Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach's Alpha

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 163-173

  Vaske, Jerry J ^a   Beaman, Jay ^a   Sponarski, Carly C ^b  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cronbach's alpha; inconsistent responses; internal consistency

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH METHOD;

EID: 84965038564     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brown, B., & Raymond, C., (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values:Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27, 89–111.
2. Budruk, M., & Stanis, S. A., (2013). Place attachment and recreation experience preference:A further exploration of the relationship. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1–2, 51–61.
3. Cortina, J. M., (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
4. Cronbach, L. J., (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–324.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, J. R., (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391–418.
6. *Davis, S. K., Donnelly, M. P., & Vaske, J. J., (2015). The influence of place attachment on resident perceptions of tourism. Unpublished manuscript.
7. Dawes, J., (2002). Five point vs. eleven point scales:Does it make a difference to data characteristics. Australian Journal of Market Research, 10, 1–17.
8. DeVellis, R., (2003). Scale development:Theory and applications. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
9. Green, S. B., & Thompson, M., (2005). Structural equation modeling in clinical psychology research. In M., Roberts & S., Ilardi (Eds.), Handbook of research in clinical psychology. Oxford, England:Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. A., (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838.
11. Greenberg, D. W., & Anderson, J. C., (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.
12. Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R., (1970). Rating scales and information recovery–how many scales and response categories to use? Journal of Marketing, 34, 33–39.
13. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C., (2006). A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions:Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 79, 316–327.
14. Komorita, S. S., & Graham, W K., (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 987–995.
15. Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W., (1937). The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151–160.
16. Kyle, G., & Chick, G., (2007). The social construction of a sense of place. Leisure Sciences, 29, 209–225.
17. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R., (2004). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreation settings. Environment &Behavior, 37, 153–177.
18. Likert, R., (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 44–53.
19. Miller, M., (1995). Coefficient alpha:A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 255–273.
20. Nowlis, S. M., Kahn, B. E., & Dhvar, R., (2002). Coping with ambivlence:The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 319–334.
21. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H., (1994). Psychometric theory. (3rd ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
22. *Perry, E. E., Needham, M. D., Cramer, L. A., & Rosenberger, R. S., (2014). Coastal resident knowledge of new marine reserves in Oregon. Ocean & Coastal Management, 95, 107–116.
23. Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krasnick, J. A., (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree-disagree scales. Sociological Research & Methods, 43, 73–97.
24. Ritter, N. L., (2010). Understanding a widely misunderstood statistic:Cronbach's alpha. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Education Research Association, New Orleans, February 18.
25. Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Iles, R., (2003). Beyond alpha:An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8, 206–224.
26. Schmitt, N., (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.
27. Shelby, L. B., (2011). Beyond Cronbach's alpha:Considering confirmatory factor analysis and segmentation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16, 142–148.
28. Sijtsma, K., (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 107–120.
29. Spector, P. E., (1992). Summated rating scale construction. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
30. Streiner, D., (2003). Starting at the beginning:An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99–103.
31. Tate, R., (2003). A comparison of selected empirical methods for assessing the structure of responses to test items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 159–203.
32. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R., (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
33. *Taylor, J. G., Vaske, J. J., Shelby, L. B., Donnelly, M. P., & Browne- Nunez, C. M., (2002). Visitor response to demonstration fees at National Wildlife Refuges. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 1238–1244.
34. Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Socan, G., (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69, 613–625.
35. Thompson, B., (Ed.). (2003). Score reliability:Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
36. Vaske, J. J., (2008). Survey research and analysis:Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. State College, PA:Venture.
37. * Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C., (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 16–21.
38. * Vaske, J. J., Kneeshaw, K., Bright, A. D., & Absher, J. D., (2015). Generalizing outdoor recreation place attachment measures across three national forests. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J., (2003). The measurement of place attachment:Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830–840.
40. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E., (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor:Examining emotional and symbolic attachment of place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29–46.