A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 212, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 138-150

  Sajid, Muhammad S ^a   Khawaja, Amir H ^a   Sains, Parv ^a   Singh, Krishna K ^a   Baig, Mirza K ^a  

^a WORTHING HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adhesiolysis; Adhesions; Enterotomy; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy

Indexed keywords

ADHESIONAL SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION; ANGINA PECTORIS; ATELECTASIS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTESTINE INJURY; INTESTINE RESECTION; INTESTINE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC ADHESIOLYSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OPEN ADHESIOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK REDUCTION; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TISSUE ADHESION; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT FAILURE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMPLICATION; FEMALE; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT; SMALL INTESTINE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; CAUSE OF DEATH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; INTESTINE, SMALL; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE ADHESIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84965025536     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: 18791883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.030     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. 1 Ellis, H., The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Suppl 577 (1997), 5–9.
2. 2 Vettoretto, N., Carrara, A., Corradi, A., et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: consensus conference guidelines. Colorectal Dis 14 (2012), e208–e215.
3. 3 Miller, G., Boman, J., Shrier, I., et al. Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 180 (2000), 33–36.
4. 4 Farinella, E., Cirocchi, R., La Mura, F., et al. Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction. World J Emerg Surg 19 (2009), 43–50.
5. 5 Ghosheh, B., Salameh, J.R., Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc 21 (2007), 1945–1949.
6. 6 Suter, M., Zermatten, P., Halkic, N., et al. Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure?. Surg Endosc 14 (2000), 478–483.
7. 7 Fevang, B.T., Fevang, J., Lie, S.A., et al. Long term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 240 (2004), 193–201.
8. 8 Beck, D.E., Opelka, F.G., Bailey, H.R., et al. Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42 (1999), 241–248.
9. 9 Williams, S.B., Greenspon, J., Young, H.A., et al. Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 48 (2005), 1140–1146.
10. 10 Bastug, D.F., Trammell, S.W., Boland, J.P., et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1 (1991), 259–262.
11. 11 Nagle, A., Ujiki, M., Denham, W., et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 187 (2004), 464–470.
12. 12 Catena, F., Di Saverio, S., Kelly, M.D., et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2010 evidence-based guidelines of the world society of emergency surgery. World J Emerg Surg, 6, 2011, 5.
13. 13 Bohm, B., Milsom, J.W., Fazio, V.W., Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg 130 (1995), 415–419.
14. 14 Strickland, P., Lourie, D.J., Suddleson, E.A., et al. Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction?. Surg Endosc 13 (1999), 695–698.
15. 15 Burns, E.M., Currie, A., Bottle, A., et al. Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery. Br J Surg 100 (2013), 152–159.
16. 16 Garrard, C.L., Clements, R.H., Nanney, L., et al. Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13 (1999), 10–13.
17. 17 O'Connor, D.B., Winter, D.C., The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc 26 (2012), 12–17.
18. 18 In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed January 06, 2015.
19. 19 Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]. Version 5.0, 2008, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen.
20. 20 Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21 (2002), 1539–1558.
21. 21 Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Altman, D.G., Systematic Reviews in Healthcare. 2006, BMJ Publishing, London.
22. 22 Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., Bradburn, M.J., Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Altman, D.G., (eds.) Systemic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context, 2nd ed., 2001, BMJ Publication group, London, 285–312.
23. 23 Cochrane IMS. Available at: http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/otherresources/gradepro/download. Accessed Jaunary 06, 2015.
24. 24 Byrne, J., Saleh, F., Ambrosini, L., et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc 29 (2015), 2525–2532.
25. 25 Chopra, R., McVay, C., Phillips, E., et al. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 69 (2003), 966–968.
26. 26 Davies, S.W., Gillen, J.R., Guidry, C.A., et al. A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care centre. Am Surg 80 (2014), 261–269.
27. 27 Grafen, F.C., Neuhaus, V., Schöb, O., et al. Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395 (2010), 57–63.
28. 28 Johnson, K.N., Chapital, A.B., Harold, K.L., et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: evaluating the need for resection. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72 (2012), 25–30.
29. 29 Kelly, K.N., Iannuzzi, J.C., Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg Endosc 28 (2014), 65–73.
30. 30 Khaikin, M., Schneidereit, N., Cera, S., et al. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients' outcome and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc 21 (2007), 742–746.
31. 31 Lee, J., Tashijan, D.B., Moriarty, K.P., Surgical management of paediatric adhesive bowel obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22 (2012), 917–920.
32. 32 Lombardo, S., Baum, K., Filho, J.D., et al. Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76 (2014), 696–703.
33. 33 Mancini, G.J., Petroski, G.F., Lin, W.C., et al. Nationwide impact of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions in the management of intestinal obstruction in the US. J Am Coll Surg 207 (2008), 520–526.
34. 34 Mathieu, X., Thill, V., Simoens, C., et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study on 156 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 55 (2008), 522–526.
35. 35 Okamoto, H., Wakana, H., Kawashima, K., et al. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction. Asian J Endosc Surg 5 (2012), 53–58.
36. 36 Simmons, J.D., Rogers, E.A., Porter, J.M., et al. The role of laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction after previous laparotomy for trauma: an initial report. Am Surg 77 (2011), 185–187.
37. 37 Wullstein, C., Gross, E., Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90 (2003), 1147–1151.
38. 38 Menzies, D., Peritoneal adhesions: incidence, cause and prevention. Surg Annu 24 (1992), 27–45.
39. 39 Barkan, H., Webster, J., Ozeran, S., Factors predicting the recurrence of adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 170 (1995), 361–365.
40. 40 DeWilde, R.L., Goodbye to late bowel obstruction after appendectomy. Lancet, 338, 1991, 1012.
41. 41 Gutt, C.N., Oniu, T., Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure?. Surg Endosc 18 (2004), 898–906.
42. 42 Bailey, I.S., Rhodes, M., O'Rourke, N., et al. Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85 (1998), 84–87.
43. 43 Li, M.Z., Lian, L., Xiao, L.B., et al. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 204 (2012), 779–786.
44. 44 Wiggins, T., Markar, S.R., Harris, A., Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 29 (2015), 3432–3442.
45. 45 Sallinen, V., Wikström, H., Victorzon, M., et al. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction—a multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Surg, 14, 2014, 77.