A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images

Conservation Biology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 520-531

  Swanson, Alexandra ^a,b   Kosmala, Margaret ^a,c   Lintott, Chris ^b   Packer, Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Big data; Camera traps; Crowdsourcing; Data aggregation; Data validation; Image processing; Snapshot Serengeti; Zooniverse

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RESEARCH; TANZANIA; VOLUNTEER; WILD ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DATA COLLECTION; ECOLOGY; RESEARCH; TANZANIA; VOLUNTEERS;

EID: 84964474236     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12695     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beaumont CN, Goodman AA, Kendrew S, Williams JP, Simpson R. 2014. The Milky Way Project: leveraging citizen science and machine learning to detect interstellar bubbles. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 214:1.
2. Bischof R, Ali H, Kabir M, Hameed S, Nawaz MA. 2014. Being the underdog: an elusive small carnivore uses space with prey and time without enemies. Journal of Zoology 293. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12100.
3. Bonter DN, Cooper CB. 2012. Data validation in citizen science: a case study from Project FeederWatch. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:305-307.
4. Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B. 2007. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 10:117-128.
5. Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, Phillips T, Purcell K. 2012. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:291-297.
6. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:149-172.
7. Dillon A, Kelly MJ. 2007. Ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates. Oryx 41:469-477.
8. Dillon A, Kelly MJ. 2008. Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping. Journal of Zoology 275:391-398.
9. Foster-Smith J, Evans SM. 2003. The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 113:199-213.
10. Galloway AWE, Tudor MT, Haegan WMV. 2006. The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:1425-1429.
11. Gardiner MM, Allee LL, Brown PM, Losey JE, Roy HE, Smyth RR. 2012. Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:471-476.
12. Hennon CC, et al. 2014. Cyclone center: Can citizen scientists improve tropical cyclone intensity records? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00152.1.
13. Johnson LC, et al. 2015. PHAT stellar cluster survey. II. Andromeda Project cluster catalog. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.04966. Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.04966 (accessed February 2015).
14. Karanth KU. 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation 71:333-338.
15. Karanth K, Nichols JD. 2002. Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers, and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore.
16. Kelly MJ, Noss AJ, Di Bitetti MS, Maffei L, Arispe RL, Paviolo A, De Angelo CD, Di Blanco YE. 2008. Estimating puma densities from camera trapping across three study sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize. Journal of Mammalogy 89:408-418.
17. Kinnaird MF, O'Brien TG. 2012. Effects of Private-land use, livestock management, and human tolerance on diversity, distribution, and abundance of large African mammals: livestock and large mammals in Kenya. Conservation Biology 26:1026-1039.
18. Lintott CJ, et al. 2008. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 389:1179-1189.
19. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248-2255.
20. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE. 2006. Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. Marshall PJ, et al. 2015. SPACE WARPS - I. Crowdsourcing the discovery of gravitational lenses. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455:1171-1190.
22. Mugar G, Østerlund C, Hassman KD, Crowston K, Jackson CB. 2014. Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science. Pages 109-119 in Proceedings of the 17th ACB Conference on Computer Proxies in Online Citizen Science. Association for Computing Machinery.
23. O'Brien TG, Baillie JEM, Krueger L, Cuke M. 2010. The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels. Animal Conservation 13:335-343.
24. O'Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU. 2011. Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses. Springer, New York.
25. Pielou EC. 1966. Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology 10:370-383.
26. Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Murray P, Schawinski K, Szalay AS, Vandenberg J. 2010. Galaxy Zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review 9. DOI: 10.3847/AER2009036.
27. Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL, Lintott CJ, Cardamone C, Murray P, Schawinski K, Szalay AS, Vandenberg J. 2013. Galaxy Zoo: motivations of citizen scientists. arXiv:1303.6886 [astro-ph, physics:physics]. Available from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.6886.pdf (accessed October 2015).
28. Royle JA, Dorazio RM. 2008. Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology: the analysis of data from populations, metapopulations and communities. Academic, Burlington, MA.
29. Silvertown J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:467-471.
30. Silvertown J, Harvey M, Greenwood R, Dodd M, Rosewell J, Rebelo T, Ansine J, McConway K. 2015. Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: a case-study of iSpot. ZooKeys 480:125-146.
31. Simpson E, Roberts S, Psorakis I, Smith A. 2012. Dynamic Bayesian combination of multiple imperfect classifiers. ArXiv e-prints 1206:arXiv:1206.1831.
32. Swanson A, Kosmala M, Lintott C, Simpson R, Smith A, Packer C. 2015. Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Scientific Data 2:150026.
33. Tulloch AIT, Possingham HP, Joseph LN, Szabo J, Martin TG. 2013. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165:128-138.
34. Wiggins A, Lagoze C, Wong W-K, Kelling S. 2014. A sensor network approach to managing data quality in citizen science. Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing. Available from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/HCOMP/HCOMP14/paper/view/9263 (accessed March 7, 2016).
35. Willett KW, et al. 2013. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304, 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. arXiv:1308.3496 [astro-ph]. Available from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.3496v2.pdf (accessed October 2015).