“Hot Spots, Dark-Side Dots, Tin Pots”: The Uneven Internationalism of the Global Academic Market

Knowledge and Space

Volumn 7, Issue , 2015, Pages 247-262

  Paasi, Anssi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anglophonic hegemony; Human geography; Internationality; Lingua franca; Power; Role of language; Scientific community

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969809584     PISSN: 18779220     EISSN: 25430580     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9960-7_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Ackerman, E. A. (1945). Geographic training, wartime research, and immediate professional objectives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 35, 121–143. doi:10.1080/00045604509357271.
2. Agnew, J. (2009). The impact factors. AAG Newsletter, 44, 3.
3. Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, J. S. (1981). The transfer of ideas into Anglo-American human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 5, 42–57.
4. Alasuutari, P. (2004). The globalization of qualitative research. In C. Seale, D. Silverman, J. Gubrium, & G. Gobo (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 595–608). London: Sage.
5. Albert, M. (2003). Universities and the market economy: The differential impact of knowledge production in sociology and economics. Higher Education, 45, 147–182. doi:10.1023/A:1022428802287.
6. Barnes, T. J. (2004). Placing ideas: Genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 565–595. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph506oa.
7. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Buttimer, A., Brunn, S., & Wardenga, U. (1999). Text and image: Social construction of regional knowledge (Beiträge zur regionalen Geographie, Vol. 49). Leipzig, Germany: Institut für Länderkunde.
10. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11. Castree, N., & Sparke, M. (2000). Professional geography and the corporatization of the university: Experiences, evaluations, and engagements. Antipode, 32, 222–229. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00131.
12. Frijhoff, W., & Spies, M. (2004). Dutch culture in a European perspective. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Fuller, S. (2002). Knowledge management foundations . Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
14. Garcia-Ramon, M. D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 1–5. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph409xx.
15. Gregson, N., Simonsen, K., & Vaiou, D. (2003). Writing (across) Europe: On writing spaces and writing practices. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 5–22. doi:10.1177/0969776403010001521.
16. Guetzkow, J., Lamonot, M., & Mallard, G. (2004). What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 69, 190–212. doi:10.1177/000312240406900203.
17. Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography. Lancaster, PA: Association of American Geographers.
18. Harvey, D. (1984). On the history and present condition of geography: An historical materialist manifesto. The Professional Geographer, 36, 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00001.x.
19. Harvey, D. (2006). Editorial: The geographies of critical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 31, 409–412. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00219.x.
20. Kallo, J. (2009). OECD education policy: A comparative and historical study focusing on the thematic reviews of tertiary education (Research in Educational Sciences, Vol. 45). Jyväskylä, Finland: Finish Educational Research Association.
21. King, R. (2004). The university in the global age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Kitchin, R. (2005). Commentary: Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 6, 1–15. doi:10.1080/146493 6052000335937.
23. Krieger, J. (2006). American hegemony and the postwar reconstruction of science in Europe . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Kuhn, T. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. M. (1997). The exchange of knowledge: A small country in the international research community. Science Communication, 18, 238–264. doi:10.1177/10755470970 18003004.
26. Livingstone, D. N. (2003). Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27. Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 285–289. doi:10.1068/d1803ed.
28. Nayak, A., & Jeffrey, A. (2011). Geographical thought: An introduction to ideas in human geography. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
29. Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism and the uneven geographies of the international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37, 769–789. doi:10.1068/a3769.
30. Paasi, A. (2006). “Internationalismens” ulige geografi inden for den globale akademiske basar [“Internationalism”: Unequal geography within the global academic market]. In K. Buciek, J.-O. Baerenholdt, M. Haldrup, & J. Ploger (Eds.), Rumlig Praksis (pp. 49–62). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde Universitetforlag.
31. Paasi, A. (2011). From region to space – Part II. In J. A. Agnew & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to human geography (pp. 161–175). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. Paasi, A. (2013). Fennia: Positioning a ‘peripheral’ but an international journal under conditions of academic capitalism. Fennia, 191, 1–13. doi:10.11143/7787.
33. Paasi, A. (2015). Academic capitalism and the geopolitics of knowledge. In J. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. Secor & J. Sharp (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political geography (pp. 509–523). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. Parmar, I. (2002). American foundations and the development of international knowledge networks. Global Networks, 2, 13–30. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00024.
35. Parsons, T. (1947/1966). Introduction. In M. Weber (Ed.), The theory of economic and social organization (pp. 3–86). New York: The Free Press.
36. Rodriquez-Pose, A. (2004). On English as a vehicle to preserve geographical diversity. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 1–4. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph467xx.
37. Samers, M., & Sidaway, J. (2000). Exclusions, inclusions, and occlusions in ‘Anglo-American geography’: Reflections on Minca’s ‘Venetian geographical praxis’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 663–666. doi:10.1068/d1806ed.
38. Schoenberger, E. (2001). Interdisciplinarity and social power. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 365–382. doi:10.1191/030913201680191727.
39. Scholte, A. (2000). Globalization: A critical introduction . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. Shusterman, R. (2000, August 11). The perils of making philosophy a lingua Americana. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(49), B4–B5. Washington, D.C.
41. Tietze, S., & Dick, P. (2009). Hegemonic practices and knowledge production in the management academy: An English language perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 119– 123. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.11.010.
42. Ward, K., Johnston, R., Richards, K., Matthew, G., Taylor, Z., Paasi, A., et al. (2009). The future of research monographs: An international set of perspectives. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 101–126. doi:10.1177/0309132508100966.
43. Wright, J. K. (1966). Human nature in geography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.