Routine piloting in systematic reviews-A modified approach?

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Long, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data extraction; Efficiency; Methodology; Pilot systematic review; Piloting; Systematic review; Validity

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

DATA EXTRACTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME; LITERATURE; PROCEDURES;

INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PILOT PROJECTS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84927933543     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-77     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Egger M, Smith G, Altman D. Systematic Reviews in Health Care, Meta-Analysis in Context 2008, London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2.
2. Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N. When and how to update systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, 23(1). MR000023.
3. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York: Systematic reviews 2009, ork: CRD: In CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
4. Elliot JH, Mavergames C, Becker L, Meerpohl J, Thomas J, Green R, Tovey D. The automation of systematic reviews: achieving high quality and efficient systematic review through technological innovation. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
5. Ghersi D, Pang T. From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration. J Evid Based Med 2009, 2(1):1-7.
6. Bastian H, Glaszlou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?. PLoS Med 2010, 7(9):e1000326.
7. Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews 2012, London: Sage Publications.
8. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, [http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/prospero.asp], Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.
9. Bonell C, Oakley J, Hargreaves J, Strange V, Rees R. Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review. BMJ 2006, 333(7563):346-349.
10. Thomas JM, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Applications of text mining within systematic reviews. Res Synth Method 2011, 2(1):1-14.
11. Ip S, Hadar N, Keefe S, Parkin C, Iovin R, Balk EM, Lau J. A web-based archive of systematic review data. Syst Rev 2012, 1(21):15.
12. Mavergames C, Becker L. Cochrane Linked Data Project: From "Star Trek" to the Present 2014, Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration.
13. Welsh E. Saving time during development of Cochrane protocols. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
14. Churchill R, Higgins J, Chandler J, Tovey D, Lasserson T. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) [http://www.editorial-unit.cochrane.org/mecir].
15. Tsafnat G, Dunn A, Glasziou P, Coiera E. The automation of systematic reviews. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
16. Clark AM. Re: the automation of systematic reviews: get real. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
17. Barreto PS. "Brave New World" for systematic reviews?. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
18. Haykowsky M, Liang Y, Pechter D, Jones L, McAlister F, Clark AM. A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodelling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:2329-2336.
19. Thomas JM, O'Mara-Eves A, McNaught J, Ananiadou S. Re: the automation of systematic reviews. BMJ 2013, 346:f139.
20. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective 2006, London: Sage Publications.