Explore, synthesize, and repeat: Unraveling complex water management issues through the stakeholder engagement wheel

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Mott Lacroix, Kelly E ^a   Megdal, Sharon B ^a  

^a Environmental Research Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Social learning; Stakeholder engagement; Water management

Indexed keywords

ITERATIVE METHODS; WATER RESOURCES; WHEELS;

MANAGEMENT ISSUES; ROBUST DECISIONS; SHARED UNDERSTANDING; SOCIAL LEARNING; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER INTEREST; STEERING COMMITTEE; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

WATER MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LEARNING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 84965176810     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w8040118     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Lennox, J.; Proctor, W.; Russell, S. Structuring Stakeholder Participation in New Zealand'sWater Resource Governance. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70.
2. Antunes, P.; Kallis, G.; Videira, N.; Santos, R. Participation and Evaluation for Sustainable River Basin Governance. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68.
3. Fischer, A.R.; Wentholt, M.T.; Rowe, G.; Frewer, L.J. Expert Involvement in Policy Development: A Systematic Review of Current Practice. Sci. Public Policy 2013.
4. Pahl-Wostl, C. A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-Level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19.
5. Turton, A.R.; Hattingh, J.; Claassen, M.; Roux, D.J.; Ashton, P.J. Towards a Model for Ecosystem Governance: An IntegratedWater Resource Management Example. In Governance as a Trialogue: Government-Society-Science in Transition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 1-28.
6. Mathur, V.N.; Price, A.D.; Austin, S. Conceptualizing Stakeholder Engagement in the Context of Sustainability and Its Assessment. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2008, 26.
7. Bos, J.J.; Brown, R.R.; Farrelly, M.A. A Design Framework for Creating Social Learning Situations. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23.
8. Kumler, L.M.; Lemos, M.C. Managing Waters of the Paraíba Do Sul River Basin, Brazil: A Case Study in Institutional Change and Social Learning. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13, 22.
9. Reed, M.; Evely, A.C.; Cundill, G.; Fazey, I.R.A.; Glass, J.; Laing, A.; Newig, J.; Parrish, B.; Prell, C.; Raymond, C.; et al. What Is Social Learning? Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, r1.
10. Berkes, F. Evolution of Co-Management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90.
11. Sternlieb, F.; Bixler, R.P.; Huber-Stearns, H. A Question of Fit: Reflections on Boundaries, Organizations and Social-Ecological Systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 130.
12. Jacobs, K.; Lebel, L.; Buizer, J.; Addams, L.; Matson, P.; McCullough, E.; Garden, P.; Saliba, G.; Finan, T. Linking Knowledge with Action in the Pursuit of Sustainable Water-Resources Management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010.
13. Miller, C. Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2001, 26.
14. Carr, A.; Wilkinson, R. Beyond Participation: Boundary Organizations as a New Space for Farmers and Scientists to Interact. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2005, 18.
15. Lacroix, K.E.M.; Xiu, B.C.; Megdal, S.B. Building Common Ground for Environmental Flows using Traditional Techniques and Novel Engagement Approaches. Environ. Manag. 2016, 57.
16. Childs, C.; York, A.M.; White, D.; Schoon, M.L.; Bodner, G.S. Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18.
17. Reed, M.S. Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141.
18. Areizaga, J.; Sano, M.; Medina, R.; Juanes, J. Improving Public Engagement in ICZM: A Practical Approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 109.
19. Jolibert, C.; Wesselink, A. Research Impacts and Impact on Research in Biodiversity Conservation: The Influence of Stakeholder Engagement. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 22.
20. Thought Stream. Five Criteria for Effective Stakeholder Engagement in Education. 2013. Available online: http://www.thoughtstream.ca/downloads/5-criteria-for-effective-se-may2013.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2014).
21. Jeffery, N. Stakeholder Engagement: A Road Map to Meaningful Engagement. Doughty Centre, Cranfield University School of Management, 2009. Available online: http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic-content/research/doughty/stakeholder/Guide.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2016).
22. Muro, M.; Jeffrey, P. Time to Talk? How the Structure of Dialog Processes Shapes Stakeholder Learning in Participatory Water Resources Management. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17.
23. Fung, A. Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Admin. Rev. 2006, 66, 66-75.
24. Durham, E.; Baker, H.; Smith, M.; Moore, E.; Morgan, V. BiodivERsA Stakeholder Engagement Handbook; BiddivERsA: Paris, France, 2014.
25. Stakeholder Research Associates Canada Inc. From Words to Action: The Stakeholder Engagement Manual Volume 1; Stakeholder Research Associates Canada Inc.: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2005.
26. Moreno, M.; Arizona Department ofWater Resources, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Personal communication, 2015.
27. Megdal, S.B.; Gerlak, A.K.; Varady, R.G.; Huang, L.Y. Groundwater Governance in the United States: Common Priorities and Challenges. Groundwater 2015, 53.
28. Pearce, K.L. Balancing Competing Interests: The History of State and Federal Water Laws. In Arizona Water Policy: Management Innovations in an Urbanizing, Arid Region, 1st ed.; Jacobs, K., Colby, B.G., Eds.; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 26-44.
29. Glennon, R. The Disconnect between Water Law and Hydrology. In Arizona Water Policy: Management Innovations in an Urbanizing, Arid Region, 1st ed.; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 106-120.
30. Mott Lacroix, K.E.; Xiu, B.C.; Nadeau, J.B.; Megdal, S.B. Synthesizing environmental flow needs data for water management in a water-scarce state: The Arizona Environmental Water Demands Database. River Res. Appl. 2016, 32.
31. Colby, B.G.; Thorson, J.E.; Britton, S. Negotiating Tribal Water Rights: Fulfilling Promises in the Arid West; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2005.
32. Arizona Department of Water Resources. Arizona Water Atlas Volume 3: Southeastern Arizona Planning Area; Arizona Department ofWater Resources: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2009; p. 619.
33. Bannister, K.; Chan, D.; Driscoll, J.M.; Fullerton, C.; Lien, A.; Lacroix, K.M. Atlas of the Upper Gila River Watershed; University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2014.
34. Lacroix, K.M.; Hullinger, A.; Fullerton, C. Scenarios for Upper Gila River Watershed; University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2014.
35. Von Gausig, D.; O'Banion, B.; Rooney, C. Verde River Economic Development Final Report. 2011. Available online: http://clarkdalesustainabilitypark.org/Verde%20River%20Reports%202011/VREDS%20Final%20Report-public-8-12-2011.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2015).
36. Lacroix, K.M.; Fullerton, C.; Rupprecht, C. Town of Clarkdale Water Resources Management Program Recommendations Report; University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2014.
37. Saarikoski, H.; Tikkanen, J.; Leskinen, L.A. Public Participation in Practice-Assessing Public Participation in the Preparation of Regional Forest Programs in Northern Finland. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12.
38. Scott, C.A.; Varady, R.G.; Meza, F.; Montaña, E.; de Raga, G.B.; Luckman, B.; Martius, C. Science-Policy Dialogues for Water Security: Addressing Vulnerability and Adaptation to Global Change in the Arid Americas. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2012, 54.
39. Walker, G.B.; Senecah, S.L.; Daniels, S.E. From the Forest to the River: Citizens' Views of Stakeholder Engagement. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2006, 13, 193-202.
40. De Stefano, L. Facing the Water Framework Directive Challenges: A Baseline of Stakeholder Participation in the European Union. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91.
41. Walter, A.I.; Helgenberger, S.; Wiek, A.; Scholz, R.W. Measuring Societal Effects of Transdisciplinary Research Projects: Design and Application of an Evaluation Method. Eval. Program Plan. 2007, 30.
42. Arnstein, S.R. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 35.
43. Luyet, V.; Schlaepfer, R.; Parlange, M.B.; Buttler, A. A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111.
44. Larson, S.; Williams, L.J. Monitoring the Success of Stakeholder Engagement: Literature Review. In People, Communities and Economies of the Lake Eyre Basin; DKCRC Research Report 45; Measham, T.G., Brake, L., Eds.; Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre: Alice Springs, Australia, 2009; pp. 251-298.
45. Slocum, N. Participatory Methods Toolkit: A Practitioner's Manual. King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment, 2003. Available online: http://archive.unu.edu/hq/library/Collection/PDF_files/CRIS/PMT.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2014).
46. Burgin, S.; Webb, T.; Rae, D. Stakeholder Engagement inWater Policy: Lessons from Peri-Urban Irrigation. Land Use Policy 2013, 31.
47. Susskind, L.; Camacho, A.E.; Schenk, T. A Critical Assessment of Collaborative Adaptive Management in Practice: Collaborative Adaptive Management. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49.
48. Bawole, J.N. Public Hearing or "Hearing Public"? An Evaluation of the Participation of Local Stakeholders in Environmental Impact Assessment of Ghana's Jubilee Oil Fields. Environ. Manag. 2013, 52.
49. Innes, J.E.; Booher, D.E. Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Plan. Theory Pract. 2004, 5.
50. Cundill, G. Monitoring Social Learning Processes in Adaptive Comanagement: Three Case Studies from South Africa. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15, 28.
51. Gleason, M.; McCreary, S.; Miller-Henson, M.; Ugoretz, J.; Fox, E.; Merrifield, M.; McClintock, W.; Serpa, P.; Hoffman, K. Science-Based and Stakeholder-Driven Marine Protected Area Network Planning: A Successful Case Study from North Central California. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2010, 53.
52. Jackson, S.; Tan, P.L.; Mooney, C.; Hoverman, S.; White, I. Principles and Guidelines for Good Practice in Indigenous Engagement in Water Planning. J. Hydrol. 2012, 474.
53. Bartels, W.; Furman, C.A.; Royce, F.; Ortiz, B.; Zierden, D.; Fraisse, C. Developing a Learning Community: Lessons from a Climate Working Group for Agriculture in the Southeast USA. Available online: http://www.seclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/2012-bartels-et-al-secc-technical-seriesdeveloping-a-learning-community.pdf (accessed on 22 march 2016).
54. Jacobs, M.H.; Buijs, A.E. Understanding Stakeholders' Attitudes towardWater Management Interventions: Role of Place Meanings: Stakeholders' attitudes toward water management. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47.