Attractor network dynamics enable preplay and rapid path planning in maze-like environments

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 1684-1692

  Corneil, Dane ^a   Gerstner, Wulfram ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LOCATION; MAMMALS; NEURONS;

ACTIVITY PROFILE; ATTRACTOR NETWORKS; GOAL DIRECTED; GRADIENT ASCENT; KNOWN ENVIRONMENTS; MAZE-LIKE ENVIRONMENT; NETWORK PROPERTIES; VALUE FUNCTIONS;

MOTION PLANNING;

EID: 84965105970     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. William Beecher Scoville and Brenda Milner. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 20(1):11, 1957.
2. Howard Eichenbaum. Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. MIT press, 1993.
3. John O'Keefe and Jonathan Dostrovsky. The hippocampus as a spatial map. preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain research, 34(1):171-175, 1971.
4. Kazu Nakazawa, Linus D Sun, Michael C Quirk, Laure Rondi-Reig, Matthew A Wilson, and Susumu Tonegawa. Hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors are crucial for memory acquisition of one-time experience. Neuron, 38(2):305-315, 2003.
5. Toshiaki Nakashiba, Jennie Z Young, Thomas J McHugh, Derek L Buhl, and Susumu Tonegawa. Transgenic inhibition of synaptic transmission reveals role of ca3 output in hippocampal learning. Science, 319(5867):1260-1264, 2008.
6. Tobias Bast, Iain A Wilson, Menno P Witter, and Richard GM Morris. From rapid place learning to behavioral performance: a key role for the intermediate hippocampus. PLoS biology, 7(4):e1000089, 2009.
7. Alexei Samsonovich and Bruce L McNaughton. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(15):5900-5920, 1997.
8. Kirsten Brun Kjelstrup, Trygve Solstad, Vegard Heimly Brun, Torkel Hafting, Stefan Leutgeb, Menno P Witter, Edvard I Moser, and May-Britt Moser. Finite scale of spatial representation in the hippocampus. Science, 321(5885):140-143, 2008.
9. Brad E Pfeiffer and David J Foster. Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature, 497(7447):74-79, 2013.
10. Andrew M Wikenheiser and A David Redish. Hippocampal theta sequences reflect current goals. Nature neuroscience, 2015.
11. Louis-Emmanuel Martinet, Denis Sheynikhovich, Karim Benchenane, and Angelo Arleo. Spatial learning and action planning in a prefrontal cortical network model. PLoS computational biology, 7(5):e1002045, 2011.
12. Filip Ponulak and John J Hopfield. Rapid, parallel path planning by propagating wavefronts of spiking neural activity. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 7, 2013.
13. Peter Dayan. Improving generalization for temporal difference learning: The successor representation. Neural Computation, 5(4):613-624, 1993.
14. Kimberly L Stachenfeld, Matthew Botvinick, and Samuel J Gershman. Design principles of the hippocampal cognitive map. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 2528-2536. Curran Associates, Inc., 2014.
15. Mathias Franzius, Henning Sprekeler, and Laurenz Wiskott. Slowness and sparseness lead to place, head-direction, and spatial-view cells. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(8):e166, 2007.
16. Fabian Schoenfeld and Laurenz Wiskott. Modeling place field activity with hierarchical slow feature analysis. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 9:51, 2015.
17. Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. Introduction to reinforcement learning. MIT Press, 1998.
18. Ronald R Coifman and Stéphane Lafon. Diffusion maps. Applied and computational harmonic analysis, 21(1):5-30, 2006.
19. Sridhar Mahadevan. Learning Representation and Control in Markov Decision Processes, volume 3. Now Publishers Inc, 2009.
20. Henning Sprekeler. On the relation of slow feature analysis and laplacian eigenmaps. Neural computation, 23(12):3287-3302, 2011.
21. John Conklin and Chris Eliasmith. A controlled attractor network model of path integration in the rat. Journal of computational neuroscience, 18(2):183-203, 2005.
22. Nicholas J Gustafson and Nathaniel D Daw. Grid cells, place cells, and geodesic generalization for spatial reinforcement learning. PLoS computational biology, 7(10):e1002235, 2011.
23. Chris Eliasmith and C Charles H Anderson. Neural engineering: Computation, representation, and dynamics in neurobiological systems. MIT Press, 2004.
24. Henning Sprekeler, Christian Michaelis, and Laurenz Wiskott. Slowness: an objective for spike-timing-dependent plasticity. PLoS Comput Biol, 3(6):e112, 2007.
25. Patrick J Drew and LF Abbott. Extending the effects of spike-timing-dependent plasticity to behavioral timescales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23):8876-8881, 2006.
26. Phillip Larimer and Ben W Strowbridge. Representing information in cell assemblies: persistent activity mediated by semilunar granule cells. Nature neuroscience, 13(2):213-222, 2010.
27. Robert Urbanczik and Walter Senn. Learning by the dendritic prediction of somatic spiking. Neuron, 81(3):521-528, 2014.