User review sites as a resource for large-scale sociolinguistic studies

WWW 2015 - Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 452-461

  Hovy, Dirk ^a   Johannsen, Anders ^a   Søgaard, Anders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Insights from natural language analysis of social media; Language Analysis techniques; Multi lingual and crosslingual analysis and mining; Novel applications; Social science research based on social media

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; METADATA; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

CROSS-LINGUAL; DATA AND METADATA; LANGUAGE ANALYSIS; LARGE SCALE SOURCE; LINGUISTIC VARIABLE; NOVEL APPLICATIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84968860912     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Ordbog over det danske sprog. Gyldendal, 2nd edition edition, 1967.
2. EUROSTAT regional yearbook 2013. EUROSTAT, 2013.
3. C. I. Agency. Field Listing-Median Age, 2014.
4. J. S. Alowibdi, U. A. Buy, and P. Yu. Empirical evaluation of profile characteristics for gender classification on twitter. In Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 2013 12th International Conference on, volume 1, pages 365-369. IEEE, 2013.
5. D. Bamman, C. Dyer, and N. A. Smith. Distributed representations of geographically situated language. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 828-834. ACL, 2014.
6. D. Bamman, J. Eisenstein, and T. Schnoebelen. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2):135-160, 2014.
7. C. Boulis and M. Ostendorf. A quantitative analysis of lexical differences between genders in telephone conversations. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 435-442. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005.
8. K. Button, J. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, B. Nosek, J. Flint, E. Robinson, and M. Munafo. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14:365-376, 2013.
9. P. M. Carter. Shared spaces, shared structures: Latino social formation and african american english in the us south. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(1):66-92, 2013.
10. M. Ciot, M. Sonderegger, and D. Ruths. Gender inference of twitter users in non-english contexts. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, Wash, pages 18-21, 2013.
11. H. Daume III. Non-parametric bayesian areal linguistics. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 593-601. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.
12. G. Doyle. Mapping dialectal variation by querying social media. In EACL, 2014.
13. J. Eisenstein. Phonological factors in social media writing. In Workshop on Language Analysis in Social Media, NAACL, 2013.
14. J. Eisenstein. What to do about bad language on the internet. In NAACL, 2013.
15. J. Eisenstein, N. Smith, and E. Xing. Discovering sociolinguistic associations with structured sparsity. In ACL, 2011.
16. J. Ganitkevitch, B. Van Durme, and C. Callison-Burch. Ppdb: The paraphrase database. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 758-764, 2013.
17. J. Holmes. Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(2):195-223, 1997.
18. R. Jones and A. Irvine. The (un)faithful machine translator. In ACL Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH), 2013.
19. W. Labov. The social stratification of English in New York City. PhD thesis, Columbia university, 1964.
20. J. Li, A. Ritter, and E. Hovy. Weakly supervised user profile extraction from twitter. In ACL, 2014.
21. W. Liu and D. Ruths. What's in a name? using first names as features for gender inference in twitter. In Analyzing Microtext: 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium, 2013.
22. R. Macaulay. You're like why not?' the quotative expressions of glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(1):3-21, 2001.
23. R. Macaulay. Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting? adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3):398-417, 2002.
24. L. Milroy and J. Milroy. Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in society, 21(01):1-26, 1992.
25. J. Nerbonne. Linguistic variation and computation. In Proceedings of EACL, pages 3-10. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.
26. D. Nguyen, D. Trieschnigg, A. S. Dogruoz, R. Gravel, M. Theune, T. Meder, and F. D. Jong. Predicting Author Gender and Age from Tweets: Sociolinguistic Theories and Crowd Wisdom. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, 2014.
27. J. Rickford and M. Price. Girlz ii women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(2):143-179, 2013.
28. R. B. Russ. Examining Regional Variation Through Online Geotagged Corpora. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, 2013.
29. J. E. Schmidt and J. Herrgen. Digitaler Wenker-Atlas (DiWA). Bearbeitet von Alfred Lameli, Tanja Giessler, Roland Kehrein, Alexandra Lenz, Karl-Heinz Muller, Jost Nickel, Christoph Purschke und Stefan Rabanus. Erste vollstandige Ausgabe von Georg Wenkers \Sprachatlas des Deutschen Reichs", 2001.
30. A. Sogaard. Zipfian corruptions for robust pos tagging. In NAACL, 2013.
31. A.-B. Stenstrom. Taboos in teenage talk. Stockholm studies in English, 85:71-79, 1995.
32. I. Stewart. Now we stronger than ever: African-American syntax in twitter. EACL 2014, page 31, 2014.