Pathophysiology and management of multivalvular disease

Nature Reviews Cardiology

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 429-440

  Unger, Philippe ^a   Clavel, Marie Annick ^b   Lindman, Brian R ^c   Mathieu, Patrick ^b   Pibarot, Philippe ^b  

^a SAINT PIERRE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE;

AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE CLIP; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MITRAL VALVE COMMISSUROTOMY; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; MITRAL VALVE SURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RHEUMATIC HEART DISEASE; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRICUSPID VALVE REGURGITATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; RISK FACTOR;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84966638890     PISSN: 17595002     EISSN: 17595010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.57     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Iung B, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. 24, 1231-1243 (2003).
2. Lee R, et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 91, 677-684 (2011).
3. Vassileva C. M, et al. Outcome characteristics of multiple-valve surgery: comparison with single-valve procedures. Innovations (Phila.) 9, 27-32 (2014).
4. Leon M. B, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Eng. J. Med. 363, 1597-1607 (2010).
5. Smith C. R, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2187-2198 (2011).
6. Lindman B. R, et al. Effect of tricuspid regurgitation and the right heart on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II inoperable cohort. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 8, 1-10 (2015).
7. Roberts W. C, & Sullivan M. F. Clinical and necropsy observations early after simultaneous replacement of the mitral and aortic valves. Am. J. Cardiol. 58, 1067-1084 (1986).
8. Goldbarg S. H, Elmariah S, Miller M. A, & Fuster V. Insights into degenerative aortic valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50, 1205-1213 (2007).
9. Unger P, Rosenhek R, Dedobbeleer C, Berrebi A, & Lancellotti P. Management of multiple valve disease. Heart 97, 272-277 (2011).
10. DeBonis B. M, Maisano F, La C. G, & Alfieri O. Treatment and management of mitral regurgitation. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 9, 133-146 (2012).
11. Nombela-Franco L, et al. Significant mitral regurgitation left untreated at the time of aortic valve replacement: a comprehensive review of a frequent entity in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63, 2643-2658 (2014).
12. Kodali S. K, & Moses J. W. Coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: old questions, new paradigms: the evolving role of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 125, 975-977 (2012).
13. Barbanti M, et al. Impact of preoperative moderate/.severe mitral regurgitation on 2 year outcome after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insight from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial Cohort A. Circulation 128, 2776-2784 (2013).
14. Bedogni F, et al. Interplay between mitral regurgitation and transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve Revalving System: a multicenter registry. Circulation 128, 2145-2153 (2013).
15. Barreiro C. J, et al. Aortic valve replacement and concomitant mitral valve regurgitation in the elderly: impact on survival and functional outcome. Circulation 112, I443-I447 (2005).
16. Kim D. H, et al. Aortic valve adaptation to aortic root dilatation: insights into the mechanism of functional aortic regurgitation from 3 dimensional cardiac computed tomography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 7, 828-835 (2014).
17. Unger P, et al. Mitral regurgitation in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. Heart 96, 9-14 (2010).
18. Paradis J. M, et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: what do we know?. What don't we know?. A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms. Eur. Heart J. 35, 2069-2082 (2014).
19. Unger P, et al. Effects of valve replacement for aortic stenosis on mitral regurgitation. Am. J. Cardiol. 102, 1378-1382 (2008).
20. Greve A. M, et al. Prognostic importance of atrial fibrillation in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study. Int. J. Cardiol. 166, 72-76 (2013).
21. Kristensen C. B, Jensen J. S, Sogaard P, Carstensen H. G, & Mogelvang R. Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis - echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 10, 38 (2012).
22. Unger P, Lancellotti P, & de Canniere D. The clinical challenge of concomitant aortic and mitral valve stenosis. Acta Cardiol. 71, 3-6 (2016).
23. Honey M. Clinical and haemodynamic observations on combined mitral and aortic stenosis. Br. Heart J. 23, 545-555 (1961).
24. Zitnik R. S, et al. The masking of aortic stenosis by mitral stenosis. Am. Heart J. 69, 22-30 (1965).
25. Otto C. M, & Bonow R. O. in Braunwald's Heart Disease (eds Libby P. et al.) 1625-1693 (Saunders Elsevier, 2008).
26. Tyagi G, Dang P, Pasca I, Patel R, & Pai R. G. Progression of degenerative mitral stenosis: insights from a cohort of 254 patients. J. Heart Valve Dis. 23, 707-712 (2014).
27. Gash A. K, Carabello B. A, Kent R. L, Frazier J. A, & Spann J. F. Left ventricular performance in patients with coexistent mitral stenosis and aortic insufficiency. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 3, 703-711 (1984).
28. Cohn L. H, et al. Preoperative assessment of aortic regurgitation in patients with mitral valve disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 19, 177-182 (1967).
29. Niles N, et al. Preoperative left and right ventricular performance in combined aortic and mitral regurgitation and comparison with isolated aortic or mitral regurgitation. Am. J. Cardiol. 65, 1372-1378 (1990).
30. Gentles T. L, Finucane A. K, Remenyi B, Kerr A. R, & Wilson N. J. Ventricular function before and after surgery for isolated and combined regurgitation in the young. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 100, 1383-1389 (2015).
31. Skudicky D, Essop M. R, & Sareli P. Time-related changes in left ventricular function after double valve replacement for combined aortic and mitral regurgitation in a young rheumatic population. Circulation 95, 899-904 (1997).
32. Taramasso M, et al. The growing clinical importance of secondary tricuspid regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59, 703-710 (2012).
33. Chikwe J, Itagaki S, Anyanwu A, & Adams D. H. Impact of concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty on tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular function, and pulmonary artery hypertension after repair of mitral valve prolapse. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65, 1931-1938 (2015).
34. Jeong D. S, et al. Fate of functional tricuspid regurgitation in aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 148, 1328-1333 (2014).
35. Dahou A, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction: results of the multicenter TOPAS study (true or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 8, 588-596 (2015).
36. Lancellotti P, et al. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 611-644 (2013).
37. Moro E, Nicolosi G. L, Zanuttini D, Cervesato E, & Roelandt J. Influence of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of the pressure half-Time and derived mitral-valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur. Heart J. 9, 1010-1017 (1988).
38. Flachskampf F. A, et al. Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-Time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 16, 396-404 (1990).
39. Nishimura R. A, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63, 2438-2488 (2014).
40. Goldenheim P. D, & Kazemi H. Cardiopulmonary monitoring of critically ill patients (2). N. Engl. J. Med. 311, 776-780 (1984).
41. van Grondelle A, Ditchey R. V, Groves B. M, Wagner W. W. Jr, & Reeves J. T. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am. J. Physiol. 245, H690-H692 (1983).
42. Tops L. F, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 1, 321-330 (2008).
43. O'Brien B, et al. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 566-573 (2011).
44. Ng A. C, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- And 3 dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 94-102 (2010).
45. Clavel M. A, et al. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and doppler echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 8, 248-257 (2015).
46. Clavel M. A, et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 23, 380-386 (2010).
47. Clavel M. A, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler-echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 62, 2329-2338 (2013).
48. Clavel M. A, et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 64, 1202-1213 (2014).
49. Schlosshan D, Aggarwal G, Mathur G, Allan R, & Cranney G. Real-Time 3D transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation of rheumatic mitral stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4, 580-588 (2011).
50. Chu J. W, et al. Assessing mitral valve area and orifice geometry in calcific mitral stenosis: a new solution by real-Time three-dimensional echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 21, 1006-1009 (2008).
51. Delgado V, et al. Multimodality imaging before, during, and after percutaneous mitral valve repair. Heart 97, 1704-1714 (2011).
52. Vahanian A, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur. Heart J. 33, 2451-2496 (2012).
53. Galloway A. C, et al. Multiple valve operation for advanced valvular heart disease: results and risk factors in 513 patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 19, 725-732 (1992).
54. Rankin J. S, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95, 1484-1490 (2013).
55. Han Q. Q, et al. Primary triple valve surgery for advanced rheumatic heart disease in Mainland China: a single-center experience with 871 clinical cases. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 31, 845-850 (2007).
56. Fukunaga N, et al. Clinical outcomes of redo valvular operations: a 20 year experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 94, 2011-2016 (2012).
57. Otto C. M, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95, 2262-2270 (1997).
58. Wagner S, & Selzer A. Patterns of progression of aortic stenosis: a longitudinal hemodynamic study. Circulation 65, 709-712 (1982).
59. Vaturi M, et al. The natural history of aortic valve disease after mitral valve surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33, 2003-2008 (1999).
60. Rosenhek R, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 611-617 (2000).
61. Borer J. S, & Bonow R. O. Contemporary approach to aortic and mitral regurgitation. Circulation 108, 2432-2438 (2003).
62. Weisenberg D, et al. Mid-Term echocardiographic progression of patients with moderate aortic regurgitation: implications for aortic valve surgery. J. Heart Valve Dis. 22, 192-194 (2013).
63. Gordon S. P. F, Douglas P. S, Come P. C, & Manning W. J. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic determinants of the natural history of mitral valve narrowing in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis: implications for follow up. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 19, 968-973 (1992).
64. Sagie A, et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of long-Term progression of mitral stenosis in 103 patients: valve area and right heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 28, 472-479 (1996).
65. Thalji N. M, et al. Untreated aortic valve stenosis identified at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting: thresholds associated with adverse prognosis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 47, 712-719 (2015).
66. Dagenais F, Mathieu P, Doyle D, Dumont E, & Voisine P. Moderate aortic stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafting patients more than 70 years of age: to replace or not to replace?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90, 1495-1499 (2010).
67. Sareyyupoglu B, et al. Management of mild aortic stenosis at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery: should the valve be replaced?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88, 1224-1231 (2009).
68. Boning A, et al. Should the aortic valve be replaced in patients with mild aortic stenosis admitted for coronary surgery?. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 56, 467-470 (2008).
69. Pereira J. J, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis and coronary bypass surgery. Am. J. Med. 118, 735-742 (2005).
70. Regeer M. V, et al. Mitral valve geometry changes in patients with aortic regurgitation. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28, 455-462 (2015).
71. Toggweiler S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59, 2068-2074 (2012).
72. Unger P, Dedobbeleer C, Vanden Eynden F, & Lancellotti P. Mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: does the prosthesis matter?. Int. J. Cardiol. 168, 1706-1709 (2013).
73. Nombela-Franco L, et al. Clinical impact and evolution of mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-Analysis. Heart 101, 1395-1405 (2015).
74. Maluenda G, et al. Changes in mitral regurgitation after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Am. J. Cardiol. 108, 1777-1782 (2011).
75. Nath J, Foster E, & Heidenreich P. A. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-Term survival. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 405-409 (2004).
76. Braunwald N. S, Ross J. Jr, & Morrow A. G. Conservative management of tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. Circulation 35, I63-I69 (1967).
77. Groves P. H, Lewis N. P, Ikram S, Maire R, & Roger J. C. H. Reduced exercise capacity in patients with tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease. Br. Heart J. 66, 295-301 (1991).
78. King R. M, et al. Surgery for tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 70 (Suppl. 2), I193-I197 (1984).
79. Dreyfus G. D, Corbi P. J, Chan K. M, & Bahrami T. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 79, 127-132 (2005).
80. Gillinov A. M, et al. Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 125, 1372-1387 (2003).
81. Talwar S, Mathur A, Choudhary S. K, Singh R, & Kumar A. S. Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 84, 1219-1225 (2007).
82. Thourani V. H, et al. Does mitral valve repair offer an advantage over replacement in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 98, 598-603 (2014).
83. Leavitt B. J, et al. Outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery in northern new England. Circulation 120, S155-S162 (2009).
84. Hamamoto M, et al. Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 75, 28-33 (2003).
85. Kuwaki K, et al. Mitral valve repair versus replacement in simultaneous mitral and aortic valve surgery for rheumatic disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83, 558-563 (2007).
86. Magne J, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of short-Term and long-Term survival. Circulation 120, S104-S111 (2009).
87. Acker M. A, et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 23-32 (2014).
88. Arsalan M, Walther T, Smith R. L, & Grayburn P. A. Tricuspid regurgitation diagnosis and treatment. Eur. Heart J. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/.ehv487 (2015).
89. Gatti G, et al. Tricuspid annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation secondary to left-sided heart valve disease: immediate outcomes and risk factors for late failure. Can. J. Cardiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/.j.cjca.2015.09.007 (2015).
90. Rudolph V, et al. Bivalvular transcatheter treatment of high-surgical-risk patients with coexisting severe aortic stenosis and significant mitral regurgitation. Int. J. Cardiol. 167, 716-720 (2013).
91. Kische S, et al. Staged total percutaneous treatment of aortic valve pathology and mitral regurgitation: institutional experience. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 82, E552-E563 (2013).
92. Vahanian A, Himbert d, & Brochet E. Multiple valve disease - Assessment, strategy and intervention. EuroIntervention 11, W14-W16 (2015).
93. Himbert D, et al. Transvenous mitral valve replacement after failure of surgical ring annuloplasty. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 1205-1206 (2012).
94. Himbert d, et al. Transcatheter valve replacement in patients with severe mitral valve disease and annular calcification. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 64, 2557-2558 (2014).
95. Campelo-Parada F, et al. First in man experience of a novel transcatheter repair system for treating severe tricuspid regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66, 2475-2483 (2015).
96. Lancellotti P, et al. ESC working group on valvular heart disease position paper - heart valve clinics: organization, structure, and experiences. Eur. Heart J. 34, 1597-1606 (2013).
97. Sanchez-Ledesma M, et al. Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: immediate results, short-Term, and long-Term outcome. Am. Heart J. 156, 361-366 (2008).
98. Bissessor N, et al. The role of natriuretic peptides in patients with chronic complex (mixed or multiple) heart valve disease. Congest. Heart Fail. 16, 50-54 (2010).
99. Bissessor N, et al. Complex valve disease: pre-surgical functional capacity evaluation using peak oxygen consumption. J. Heart Valve Dis. 18, 554-561 (2009).