Sporulation potential, symptom expression and detection of Phytophthora ramorum on larch needles and other foliar hosts

Plant Pathology

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1441-1451

  Harris, A R ^a   Webber, J F ^a  

^a FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

conifer; sudden larch death; susceptibility; symptomless infection

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; DECIDUOUS TREE; DETECTION METHOD; DIEBACK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EUKARYOTE; EVERGREEN TREE; GENE EXPRESSION; HOST PLANT; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INFECTIOUS DISEASE; LESION; MORTALITY; SPORULATION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

CASTANEA SATIVA; CONIFEROPHYTA; LARIX; LARIX KAEMPFERI; LAURUS NOBILIS; PHYTOPHTHORA; PHYTOPHTHORA RAMORUM; PSEUDOLARIX KAEMPFERI; RHODODENDRON PONTICUM; UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA; VACCINIUM MYRTILLUS;

EID: 84964786358     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12538     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anonymous, 2002. Commission Decision of 19 September 2002 on provisional emergency phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock & Man in ‘t Veld sp. nov. (notified under document number C(2002) 3380) (2002/757/EC). [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02002D0757-20131220]. Accessed 26 March 2016.
2. Brasier CM, Webber JF, 2010. Sudden larch death. Nature 466, 824–5.
3. Brasier CM, Beales PA, Kirk SA, Denman S, Rose J, 2005. Phytophthora kernoviae sp. nov., an invasive pathogen causing bleeding stem lesions on forest trees and foliar necrosis of ornamentals in Britain. Mycological Research 109, 1–7.
4. Brasier CM, Kirk SA, Rose J, 2006. Differences in the phenotypic stability and adaptive variation between the main European and American lineages of Phytophthora ramorum. In: Brasier CM, Jung T, Oßwald W, eds. Progress in Research on Phytophthora Disease of Forest Trees. Proceedings of the Third International IUFRO Working Party S07.02.09, Freising, Germany. Farnham, UK: Forest Research, 166–73.
5. Browning M, Englander L, Tooley PW, Berner D, 2008. Survival of Phytophthora ramorum hyphae after exposure to temperature extremes and various humidities. Mycologia 100, 236–45.
6. Davidson JM, Wickland AC, Patterson HA, Falk KR, Rizzo DM, 2005. Transmission of Phytophthora ramorum in mixed-evergreen forest in California. Phytopathology 95, 587–96.
7. Davidson JM, Patterson HA, Rizzo DM, 2008. Sources of inoculum for Phytophthora ramorum in a redwood forest. Phytopathology 98, 860–6.
8. Davidson JM, Patterson HA, Wickland AC, Fichtner EJ, Rizzo DM, 2011. Forest type influences transmission of Phytophthora ramorum in California oak woodlands. Phytopathology 101, 492–501.
9. Denman S, Kirk SA, Brasier CM, Webber JF, 2005. In vitro leaf inoculation studies as an indication of tree foliage susceptibility to Phytophthora ramorum in the UK. Plant Pathology 54, 512–21.
10. Denman S, Kirk S, Whybrow A, Orton E, Webber JF, 2006. Phytophthora kernoviae and P. ramorum: host susceptibility and sporulation potential on foliage of susceptible trees. EPPO Bulletin 36, 373–6.
11. Denman S, Moralejo E, Kirk SA, Orton E, Whybrow A, 2008. Sporulation of Phytophthora ramorum and P. kernoviae on asymptomatic foliage. In: Frankel SJ, Kliejunas JT, Palmieri KM, eds. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-214. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Third Science Symposium. Albany, CA, USA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 201–7.
12. Dileo MV, Bostock RM, Rizzo DM, 2009. Phytophthora ramorum does not cause physiologically significant systemic injury to California bay laurel, its primary reservoir host. Phytopathology 99, 1307–11.
13. Eckenwalder JE, 2009. Conifers of the World the Complete Reference. London, UK: Timber Press.
14. Fichtner EJ, Lynch SC, Rizzo DM, 2007. Detection, distribution, sporulation, and survival of Phytophthora ramorum in a California redwood-tanoak forest soil. Phytopathology 97, 1366–75.
15. Garbelotto M, Davidson JM, Ivors K et al., 2003. Non-oak native plants are the main hosts for sudden oak death pathogen in California. California Agriculture 57, 18–23.
16. Goss EM, Carbone I, Grünwald NJ, 2009. Ancient isolation and independent evolution of the three clonal lineages of the exotic sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Molecular Ecology 18, 1161–74.
17. Hansen E, Kanaskie A, Prospero S et al., 2008. Epidemiology of Phytophthora ramorum in Oregon tanoak forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 1133–43.
18. Hendrix JW, 1970. Sterols in growth and reproduction of fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology 8, 111–30.
19. Jenkins GJ, Perry MC, Prior MJ, 2008. The Climate of the United Kingdom and Recent Trends. Report no. UKCP09. Exeter, UK: Hadley Centre, Met Office.
20. Jinek A, Simard M, Watson AK, Tweddell RJ, Rioux D, 2011. Foliage susceptibility of six eastern Canadian forest tree species to Phytophthora ramorum. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 33, 26–37.
21. Manter DK, Kolodny EH, Hansen EM, Parke JL, 2010. Virulence, sporulation and elicitin production in three clonal lineages of Phytophthora ramorum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 74, 317–22.
22. Meentemeyer RK, Rank NE, Shoemaker DA et al., 2008. Impact of sudden oak death on tree mortality in the Big Sur ecoregion of California. Biological Invasions 10, 1243–55.
23. Moralejo E, Garcia Munoz JA, Descals E, 2006. Insights into Phytophthora ramorum sporulation: epidemiological and evolutionary implications. EPPO Bulletin 36, 383–9.
24. Peterson EK, 2013. The importance of understorey infection by Phytophthora ramorum as a means of primary disease establishment in Oregon forests. In: Frankel SJ, Kliejunas JT, Palmieri KM, Alexander JM, eds. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fifth Science Symposium. Albany, CA, USA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 91–2.
25. Rotherham ID, Bradley J, 2009. Lowland heaths: ecology, history, restoration and management. Journal of Practical Ecology and Conservation Special Series 5, 1–130.
26. Sansford CE, Inman AJ, Baker R et al., 2008. Report on the Risk of Entry, Establishment, Spread and Socio-Economic Loss and Environmental Impact and the Appropriate Level of Management for Phytophthora ramorum for the EU. EU Sixth Framework Project RAPRA. Deliverable Report 28.
27. Strong RA, Kolodny E, Kelsey RG, Gonzalez-Hernandez MP, Vivanco JM, Manter DK, 2013. Effect of plant sterols and tannins on Phytophthora ramorum growth and sporulation. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39, 733–43.
28. Tooley PW, Kyde KL, Englander L, 2004. Susceptibility of selected ericaceous ornamental host species to Phytophthora ramorum. Plant Disease 88, 993–9.
29. Tooley PW, Browning M, Leighity RM, 2013. Inoculum density relationships for infection of some eastern US forest species by Phytophthora ramorum. Journal of Phytopathology 161, 595–603.
30. Van der Plank JE, 1975. Principles of Plant Infection. New York, USA: Academic Press.
31. Webber JF, 2008. Status of Phytophthora ramorum and P. kernoviae in Europe. In: Frankel SJ, Kliejunas JT, Palmieri KM, eds. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Third Science Symposium. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-214. Albany, CA, USA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, US Forest Service, 19–26.
32. Webber JF, Mullett M, Brasier CM, 2010a. Dieback and mortality of plantation Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) associated with infection by Phytophthora ramorum. New Disease Reports 22, 19.
33. Webber JF, Turner J, Jennings P, 2010b. Report on Research Undertaken between October 2009 to March 2010, on Phytophthora ramorum Incited Dieback on Larch (Larix kaempferi). Farnham, UK: Forest Research UK.
34. Werres S, Riedel M, 2013. How does Phytophthora ramorum infect rhododendron leaves? In: Frankel SJ, Kliejunas JT, Palmieri KM, Alexander JM, eds. In: Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fifth Science Symposium. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-243. Albany, CA, USA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 60.