Rien ne Va Plus? Distinguishing domestic regulation from market access in GATT and GATS

World Trade Review

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 131-170

  Pauwelyn, Joost ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950356034     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745605002351     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Alan Sykes, ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’, 66 University of Chicago Law Review 1 (1999).
2. Joost Pauwelyn, ‘Cross-agreement Complaints before the Appellate Body: A Case Study of the EC – Asbestos Dispute’, 1 World Trade Review (2002), 63.
3. Aaditya Mattoo, ‘Shaping Future Rules for Trade in Services, Lessons from the GATS’ (mimeo, World Bank, July 2000) and Pierre Sauve and Robert Stern (eds), GATS 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2000).
4. Aaditya Mattoo and Pierre Sauve (eds), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003)
5. Markus Krajewski, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services: The Legal Impact of the GATS on National Regulatory Autonomy (Kluwer Law International, 2003).
6. Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003), 399–405.
7. Michael Lennard, ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law (2002), 17–89
8. Aaditya Mattoo, ‘National Treatment in the GATS: Corner-stone or Pandora's Box?’, 31 Journal of World Trade (1997), 107–135.