In minor and major thoracic procedures is uniport superior to multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery?

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 550-555

  Akter, Farhana ^a   Routledge, Tom ^a   Toufektzian, Levon ^a   Attia, Rizwan ^a  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complications; Multiport; Outcomes; Pain; Uniport; Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; DICLOFENAC; MORPHINE;

ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; CHEST TUBE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYSTECTOMY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LOBECTOMY; LUNG BIOPSY; LUNG CANCER; MULTIPORT APPROACH; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIPHERAL LUNG LESION; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYMPATHECTOMY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THYMOMA; UNIPORT APPROACH; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; WOUND INFECTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COST CONTROL; DRAINAGE; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; LUNG RESECTION; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROCEDURES; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALGESICS; BENCHMARKING; COST SAVINGS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRAINAGE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PNEUMONECTOMY; RISK FACTORS; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84926627296     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu375     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dunning J, Prendgast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:405-9.
2. Li C, Ma H, He J, Ni B, Xu C, Zhao J. Clinical analysis of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of peripheral lung cancer with single utility port. Chin J Lung Cancer 2013;16:487-91.
3. McElnay PJ, Molyneux M, Krishnadas R, Batchelor TJ, West D, Casali G. Pain and recovery are comparable after either uniportal or multiport videoassisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an observation study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; doi:10. 1093/ejcts/ezu324.
4. Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Hashizume Y. Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;12:153.
5. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:63-6.
6. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs. standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:43-6.
7. Chen YB, Ye W, Yang WT, Shi L, Guo XF, Xu ZH et al. Uniportal versus biportal video assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J 2009;122:1525-8.
8. Mier JM, Chavarin A, Izquierdo-vidal C, Fibla JJ, Molins L. A prospective study comparing three-port video-assisted thoracoscopy with the singleincision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port and instruments for the video thoracoscopic approach: a pilot study. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2557-60.
9. Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery. Surg Endosc 2013;27:139-45.