Now that we're here, where are we? The JBI approach to evidence-based healthcare 20 years on

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 117-120

  Jordan, Zoe ^a   Munn, Zachary ^a   Aromataris, Edoardo ^a   Lockwood, Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evidence based; Methodological development; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; MODEL; ORGANIZATION; SYNTHESIS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84966311103     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000053     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Jordan Z, Donnelly P, Pittman E. A short history of a BIG idea: the Joanna Briggs Institute 1996-2006 Melbourne: Ausmed Publications; 2006
2. Pearson A. Basing practice on the evidence. Austr Nurs J 1997; 5: 22
3. Pearson A, Wiechula R, Court A, Lockwood C. The JBI model of evidence based healthcare. Int J Evidence Based Healthcare 2005; 3: 207-15
4. Pearson A. Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews. Int J Evidence Based Healthcare 2004; 2: 45-64
5. Nutley S, Powell A, Davies H. What counts as good evidence? Provocation paper for the alliance for useful evidence. Fife, Scotland: Research Unit for Research Utilisation (RURU), School of Management, University of St Andrews; 2013
6. Guyatt G, Glasziou P, Montori V, Schünemann H. When can we be confident about estimates of treatment effects? Med Roundtable Gen Med Ed 2014; 1: 178-84
7. Montori V. Is the hierarchy of evidence pyramid dead? 11 April 2015, 11.08 am. Tweet https://twitter.com/vmontori/ status/586954070537056257
8. The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party (2014). Supporting document for the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. The Joanna Briggs Institute. www.joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/approach/Levelsof-Evidence-SupportingDocuments-v@.pdf. [Accessed 21 March 2015]
9. GRADE Working Group. Education and debate-grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490
10. Elliott J, Sim I, Thomas J, et al. #CochraneTech: technology of systematic reviews [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 9: ED000091
11. Elliott JH, Turner T, Clavisi O, et al. Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001603
12. Long L. Routine piloting in systematic reviews-a modified approach. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 77