An exploratory comparison of the roles of representations in face to face and online collaborative learning

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Suthers, D D ^a   Hundhausen, C D ^a   Girardeau, L E ^a  

^a University of Hawai'i at Manoa   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FACE-TO-FACE COMMUNICATIONS; NETWORKED SOFTWARE; ONLINE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; QUANTITATIVE DATA; SHARED DISPLAYS; SYNCHRONOUS COLLABORATION;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 84969545654     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (1998). Analysing the Costs and Benefits of Multi-Representational Learning Environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (eds.), Learning with Multiple Representations, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Ltd, 1998, pp. 120-134.
2. Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J., Ramirez, A., Kam, K., Dunbar, N., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication 52: 657-677.
3. Clark, H.H. & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in Communication. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, pp. 127-149.
4. Doerry, E. (1996). An Empirical Comparison of Copresent and Technologically-Mediated Interaction based on Communicative Breakdown. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Oregon. CIS- TR-96-01.
5. nd Hawai'i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS 32). (CD-ROM). Maui, Hawai'i: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
6. Hoadley, C. & Enyedy, N. (1999). Between Information and Communication: Middle Spaces in Computer Media for Learning. In Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference, C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.) Dec. 12-15, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 242-251.
7. Hundhausen, C. D., & Douglas, S. A. (In press). Low fidelity algorithm visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing.
8. Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
9. Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (1997). Research on computer-supported cooperative work. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd Edition), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Russel, T. L. (1999). The No Significant Difference Phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina University. See also http://teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificantdifference/ (accessed August 24, 2002).
11. Schank, P., & Kozma, R. (in press). Learning Chemistry Through the Use of a Representation-Based Knowledge Building Environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.
12. Suthers, D. (2001a). Towards a Systematic Study of Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning Discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science 7(3), 2001. Online: http://www.jucs.org/jucs-7-3/towards-a-systematic-study
13. Suthers, D. (2001b). Collaborative Representations: Supporting Face to Face and Online Knowledge-building Discourse. Proceedings of the 34th Hawai'i International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-34), January 3-6, 2001, Maui, Hawai'i, (CD-ROM), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE).
14. Suthers, D. & Hundhausen, C. (2001). Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, K. Hakkarainen (Eds.) European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastrict, the Netherlands, March 22-24 2001, pp. 577-584.
15. Suthers, D. & Hundhausen, C. (2002). The Effects of Representation on Students' Elaborations in Collaborative Inquiry, Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 Conference, Boulder, Colorado, January 7-11, 2002, pp.472-480.
16. Suthers, D, Connelly, J., Lesgold, A., Paolucci, M., Toth, E., Toth, J., and Weiner, A. (2001). Representational and Advisory Guidance for Students Learning Scientific Inquiry. In K. D. Forbus and P. J. Feltovich (Eds.) Smart Machines in Education: The Coming Revolution in Educational Technology. Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 2001, pp. 7-35.
17. Toth, E., Suthers, D. & Lesgold, A. (2002). Mapping to know: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry skills. Science Education 86(2): 264-286.
18. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Bieber, M., Fjermestad, J., & Rana, A. (1999). Collaborative discourse structures in computer mediated group communications. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 4(4). Online: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/
19. Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 20(4), 473-501.