The effect of intergroup contact on secondary group attitudes and social dominance orientation

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 328-342

  Shook, Natalie J ^a   Hopkins, Patricia D ^a   Koech, Jasmine M ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

contact hypothesis; intergroup contact; secondary transfer effect; social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968648449     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430215572266     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. M.K.AhluwaliaL.Pellettiere (2010). Sikh men post-9/11: Misidentification, discrimination, and coping. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(4), 303–314. doi:10.1037/a0022156
2. G.W.Allport (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Y.Amir (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and race relations. In (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 245–280). New York, NY: Pergamon.
4. F.AsbrockC.NiewoudtJ.DuckittC.G.Sibley (2011). Societal stereotypes and the legitimation of intergroup behavior in Germany and New Zealand. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 154–179.
5. D.A.Ballinger (2011). “So, you’re a Muslim? (not that there’s anything wrong with that)”. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(8), 37–41. doi:10.1080/07303084.2011.10598677
6. N.A.BowmanT.M.Griffin (2012). Secondary transfer effects of interracial contact: The moderating role of social status. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18(1), 35–44. doi:10.1037/a0026745
7. J.M.ConverseS.Presser (1986). Survey questions: Handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. K.DhontA.van Hiel (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
9. K.DhontA.van HielM.Hewstone (2014). Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 27–44. doi:10.1177/1368430213497064
10. B.DuntonR.Fazio (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326. doi:10.1177/0146167297233009
11. A.EllerD.Abrams (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 229–256. doi:10.1002/ejsp.194
12. R.H.FazioJ.R.EiserN.J.Shook (2004). Attitude formation through exploration: Valence asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 293–311. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.87.3.292
13. H.HaleyJ.Sidanius (2005). Person–organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 187–203. doi:10.1177/1368430205051067
14. G.Hodson (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351. doi:10.1348/014466607X231109
15. L.HuangJ.H.Liu (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 267–276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.006
16. J.JettenA.Iyer (2010). Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: Predicting political attitudes over time. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385–404. doi:10.1348/014466609X435723
17. K.Y.Joshi (2006). The racialization of Hinduism, Islam, and Sikhism in the United States. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(3), 211–226. doi:10.1080/10665680600790327
18. J.T.JostE.P.Thompson (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitude among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
19. S.LolliotK.SchmidM.HewstoneA.Al RamiahN.TauschH.Swart (2013). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. In (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 81–112). London, UK: Psychology Press.
20. T.F.Pettigrew (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
21. T.F.Pettigrew (2009). Secondary transfer effect on contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups?Social Psychology, 40(2), 55–65. doi:10.1027/1864–9335.40.2.55
22. T.F.PettigrewL.R.Tropp (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.751
23. R.E.PhelpsD.B.AltschulJ.M.WisenbakerJ.F.DayD.CooperC.G.Potter (1998). Roommate satisfaction and ethnic identity in mixed-race and White university roommate dyads. Journal of College Student Development, 39, 194–203.
24. F.PrattoJ.SidaniusL.M.StallworthB.F.Malle (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting scale and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
25. K.J.PreacherA.F.Hayes (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
26. K.SchmidM.HewstoneB.KüpperA.ZickU.Wagner (2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(1), 28–51. doi:10.1177/0190272511430235
27. N.J.ShookR.H.Fazio (2008). Interracial roommate relationships: An experimental test of the contact hypothesis. Psychological Science, 19, 717–723. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02147.x
28. N.J.ShookR.H.FazioJ.R.Eiser (2007). Attitude generalization: Similarity, valence, and extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 641–647. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.005
29. C.G.SibleyJ.Duckitt (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. doi:10.1177/1088868308319226
30. N.TauschM.HewstoneJ.B.KenworthyC.PsaltisK.SchmidJ.R.PopanJ.Hughes (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 282–302. doi:10.1037/a0018553
31. L.R.Tropp (2007). Perceived discrimination and interracial contact: Predicting interracial closeness among Black and White Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 70–81. doi:10.1177/019027250707000108
32. L.R.TroppT.F.Pettigrew (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
33. C.Van LaarS.LevinS.SinclairJ.Sidanius (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 329–345. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002
34. L.VezzaliD.Giovannini (2011). Cross-group friendships, social dominance orientation and secondary transfer effect. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(3), 181–194. doi:10.1002/casp.1103
35. L.VezzaliD.Giovannini (2012). Secondary transfer effect on intergroup contact: The role of intergroup attitudes, intergroup anxiety and perspective taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 125–144. doi:10.1002/casp.1103