The Internet, cross-border trade in services, and the GATS: Lessons from US–Gambling

World Trade Review

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 319-355

  Wunsch Vincent, Sacha ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966541892     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745606002965     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arkell, J. (2002), ‘The GATS – Its Innovative Approach to Trade Rules in the New Economy’, address to the 12th Annual International Conference of the European Network of Economic and Spatial Service Research, Manchester, 26–27 September 2002, www.arkell.info/conferences.html.
2. Arkell, J. (2005), ‘Assessing Current Proposals on Domestic Regulations : Which are the Next Steps?’, Paper for the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
3. Bachetta, M., P. Low, A. Mattoo, L. Schuknecht, H. Wager, and M. Wehrens (1998), Electronic Commerce and the Role of the WTO, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
4. Berkey, J. O. and E. Tinawi (1999), ‘E-Services and the WTO: The Adequacy of the GATS Classification Framework’, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/60/2092597.pdf.
5. Chander, A. (2004), ‘Globalization and Distrust’, at The Yale Law Journal’s Symposium on Democratic Ground: New Perspectives on John Hart Ely, The Yale Law Journal, 114: 1193 ff.
6. Cottier, T., P. Mavroidis, and P. Blatter (1999), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Nondiscrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present and Future, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Drake, W. and K. Nicolaidis (2000), ‘Global Electronic Commerce and the GATS: The “Millennium Round” and Beyond’, in P. Sauvé and R. M. Stern (eds.), GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 399–437.
8. GAO (2002), ‘Internet Gambling: An Overview of the Issues’, United States General Accounting Office, GAO – 03–89. Washington, DC.
9. Hauser, H. and S. Wunsch-Vincent (2001), ‘A Call for a WTO E-Commerce Initiative’, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy (Winter 2000/2001), IJCLP Web-Doc 1–6 2001, www.ijclporg/6_2001/pdf/ijclp_webdoc_1_6_2001.pdf.
10. Hauser, H. and S. Wunsch-Vincent (2002), ‘The Cross-Border Trade in Electronic Services: The Role of the WTO and the Role of National Policies’ (in German), prepared for the German Parliament, Internet: www.siaw.unisg.ch.
11. Krajewski, M. (2003), National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
12. Krajewski, M. (2005), ‘Playing the rules of the game? Specific commitments after US–Gambling and Betting and the current GATS negotiations’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 32(4): 417–447.
13. Low, P. and A. Mattoo (2000), ‘Is There a Better Way? Alternative Approaches to Liberalization under GATS’, in P. Sauvé and R. M. Stern (eds.), GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalisation, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 449–472.
14. Mann, C. L., S. E. Eckert, and S. C. Knight (2000), Global Electronic Commerce – A Policy Primer, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
15. Mattoo, A. (1997), ‘National Treatment in the GATS: Corner-stone or Pandora’s Box?’, Journal of World Trade, 31: 107–135.
16. Mattoo, A. (2001), ‘Shaping Future GATS Rules for Trade in Services’, World Bank Policy Research Group Paper, WPS2596, Internet: www.worldbank.org.
17. Mattoo, A. (2005), ‘Services in a Development Round: Three Goals and Three Proposals’, Journal of World Trade, 39(6).
18. Mattoo, A. and S. Wunsch-Vincent (2004), ‘Pre-empting Protectionism in Services: The WTO and Outsourcing’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4): 765–801.
19. OECD (2004), ‘Information Technology Outlook’, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
20. OECD (2006, forthcoming), ‘Information Technology Outlook’, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.
21. Pauwelyn, J. (2005a), ‘Rien Ne Va Plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in GATT and GATS’, World Trade Review, 4(2), earlier version under www.law.duke.edu/fac/pauwelyn/pdf/RienNeVaPlus.pdf.
22. Pauwelyn, J. (2005b), ‘WTO Softens Earlier Condemnation of US Ban on Internet Gambling, but Confirms Broad Reach into Sensitive Domestic Regulation?’, ASIL Insight, 12 April 2005, www.asil.org/insights/2005/04/insights050412.html.
23. Reidenberg, J. R. (2005), ‘Technology and Internet Jurisdiction’, Pennsylvania Law Review, 153 (2005): 1951 ff.
24. Sauvé, P. (2002), ‘Completing the GATS Framework: Addressing Uruguay Round Leftovers’, Aussenwirtschaft, 57(3): 301–341.
25. Trachtman, J. P. (2002), ‘Lessons for GATS Article VI from the SPS, TBT and GATT Treatment of Domestic Regulation’, SSRN Draft, 29 January 2002, ssrn.com/abstract=298760.
26. Trachtman, J. P. (2005), ‘Commentary on United States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services’, WT/DS285/AB/R, European Journal of International Law, 16(4): 801 ff, www.ejil.org/journal/curdevs/sr47.pdf.
27. Trebilcock, M. and R. Howse (2005), The Regulation of International Trade, 3rd edition, Oxford: Routledge.
28. UN (1991), ‘Provisional Central Product Classification (CPC)’, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Papers, Series M(77, Ver.1.1, E.91.XVII.7, United Nations, New York.
29. UN (2002), ‘Central Product Classification (CPC)’, Version 1.1, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Papers, SeriesMNo 77, Ver.1.1, ESA/STAT/SERM/77/Ver.1.1, United Nations, New York.
30. UN ICT Task Force (2005), ‘WTO, E-Commerce and Information Technologies: From the Uruguay Round through the Doha Development Agenda’, Sacha Wunsch-Vincent (author), Joanna McIntosh (ed.), United Nations Information and Communication Technology Task Force, UN ICT Task Force, New York, www.unicttaskforce.org/perl/documents.pl?id=1536.
31. World Trade Law.net (2005a), ‘Dispute Settlement Commentary on the Panel Report: US – Measures Affecting the Cross-border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services’, WT/DS285/R’.
32. World Trade Law.net (2005b) ‘Dispute Settlement Commentary on the Appellate Body Report: US – Measures Affecting the Cross-border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services’, WT/DS285/AB/R’.
33. Wunsch-Vincent, S (2006) The WTO, the Internet and Digital Products: EC and US Perspectives, Oxford: Hart Publishing, Internet: www.wto-research.org.