Development of the functional recovery index for ambulatory surgery and anesthesia

Anesthesiology

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 596-602

  Wong, Jean ^a   Tong, Doris ^a   De Silva, Yoshani ^a   Abrishami, Amir ^a   Chung, Frances ^a  

^a TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVALESCENCE; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY INDEX; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAJOR SURGERY; MALE; MINOR SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURGICAL PATIENT; VALIDITY; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62349105769     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318197a16d     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chung F, Un V, Su J: Postoperative symptoms 24 hours after ambulatory anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43:1121-7
2. Chung F: Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:896-902
3. Fortier J, Chung F: Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery: A prospective study. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:612-9
4. Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F: A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements afterambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg2007; 105:63-9
5. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL: Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:83-90
6. Dexter F, Aker J, Wright WA: Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care: The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:865-73
7. Fung D, Cohen MM: Measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: A review of current methodology. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:1089-98
8. Hogue SL, Reese PR, Colopy M, Fleisher LA, Tuman KJ, Twersky RS, Warner DS, Jamerson B: Assessing a tool to measure patient functional ability after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:97-106
9. Swan BA, Maislin G, Traber K: Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:739-45
10. Oakes CL, Ellington KJ, Oakes KJ, Olson RL, Neill KM, Vacchiano CA: Assessment of post-anesthesia short-term quality of life: A pilot study. AANA J 2002; 70:267-73
11. Kleinbeck SVM: Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23:461-72
12. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S: Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. Br J Anesth 2000; 84:11-5
13. Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Wu AW: The surgical recovery index. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:596-600
14. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), III: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32:40-66
15. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473-83
16. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. Edited by Norman GR, Streiner DL. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book, 1994, pp 129-48
17. Streiner DL: Sample-size formulae for parametric estimation. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 78:275-84
18. Streiner D, Norman G: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 3rd edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 4-9, 19-22, 61-8, 119-23, 172-87
19. Nishisato N, Torii Y: Effects of categorizing continuous normal distributions on the product-moment correlation. Jpn Psychol Res 1970; 13:45-9
20. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R: Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002; 324:1417
21. Wilson IB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. JAMA 1995; 273:59-65
22. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), II: Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31:247-63
23. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS: The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19:787-805
24. Pollard WE, Bobbitt RA, Bergner M, Martin DP, Gilson BS: The Sickness Impact Profile: Reliability of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14:146-55
25. de Boer AG, van Lanschot JJ, Stalmeier PF: Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable, and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? Qual Life Res 2004; 13:311-20
26. Liang MH: Longitudinal construct validity: Establishment of a clinical meaning in patient evaluation instruments. Med Care 2000; 38:S84-90