Metagenomic Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C): Techniques, applications, and challenges

F1000Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Darling, Aaron ^a   Liu, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84964685806     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7281.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Albertsen M Hugenholtz P Skarshewski A: Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(6):533-38. 23707974 10.1038/nbt.2579
2. Alneberg J Bjarnason BS de Bruijn I: Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11(11):1144-46. 25218180 10.1038/nmeth.3103
3. Beitel CW Froenicke L Lang JM: Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ. 2014;2:e415. 24918035 10.7717/peerj.415 4045339
4. Burton JN Adey A Patwardhan RP: Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1119-25. 24185095 10.1038/nbt.2727 4117202
5. Burton JN Liachko I Dunham MJ: Species-level deconvolution of metagenome assemblies with Hi-C-based contact probability maps. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4(7):1339-46. 24855317 10.1534/g3.114.011825 4455782
6. Dekker J Marti-Renom MA Mirny LA: Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(6):390-403. 23657480 10.1038/nrg3454 3874835
7. Dekker J Rippe K Dekker M: Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002;295(5558):1306-11. 11847345 10.1126/science.1067799
8. Handelsman J: Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(4):669-85. 15590779 10.1128/MMBR.68.4.669-685.2004 539003
9. Imelfort M Parks D Woodcroft BJ: GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e603. 25289188 10.7717/peerj.603 4183954
10. Larsen PA Heilman AM Yoder AD: The utility of PacBio circular consensus sequencing for characterizing complex gene families in non-model organisms. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):720. 25159659 10.1186/1471-2164-15-720 4152597
11. Laver T Harrison J O'Neill PA: Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION. Biomolecular Detection and Quantification. 2015;3:1-8. 10.1016/j.bdq.2015.02.001
12. Lieberman-Aiden E van Berkum NL Williams L: Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326(5950):289-93. 19815776 10.1126/science.1181369 2858594
13. Lindgreen S Adair KL Gardner P: An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools. bioRxiv. 2015. 10.1101/017830
14. Marbouty M Cournac A Flot JF: Metagenomic chromosome conformation capture (meta3C) unveils the diversity of chromosome organization in microorganisms. Elife. 2014;3:e03318. 25517076 10.7554/eLife.03318 4381813
15. Marie-Nelly H Marbouty M Cournac A: High-quality genome (re)assembly using chromosomal contact data. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5695. 25517223 10.1038/ncomms6695 4284522
16. Modi SR Lee HH Spina CS: Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature. 2013;499(7457):219-22. 23748443 10.1038/nature12212 3710538
17. Myers EW: The fragment assembly string graph. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(Suppl 2):ii79-85. 16204131 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1114
18. Nagano T Lubling Y Stevens TJ: Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature. 2013;502(7469):59-64. 24067610 10.1038/nature12593 3869051
19. Parks DH Imelfort M Skennerton CT: CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043-1055. 25977477 10.1101/gr.186072.114 4484387
20. Peabody MA Van Rossum T Lo R: Evaluation of shotgun metagenomics sequence classification methods using in silico and in vitro simulated communities. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:363. 26537885 10.1186/s12859-015-0788-5 4634789
21. Quick J Quinlan AR Loman NJ: A reference bacterial genome dataset generated on the MinION TM portable single-molecule nanopore sequencer. Gigascience. 2014;3:22. 25386338 10.1186/2047-217X-3-22 4226419
22. Selvaraj S R Dixon J Bansal V: Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1111-18. 24185094 10.1038/nbt.2728 4180835