinao E, Mackey S. Real-time fMRI applied to pain management. Neuro Letts 2012; 520:174-181.
16. Banca P, Sousa T, Duarte IC, Castelo-Branco M. Visual motion imagery neurofeedback based on the hMT/V5neural circuit involving neocortical and cerebellar regions. J Neural Eng 2015; 12:066003.
17. Haller S, Kopel R, Jhooti P, et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain functional networks through neurofeedback. NeuroImage 2013; 81:243-252.
18. Koush Y, Rosa MJ, Robineau F, et al. Connectivity-based neurofeedback: dynamic causal modelling for real-time fMRI. NeuroImage 2013; 81:422-430.
19. Robineau F, Rieger SW, Mermoud C, et al. Self-regulation of inter-hemispheric visual cortex balance through real-time fMRI neurofeedback training. NeuroImage 2014; 100:1-14.
20. Garrison KA, Scheinost D, Worhunsky PD, et al. Real-time fMRI links subjective experience with brain activity during focused attention. NeuroImage 2013; 81:110-118.
21. Shen J, Zhang G, Yao L, Zhao X. Real-time fMRI training-induced changes in regional connectivity mediating verbal working memory behaviorial performance. Neuroscience 2015; 289:144-152.
22. Sherwood MS, Kane JH, Weisend MP, Parker JG. Enhanced control of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex neurophysiology with real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback training and working memory practice. NeuroImage 2016; 124:214-223.
23. Zhang G, Yao L, Shen J, et al. Reorganization of functional brain networks mediates the improvement of cognitive performance following real-time neurofeedback training of working memory. Human Brain Mapping 2015; 36:1705-1715.
24. Zhang G, Yao L, Zhang H, et al. Improved working memory performance through self-regulation of dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex activation using realtime fMRI. PLoS One 2013; 8:e73735.
25. MacInnes JJ, Dickerson KC, Chen N-K, Adcock RA. Cognitive neurostimulation: learning to volitionally sustain ventral tegmental area activation. Neuron 2016; 89:1-12.
26. Sulzer J, Sitiram R, Blefari ML, et al. Neurofeedback-mediated self-regulation of the dopaminergic midbrain. NeuroImage 2013; 83:817-825.
27. Berman BD, Horovitz SG, Ventataraman G, Hallett M. Self-modulation of primary motor cortex activity with motor and motor imagery tasks using realtime fMRI-based neurofeedback. NeuroImage 2012; 59:917-925.
28. Blefari ML, Sulzer J, Hepp-Reymond MC, et al. Improvement in precision grip force control with self-modulation of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. Front Behav Neuro 2015; 9:18.
29. Chiew M, LaConte SM, Graham SJ. Investigation of fMRI neurofeedback of differential primary motor cortex activity using kinaesthetic motor imagery. NeuroImage 2012; 61:21-31.
30. deCharms RC, Christoff K, Glover G, et al. Learned regulation of spatially localized brain activation using real-timefMRI. NeuroImage 2004; 21:436-443.
31. Hui M, Zhang H, Ge R, et al. Modulation of functional network with real-time fMRI feedback training of right premotor cortex activity. Neuropsychologia 2014; 62:111-123.
32. Johnson KA, Hartwell K, LeMatty T, et al. Intermittent ''real-time'' fMRI feedback is superior to continuous presentation for a motor imagery task: a pilot study. J Neuroimaging 2012; 22:58-66.
33. Lee J-H, Ryu J, Jolesz FA, et al. Brain-machine interface via real-time fMRI: preliminary study on thought-controlled robotic arm. Neurosci Lett 2009; 450:1-6.
34. Marins TF, Rodrigues EC, Engel A, et al. Enhancing motor network activity using real-time functional MRI neurofeedback of left premotor cortex. Front Behav Neuro 2015; 9:341.
35. Scharnowski F, Veit R, Zopf R, et al. Manipulating motor performance and memory through real-time fMRI neurofeedback. BiolPsychol 2015;108:85-97.
36. Harmelech T, Friedman D, Malach R. Differential magnetic resonance neurofeedback modulations across extrinsic (visual) and intrinsic (default-mode) nodes of the human cortex. J Neurosci 2015; 35:3288-2595.
37. Cevallos C, Zarka D, Hoellinger T, et al. Oscillations in the human brain during walking execution, imagination and observation. Neuopsychologia 2015; 79:223-232.
38. Hamacher D, Herold F, Wiegel P, et al. Brain activity during walking: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015; 57:310-327.
39. Lemon RN. Descending pathways in motor control. Ann Rev Neurosci 2008; 31:195-218.
40. Borich MR, Brodie SM, Gray WA, et al. Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: opportunities for rehabilitation. Neuropsychologia 2015; 79:246-255.
41. Case LK, Pineda J, Ramachandran VS. Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined and experienced motor and somatosensory activity. Neuropsychologia 2015; 79:233-245.
42. Tagliabue M, McIntyre J. A modular theory of multisensory integration for motor control. Front Comp Neurosci 2014; 8:1.
43. Hardwick RM, Rottschy C, Miall RC, Eickhoff SB. A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain. NeuroImage 2013; 67:283-297.
44. Dayan E, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 2011; 72:443-454.
45. Grefkes C, Ward NS. Cortical reorganisation after stroke: how much and how functional? Neuroscientist 2014; 20:56-70.
46. Lohse KR, Wadden K, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ. Motor skill acquisition across short and long time scales: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Neuropsychologia 2014; 59:130-141.
47. Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26:609-616.
48. Hetu S, Gregoire M, Saimpont A, et al. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobev Rev 2013; 37:930-949.
49. Yoo S-S, Lee J-H, O'Leary H, et al. Neurofeedback fMRI-mediated learning and consolidation of regional brain activation during motor imagery. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2008; 18:69-78.
50. Auer T, Schweizer R, Frahm J. Training efficiency and transfer success in an extended real-time functional MRI neurofeedback training of the somatomotor cortex of healthy subjects. Front Human Neurosci 2015; 9:547.
51. Sitaram R, Veit R, Stevens B, et al. Acquired control of ventral premotor cortex activity by feedback training: an exploratory real-time fMRI and TMS study. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2012; 26:256-265.
52. Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A, et al. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: a proof-of-concept, randomised, doubleblinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2015; 33:911-926.
53. Kantak SS, Stinear JW, Buch ER, Cohen LG. Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2012; 26:282-292.
54. Plow EB, Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A. Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments. Neuroscientist 2015; 21:225-240.
55. Harmelech T, Preminger S, Wertman E, Malach R. The day-after effect: long term Hebbian-like restructuring of resting-state fMRI patterns induced by a single epoch of cortical activation. J Neurosci 2013; 33:9488-9497.
56. Esmail S, Linden DEJ. Neural networks and neurofeedback in Parkinson's disease. Neuroregulation 2014; 1:240-272.
57. Subramanian L, Hindle JV, Johnston S, et al. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci 2011; 31:16309-16317.
58. Buyukturkoglu K, Rana M, Ruiz S, et al. Volitional regulation of the supplemental motor area with fMRI-BCI neurofeedback in Parkinson's disease. San Diego, California: 6th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering; 2013; 677-681.
59. Martinu K, Monchi O. Cortico-basal ganglia and cortico-cerebellar circuits in Parkinson's disease: pathophysiology or compensation? Behav Neurosci 2013; 127:222-236.
60. Liew S-L, Rana M, Cornelsen S, et al. Improving motor corticothalamic communication after stroke using real-time fMRI connectivity-based neurofeedback. Neurorehab Neural Repair 2015; doi 10. 1177/ 1545968315619699. [Epub ahead of print]
61. Mihara M, Miyai I, Hattori N, et al. Neurofeedback using real-time near-infrared spectroscopy enhances motor imagery related cortical activation. PLoS One 2012; 7:e32234.
62. Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopymediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims. Stroke 2013; 44:1091-1098.
63. Gottlich M, Munte TF, Heldmann M, et al. Altered resting state brain networks in Parkinson's disease. PLoS One 2013; 8:e77336.
64. Herz DM, Eickhoff SB, Lokkegaard A, Siebner HR. Functional neuroimaging of motor control in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2014; 35:3227-3237.
65. Vervoort G, Alaerts K, Bengevoord A, et al. Functinal connectivity alterations in the motor and fronto-parietal netwrok relate to behavioral heteregeneity in Parkinson's disease. Parkin Related Disorders 2016; 24:48-55.
66. Dijkhuizen RM, Zaharchuk G, Otte WM. Assessment and modulation of resting-state neural networks after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2014; 27:637-643.
67. Silasi G, Murphy TH. Stroke and the connectome: how connectivity guides therapeutic intervention. Neuron 2014; 83:1354-1368.
68. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic functional reorganisation of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 2010; 133:1124-1238.
69. Emmert K, Kopel R, Sulzer J, et al. Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: how is brain regulation mediated? NeuroImage 2016; 124:806-812.
70. Sharma N, Simmons LH, Jones S, et al. Motor imagery after subcortical stroke. Stroke 2009; 40:1315-1324.
71. McInnes K, Friesen C, Boe S. Specific brain lesions impair explicit motor imagery ability: a systematic review of the evidence. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2016; 97:478-489.
72. Di Rienzo F, Collet C, Hoyek N, Guillo A. Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations. Neuropsychol Rev 2014; 24:116-147.
73. Oostra KM, van Bladel A, Vanhoonacker ACL, Vingerhoets G. Damage to fronto-parietal networks impairs motor imagery ability after stroke: a voxelbased lesion symptom mapping study. Front Behav Neurosci 2016; 10:5.
74. Sharma N, Baron J-C, Rowe JB. Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol 2009; 66:604-616.
75. Ovadia-Caro S, Villiringer K, Fiebach J, et al. Longitudinal effects of lesions on functional netwroks after stroke. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab 2013; 33:1279-1285.
76. Winter Y, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Spottke A, et al. Longitudinal study of the socioeconomic burden of Parkinson's disease in Germany. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17:1156-1163.
77. Jennum P, Iversen HK, Ibsen R, Kjellberg J. Cost of stroke: a controlled national study evaluating societal effects on patients and their partners. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:466.