An overview of global research effort in fisheries science

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1004-1011

  Aksnes, Dag W ^a   Browman, Howard I ^b  

^a NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

^b INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

bibliometrics; cod; fish; rainbow trout; research impact; research trends; salmon; web of science

Indexed keywords

DEMERSAL FISH; FISHERY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; GADOID; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; LIFE SCIENCE; RESEARCH WORK; SALMONID; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CANADA; FRANCE; GERMANY; ITALY; NORWAY; UNITED KINGDOM;

GADUS MORHUA; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; SALMO SALAR;

EID: 84964755809     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv248     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aksnes, D.W., Olsen, T. B., and Seglen, P. O. (2000). Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of microbiology. A Norwegian case study. Scientometrics, 49: 7-22.
2. Aksnes, D.W., van Leeuwen, T. N., and Sivertsen, G. (2014). The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level. Scientometrics, 101: 1391-1401.
3. FAO. (2012). The State ofWorld Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAOFisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 223 pp.
4. Garibaldi, L. (2012). The FAO global capture production database: a sixdecade effort to catch the trend. Marine Policy, 36: 760-768.
5. Jaric, I., and Gessner, J. (2012). Analysis of publications on sturgeon research between 1996 and 2010. Scientometrics, 90: 715-735.
6. Jaric, I., Knežević-Jaric, J., and Gessner, J. (2015). Global effort allocation in marine mammal research indicates geographical, taxonomic and extinction risk-related biases. Mammal Review, 45: 54-62.
7. Jaric, I., Knežević-Jaric, J., and Lenhardt, M. (2012). Trends in fisheries science from 2000 to 2009: a bibliometric study. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 20: 70-79.
8. Leydesdorff, L. (1989). Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organizations. Research Policy, 18: 209-223.
9. Link, J. S. (2010). Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management: Confronting Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Lopez-Navarro, I., Moreno, A. I., Quintanilla, M.A ., and Rey-Rocha, J. 2015.Why do I publish research articles in English instead ofmyown language? Differences in Spanish researchers motivations across scientific domains. Scientometrics, 103: 939-976.
11. Lundberg, J. (2007). Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics, 1: 145-154.
12. Mather, M. E., Parrish, D.L., andDettmers, J.M.2008.Mappingthechanging landscape of fish-related journals: setting a course for successful communication of scientific information. Fisheries, 33: 444-453.
13. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht.
14. Natale, F., Fiore, G., and Hofherr, J. (2012). Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature. Scientometrics, 90: 983-999.
15. National Science Board. (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
16. Neff, M. W., and Corley, E. A. (2009). 35 years and 160, 000 articles: a bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics, 80: 657-682.
17. Nikolic, N., Bagliniere, J-L., Rigaud, C., Gardes, C., Masquilier, M. L., and Taverny, C. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of diadromous fish research from 1970s to 2010: a case study of seven species. Scientometrics, 88: 920-947.
18. OECD. (2014). Main Science andTechnology Indicators.Volume 2013/2. OECD Publishing, Paris.
19. Pauly, D., Belhabib, D., Blomeyer, R., Chueng, W. W. W. L., Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Copeland, D., Harper, S., et al. (2014). Chinas distant-water fisheries in the 21st century. Fish and Fisheries, 15: 474-488.
20. van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J.W., Visser, M. S., and van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the science citation index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51: 335-346.
21. van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, pp. 19-50. Ed. by H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, and U. Schmoch Kluwer, Dordrecht.
22. van Raan, A. F. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., and Visser, M. S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88: 495-498.
23. Wagner, C. S., andWong, S. K. (2012). Unseen science? Representation of BRICs in global science. Scientometrics, 90: 1001-1013.
24. Waltman, L., and van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96: 699-716.
25. Watson, R., and Pauly, D. (2001). Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends. Nature, 414: 534-536.