Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: A qualitative study

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Mikal, Jude ^a   Hurst, Samantha ^b   Conway, Mike ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Depression; Ethics; Social networking; Twitter messaging

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; ETHICS; EXPECTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH; MONITORING; PRIVACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; ADULT; ATTITUDE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PRIVACY; SOCIAL MEDIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84966297211     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Desilver D. 5 facts about Twitter at age 10. 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/03/18/5-facts-about-twitter-at-age-10/. Accessed 11 Apr 2016.
2. Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X. Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci. 2011;2(1):1-8.
3. Esiyok C, Albayrak S. Twitter sentiment tracking for predicting marketing trends. In: Hopfgarter F, editor. Smart information systems: advances in computer vision and pattern recognition. Springer International Publishing; 2015:47-74.
4. Tumasjan A, Sprenger T, Sandner P, Welpe I. Predicting elections with Twitter: what 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC, USA. 2010. p. 178-85.
5. Wang H, Can D, Kazemzadeh A, Bar F, Narayanan S. A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of the 2012 US presidential election cycle. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Jeju, Republic of Korea. 2012. p. 115-20.
6. Kim DS, Kim JW. Public opinion sensing and trend analysis on social media: a study on nuclear power on Twitter. Int J Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng. 2014;9(11):373-84.
7. Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Fisher S, Salyer P, Grucza R, Bierut L. Twitter chatter about marijuana. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):139-45.
8. Dredze M. How social media will change public health. IEEE Intell Syst. 2012;4(27):81-4.
9. Brownstein J, Freifeld C, Madoff L. Digital disease detection-harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2153-5. 2157.
10. Salathé M, Bengtsson L, Bodnar T, Brewer D, Brownstein J, Buckee C, Campbell E, Cattuto C, Khandelwal S, Mabry P, Vespignani A. Computational epidemiology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;56(7):88-96.
11. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1)e11.
12. Chunara R, Andrews J, Brownstein J. Social and news media enable estimation of epidemiological patterns early in the 2010 Haitian cholera outbreak. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(1):39-45.
13. Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the US during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19467.
14. Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e14118.
15. Collier N, Son NT, Nguyen NM. OMG U got flu? Analysis of shared health messages for bio-surveillance. J Biomed Semantics. 2011;2(5):1.
16. Yom-Tov E, Borsa D, Cox I, McKendry R. Detecting disease outbreaks in mass gatherings using Internet data. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6)e154.
17. West J, Hall P, Prier K, Hanson C, Giraud-Carrier C, Neeley E, Barnes M. Temporal variability of problem drinking on Twitter. Open J Preventive Med. 2012;2(1):43-8.
18. Myslín M, Zhu SH, Chapman W, Conway M. Using Twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8)e174.
19. Conway M, O'Connor D. Social media, big data, and mental health: current advances and ethical implications. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;9:77-82.
20. Jashinsky J, Burton S, Hanson C, West J, Giraud-Carrier C, Barnes M, Argyle T. Tracking suicide risk factors through Twitter in the US. Crisis 2014. 2014;35(1):51-9.
21. De Choudhury M, Counts S, Horvitz E. Social media as a measurement tool of depression in populations. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Web Science. Paris, France. 2013.
22. De Choudhury M, Gamon M, Counts S, Horvitz E. Predicting depression via social media. In: Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Boston, MA, USA. 2013. p. 47-56.
23. Coppersmith G, Dredze M, Harman C. Quantifying mental health signals in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. Baltimore, MD, USA. 2014. p. 51-60.
24. Martin JH, Jurafsky D. Speech and language processing. International Edition. Prentice-Hall; 2008.
25. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/ (Accessed 14 Sept 2015).
26. Kramera A, Guillory J, Hancock J. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. PNAS. 2014;111(24):8788-90.
27. Naomi L. The Lancet Technology: November, 2014, Trouble on the radar. The Lancet. 2014;384:e1917.
28. Eysenbach G, Till J. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1103-5.
29. Vayena E, Salathé M, Madoff L, Brownstein J. Ethical challenges of big data in public health. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(2):e1003904.
30. Conway M. Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12)e290.
31. Beninger K, Fry A, Jago N, Lepps H, Nass L, Silvester H. Research using social media; users' views. Nat Cen Social Research. 2014.
32. Evans H, Ginnis S, Bartlett J. #Socialethics: a guide to embedding ethics into social media research. Retrieved from http://www.ahrecs.com/resources/1342. (Accessed 11 Apr 2016).
33. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311(7000):299-302.
34. Duggan M, and Smith A. "6 % of online adults are Reddit users." Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/03/6-of-online-adults-are-reddit-users/ (Accessed 4 Apr 2013).
35. Hennink M. Emergent issues in international focus group discussion. Handb emergent methods. 2008;2008:207-20.
36. Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1979.
37. McCaslin M, Wilson SK. The Five-Question Method for Framing a Qualitative Research Study. Qual Rep. 2003;8(3):447-61.
38. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000. 2000;320(7227):114.
39. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391-409.
40. Chen G. Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(2):755-62.
41. Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006;21(1):140.
42. Pagani M, Hofacker C, Goldsmith R. The influence of personality on active and passive use of social networking sites. Psychol Mark. 2011;28(5):441-56.
43. Weaver SD, Gahegan M. Constructing, Visualizing, and Analyzing a Digital Footprint∗. Geogr Rev. 2007;97(3):324-50.
44. O'Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):800-4.
45. Howard N, Busch L, Sheets P. Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Can J Commun. 2010;2010:35(1).
46. Hargittai E. Digital na (t) ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the "net generation"∗. Sociol Inq. 2010;80(1):92-113.
47. Lane J, Stodden V, Bender S, Nissenbaum H, editors. Privacy, big data and the public good: framework for engagement. Cambridge University Press. 2014.