Protrusive waves guide 3D cell migration along nanofibers

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 211, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 683-701

  Guetta Terrier, Charlotte ^a   Monzo, Pascale ^a   Zhu, Jie ^b   Long, Hongyan ^c   Venkatraman, Lakshmi ^a   Zhou, Yue ^e,f   Wang, PeiPei ^e,f   Chew, Sing Yian ^c,d   Mogilner, Alexander ^g   Ladoux, Benoit ^a,h   Gauthier, Nils C ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Nanyang Technological University   (Singapore)

^d NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^e NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^f Dept Medicine Endocrinol Diabet   (Singapore)

^g NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h INSTITUT JACQUES MONOD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; FIBRONECTIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; NANOFIBER;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL BODY; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOTILITY; CELLS BY BODY ANATOMY; ELECTROSPINNING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINDLE CELL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WAVEFORM; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; DOG; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HEK293 CELL LINE; HELA CELL LINE; MDCK CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PC12 CELL LINE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR CELL LINE; UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELL;

3T3 CELLS; ACTINS; ACTOMYOSIN; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MOVEMENT; DOGS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBRONECTINS; HEK293 CELLS; HELA CELLS; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; MADIN DARBY CANINE KIDNEY CELLS; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; PC12 CELLS; RATS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84966305765     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201501106     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Abreu-Blanco, M.T., J.M. Verboon, and S.M. Parkhurst. 2011. Cell wound repair in Drosophila occurs through three distinct phases of membrane and cytoskeletal remodeling. J. Cell Biol. 193:455-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011018.
2. Allard, J., and A. Mogilner. 2013. Traveling waves in actin dynamics and cell motility. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25:107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.012.
3. Atilgan, E., D. Wirtz, and S.X. Sun. 2005. Morphology of the lamellipodium and organization of actin filaments at the leading edge of crawling cells. Biophys. J. 89:3589-3602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.065383.
4. Baumann, K. 2010. Cell migration: Moving in 3D. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2925
5. Bergert, M., S.D. Chandradoss, R.A. Desai, and E. Paluch. 2012. Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.109:14434-14439.
6. Bergert, M., A. Erzberger, R.A. Desai, I.M. Aspalter, A.C. Oates, G. Charras, G. Salbreux, and E.K. Paluch. 2015. Force transmission during adhesion- independent migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:524-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb3134.
7. Borisy, G.G., and T.M. Svitkina. 2000. Actin machinery: Pushing the envelope. Curr Opin. Cell Biol. 12:104-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00063-0.
8. Burke, T.A., J.R. Christensen, E. Barone, C. Suarez, V. Sirotkin, and D.R. Kovar. 2014. Homeostatic actin cytoskeleton networks are regulated by assembly factor competition for monomers. Curr Biol. 24:579-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.072.
9. Cao, H., T. Liu, and S.Y. Chew. 2009. The application of nanofibrous scaffolds in neural tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61:1055-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.009.
10. Carmona-Fontaine, C., H.K. Matthews, S. Kuriyama, M. Moreno, G.A. Dunn, M. Parsons, C.D. Stern, and R. Mayor. 2008. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature. 456:957-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07441.
11. Case, L.B., and C.M. Waterman. 2011. Adhesive F-actin waves: A novel integrin- mediated adhesion complex coupled to ventral actin polymerization. PLoS One. 6:e26631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026631.
12. Charras, G., and E. Paluch. 2008. Blebs lead the way: How to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:730-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2453.
13. Charras, G., and E. Sahai. 2014. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:813-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3897.
14. Chew, S.Y., T.C. Hufnagel, C.T. Lim, and K.W. Leong. 2006a. Mechanical properties of single electrospun drug-encapsulated nanofibres. Nanotechnology. 17:3880-3891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/045.
15. Chew, S.Y., Y. Wen, Y. Dzenis, and K.W. Leong. 2006b. The role of electrospinning in the emerging field of nanomedicine. Curr. Pharm. Des. 12:4751-4770. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161206779026326.
16. Choi, C.K., M. Vicente-Manzanares, J. Zareno, L.A. Whitmore, A. Mogilner, and A.R. Horwitz. 2008. Actin and alpha-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:1039-1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1763.
17. DeMali, K.A., C.A. Barlow, and K. Burridge. 2002. Recruitment of the Arp2/3 complex to vinculin: Coupling membrane protrusion to matrix adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 159:881-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200206043.
18. Diz-Munoz, A., D.A. Fletcher, and O.D. Weiner. 2013. Use the force: membrane tension as an organizer of cell shape and motility. Trends Cell Biol. 23:47-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.09.006.
19. Dobereiner, H.G., B.J. Dubin-Thaler, J.M. Hofman, H.S. Xenias, T.N. Sims, G. Giannone, M.L. Dustin, C.H. Wiggins, and M.P. Sheetz. 2006. Lateral membrane waves constitute a universal dynamic pattern of motile cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97:038102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.038102.
20. Doyle, A.D., F.W. Wang, K. Matsumoto, and K.M. Yamada. 2009. Onedimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 184:481-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200810041.
21. Doyle, A.D., M.L. Kutys, M.A. Conti, K. Matsumoto, R.S. Adelstein, and K.M. Yamada. 2012. Micro-environmental control of cell migrationmyosin IIA is required for efficient migration in fibrillar environments through control of cell adhesion dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 125:2244-2256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.098806.
22. Doyle, A.D., R.J. Petrie, M.L. Kutys, and K.M. Yamada. 2013. Dimensions in cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25:642-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2013.06.004.
23. Edmondson, J.C., and M.E. Hatten. 1987. Glial-guided granule neuron migration in vitro: A high-resolution time-lapse video microscopic study. J. Neurosci. 7:1928-1934.
24. Even-Ram, S., and K.M. Yamada. 2005. Cell migration in 3D matrix. Curr Opin. Cell Biol. 17:524-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.015.
25. Flynn, K.C., C.W. Pak, A.E. Shaw, F. Bradke, and J.R. Bamburg. 2009. Growth conelike waves transport actin and promote axonogenesis and neurite branching. Dev. Neurobiol. 69:761-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20734.
26. Friedl, P., and K. Wolf. 2003. Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3:362-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1075.
27. Garcia, A.L. 2000. Numerical Methods for Physics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 423 pp.
28. Ghibaudo, M., J.M. Di Meglio, P. Hersen, and B. Ladoux. 2011. Mechanics of cell spreading within 3D-micropatterned environments. Lab Chip. 11:805-812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C0LC00221F.
29. Ghosh, K., and D.E. Ingber. 2007. Micromechanical control of cell and tissue development: implications for tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59:1306-1318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.addr.2007.08.014.
30. Giannone, G., B.J. Dubin-Thaler, H.G. Dobereiner, N. Kieffer, A.R. Bresnick, and M.P. Sheetz. 2004. Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves. Cell. 116:431-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00058-3.
31. Giannone, G., B.J. Dubin-Thaler, O. Rossier, Y. Cai, O. Chaga, G. Jiang, W. Beaver, H.G. Dobereiner, Y. Freund, G. Borisy, and M.P. Sheetz. 2007. Lamellipodial actin mechanically links myosin activity with adhesion-site formation. Cell. 128:561-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.039.
32. Gov, N.S., and A. Gopinathan. 2006. Dynamics of membranes driven by actin polymerization. Biophys. J. 90:454-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.062224.
33. Govek, E.E., M.E. Hatten, and L. Van Aelst. 2011. The role of Rho GTPase proteins in CNS neuronal migration. Dev. Neurobiol. 71:528-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20850.
34. Higgins, A.M., B.L. Banik, and J.L. Brown. 2015. Geometry sensing through POR1 regulates Rac1 activity controlling early osteoblast differentiation in response to nanofiber diameter. Integr Biol (Camb). 7:229-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C41B00225C.
35. Ilina, O., and P. Friedl. 2009. Mechanisms of collective cell migration at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122:3203-3208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.036525.
36. Jacobson, K., A. Ishihara, and R. Inman. 1987. Lateral diffusion of proteins in membranes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 49:163-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.49.030187.001115.
37. Kabaso, D., R. Shlomovitz, K. Schloen, T. Stradal, and N.S. Gov. 2011. Theoretical model for cellular shapes driven by protrusive and adhesive forces. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7:e 1001127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001127.
38. Katsuno, H., M. Toriyama, Y. Hosokawa, K. Mizuno, K. Ikeda, Y. Sakumura, and N. Inagaki. 2015. Actin Migration Driven by Directional Assembly and Disassembly of Membrane-Anchored Actin Filaments. Cell Reports. 12:648-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.048.
39. Kelly, A.E., H. Kranitz, V. Dotsch, and R.D. Mullins. 2006. Actin binding to the central domain of WASP/Scar proteins plays a critical role in the activation of the Arp2/3 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 281:10589-10597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M507470200.
40. Koestler, S.A., K. Rottner, F. Lai, J. Block, M. Vinzenz, and J.V. Small. 2009. F- and G-actin concentrations in lamellipodia of moving cells. PLoS One. 4:e4810.http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004810.
41. Kolodney, M.S., and E.L. Elson. 1995. Contraction due to microtubule disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:10252-10256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.22.10252.
42. Krause, M., and A. Gautreau. 2014. Steering cell migration: Lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:577-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3861.
43. Lacayo, C.I., Z. Pincus, M.M. VanDuijn, C.A. Wilson, D.A. Fletcher, F.B. Gertler, A. Mogilner, and J.A. Theriot. 2007. Emergence of large-scale cell morphology and movement from local actin filament growth dynamics. PLoS Biol. 5:e233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050233.
44. Ladoux, B., and A. Nicolas. 2012. Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75:116-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/11/116601.
45. Lammermann, T., and M. Sixt. 2009. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:636-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003.
46. Lauffenburger, D.A., and A.F. Horwitz. 1996. Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 84:359-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81280-5.
47. Lee, Y.H., J.R. Huang, Y.K. Wang, and K.H. Lin. 2013. Three-dimensional fibroblast morphology on compliant substrates of controlled negative curvature. Integr Biol (Camb). 5:1447-1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ib40161h.
48. Li, D., Y.L. Wang, and Y.N. Xia. 2003. Electrospinning of polymeric and ceramic nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays. Nano Lett. 3:1167-1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/n10344256.
49. Li, D., Y.L. Wang, and Y.N. Xia. 2004. Electrospinning nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays and layer-by-layer stacked films. Adv. Mater. 16:361-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.200306226.
50. Lieber, A.D., S. Yehudai-Resheff, E.L. Barnhart, J.A. Theriot, and K. Keren. 2013. Membrane tension in rapidly moving cells is determined by cytoskeletal forces. Curr. Biol. 23:1409-1417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.063.
51. Liu, J., Y. Sun, D.G. Drubin, and G.F. Oster. 2009. The mechanochemistry of endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000204.
52. Liu, Y.J., M. Le Berre, F. Lautenschlaeger, P. Maiuri, A. Callan-Jones, M. Heuze, T. Takaki, R. Voituriez, and M. Piel. 2015. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell. 160:659-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007.
53. Maly, I.V., and G.G. Borisy. 2001. Self-organization of a propulsive actin network as an evolutionary process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:11324-11329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181338798.
54. Martin, P., and S.M. Parkhurst. 2004. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development. 131:3021-3034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01253.
55. Matthews, H.K., L. Marchant, C. Carmona-Fontaine, S. Kuriyama, J. Larraín, M.R. Holt, M. Parsons, and R. Mayor. 2008. Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by Syndecan-4/Rac1 and non- canonical Wnt signaling/RhoA. Development. 135:1771-1780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.017350.
56. Mitrossilis, D., J. Fouchard, A. Guiroy, N. Desprat, N. Rodriguez, B. Fabry, and A. Asnacios. 2009. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:18243-18248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903994106.
57. Mogilner, A. 2006. On the edge: Modeling protrusion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18:32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2005.11.001.
58. Mogilner, A., and L. Edelstein-Keshet. 2002. Regulation of actin dynamics in rapidly moving cells: A quantitative analysis. Biophys. J. 83:1237-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73897-6.
59. Muller, W.A. 2003. Leukocyte-endothelial-cell interactions in leukocyte transmigration and the inflammatory response. Trends Immunol. 24:327-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00117-0.
60. Nagy, T., V. Champattanachai, R.B. Marchase, and J.C. Chatham. 2006. Glucosamine inhibits angiotensin II-induced cytoplasmic Ca2+ elevation in neonatal cardiomyocytes via protein-associated O-linked N-acetylglucosamine. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290:C57-C65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00263.2005.
61. Ofer, N., A. Mogilner, and K. Keren. 2011. Actin disassembly clock determines shape and speed of lamellipodial fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:20394-20399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105333108.
62. Peleg, B., A. Disanza, G. Scita, and N. Gov. 2011. Propagating cell-membrane waves driven by curved activators of actin polymerization. PLoS One. 6:e18635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018635.
63. Petrie, R.J., and K.M. Yamada. 2012. At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 125:5917-5926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.093732.
64. Petrie, R.J., N. Gavara, R.S. Chadwick, and K.M. Yamada. 2012. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 197:439-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201201124.
65. Petrie, R.J., H. Koo, and K.M. Yamada. 2014. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science. 345:1062-1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1256965.
66. Poincloux, R., O. Collin, F. Lizárraga, M. Romao, M. Debray, M. Piel, and P. Chavrier. 2011. Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:1943-1948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010396108.
67. Pollard, T.D., and G.G. Borisy. 2003. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 112:453-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X.
68. Prass, M., K. Jacobson, A. Mogilner, and M. Radmacher. 2006. Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell. J. Cell Biol. 174:767-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200601159.
69. Rabodzey, A., P. Alcaide, F.W. Luscinskas, and B. Ladoux. 2008. Mechanical forces induced by the transendothelial migration of human neutrophils. Biophys. J. 95:1428-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.119156.
70. Ramaswamy, S., J. Toner, and J. Prost. 2000. Nonequilibrium fluctuations, traveling waves, and instabilities in active membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:3494-3497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3494.
71. Rottner, K., and T.E. Stradal. 2011. Actin dynamics and turnover in cell motility. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23:569-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.07.003.
72. Ruprecht, V., S. Wieser, A. Callan-Jones, M. Smutny, H. Morita, K. Sako, V. Barone, M. Ritsch-Marte, M. Sixt, R. Voituriez, and C.P. Heisenberg. 2015. Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell. 160:673-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.cell.2015.01.008.
73. Ruthel, G., and G. Banker. 1999. Role of moving growth cone-like "wave" structures in the outgrowth of cultured hippocampal axons and dendrites. J. Neurobiol. 39:97-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199904)39:1<97::AID-NEU8>3.0.CO;2-Z.
74. Sahai, E. 2005. Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15:87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2004.12.002.
75. Scott, B.J., E.M. Neidt, and D.R. Kovar. 2011. The functionally distinct fission yeast formins have specific actin-assembly properties. Mol. Biol. Cell. 22:3826-3839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0492.
76. Sharma, P., K. Sheets, S. Elankumaran, and A.S. Nain. 2013. The mechanistic influence of aligned nanofibers on cell shape, migration and blebbing dynamics of glioma cells. Integr Biol (Camb). 5:1036-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C31B40073E.
77. Sheetz, M.P., D.P. Felsenfeld, and C.G. Galbraith. 1998. Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 8:51-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(98)80005-6.
78. Shlomovitz, R., and N.S. Gov. 2007. Membrane waves driven by actin and Myosin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98:168-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.168103.
79. Small, J.V., K. Rottner, I. Kaverina, and K.I. Anderson. 1998. Assembling an actin cytoskeleton for cell attachment and movement. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1404:271-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00080-9.
80. Sykes, C., and J. Plastino. 2010. Cell biology: Actin filaments up against a wall. Nature. 464:365-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/464365a.
81. Thiery, J.P. 2003. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15:740-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.006.
82. Tomba, C., C. Brami, B. Wu, N.S. Gov, and C. Villard. 2014. Tuning the adhesive geometry of neurons: length and polarity control. Soft Matter. 10:2381-2387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52342j.
83. Vedula, S.R.K., M.C. Leong, T.L. Lai, P. Hersen, A.J. Kabla, C.T. Lim, and B. Ladoux. 2012. Emerging modes of collective cell migration induced by geometrical constraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:12974-12979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119313109.
84. Vitriol, E.A., L.M. McMillen, M. Kapustina, S.M. Gomez, D. Vavylonis, and J.Q. Zheng. 2015. Two functionally distinct sources of actin monomers supply the leading edge of lamellipodia. Cell Reports. 11:433-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.033.
85. Vogel, V., and M. Sheetz. 2006. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:265-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038nrm1890.
86. Wilson, K., A. Lewalle, M. Fritzsche, R. Thorogate, T. Duke, and G. Charras. 2013. Mechanisms of leading edge protrusion in interstitial migration. Nat. Commun. 4:28-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3896.
87. Wolf, K., and P. Friedl. 2009. Mapping proteolytic cancer cell-extracellular matrix interfaces. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 26:289-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10585-008-9190-2.
88. Wolf, K., M. Te Lindert, M. Krause, S. Alexander, J. Te Riet, A.L. Willis, R.M. Hoffman, C.G. Figdor, S.J. Weiss, and P. Friedl. 2013. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 201:1069-1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210152.
89. Wu, C., S.B. Asokan, M.E. Berginski, E.M. Haynes, N.E. Sharpless, J.D. Griffith, S.M. Gomez, and J.E. Bear. 2012. Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell. 148:973-987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.034.
90. Xue, N., C. Bertulli, A. Sadok, and Y.Y. Huang. 2014. Dynamics of filopodium- like protrusion and endothelial cellular motility on one-dimensional extracellular matrix fibrils. Interface Focus. 4:20130060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2013.0060.
91. Yamaguchi, H., M. Lorenz, S. Kempiak, C. Sarmiento, S. Coniglio, M. Symons, J. Segall, R. Eddy, H. Miki, T. Takenawa, and J. Condeelis. 2005. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: The role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J. Cell Biol. 168:441-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200407076.
92. Yevick, H.G., G. Duclos, I. Bonnet, and P. Silberzan. 2015. Architecture and migration of an epithelium on a cylindrical wire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112:5944-5949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418857112.
93. Zaman, M.H., L.M. Trapani, A.L. Sieminski, D. Mackellar, H. Gong, R.D. Kamm, A. Wells, D.A. Lauffenburger, and P. Matsudaira. 2006. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:10889-10894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604460103.
94. Zhang, Y.Z., B. Su, J. Venugopal, S. Ramakrishna, and C.T. Lim. 2007. Biomimetic and bioactive nanofibrous scaffolds from electrospun composite nanofibers. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2:623-638.
95. Zhong-Can, O.Y., and W. Helfrich. 1987. Instability and deformation of a spherical vesicle by pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59:2486-2488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2486.