Collaborative analysis of multi-gigapixel imaging data using Cytomine

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1395-1401

  Marée, Raphaël ^a,b   Rollus, Loïc ^a   Stévens, Benjamin ^a   Hoyoux, Renaud ^a   Louppe, Gilles ^a   Vandaele, Rémy ^a   Begon, Jean Michel ^a   Kainz, Philipp ^c   Geurts, Pierre ^a   Wehenkel, Louis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; INTERNET; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS;

IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTERNET; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84964370778     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aceto, J. et al. (2015) Zebrafish bone and general physiology are differently affected by hormones or changes in gravity. PLoS ONE, 10, e0126928.
2. Allan, C. et al. (2012) OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat. Methods, 9, 245.
3. Anonymous (2011) Ground-Truth data cannot do it alone. Nat. Methods, 8, 885
4. Anonymous (2012) The data deluge. Nat. Cell Biol., 14, 775
5. Anonymous (2014) Software with impact. Nat. Methods, 11, 213
6. Boukerroucha, M. et al. (2015) Evaluation of BRCA1-related molecular features and microRNAs as prognostic factors for triple negative breast cancers. BMC Cancer, 15, 755.
7. Carpenter, A. et al. (2012) A call for bioimaging software usability. Nat. Methods, 8, 666-670.
8. Carpenter, A. et al. (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol., 7, R100.
9. Clery, D. (2011) Galaxy zoo volunteers share pain and glory of research. Science, 333, 173-175.
10. de Chaumont, F. et al. (2012) Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research. Nat. Methods, 9, 690-696.
11. Delga, A. et al. (2014) Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep(R) automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte(R) cell sorter imaging system. Acta Cytol., 58, 469-477.
12. de Souza, N. (2013) Machines learn phenotypes. Nat. Methods, 9, 38
13. Huang, C.T. et al. (2015) Evaluation and comparison of anatomical landmark detection methods for cephalometric X-ray images: a grand challenge. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 34, 1890-1900.
14. Jeanray, N. et al. (2015) Phenotype classification of zebrafish embryos by supervised learning. PLoS ONE, 10, e0116989.
15. Jug, F. et al. (2014) Bioimage informatics in the context of Drosophila research. Methods, 68, 60-73.
16. Kvilekval, K. et al. (2010) Bisque: a platform for bioimage analysis and management. Bioinformatics, 26, 544-552.
17. Leroi, N. et al. (2015) The timing of surgery after neoadjuvant radiotherapy influences tumor dissemination in a preclinical model. Oncotarget, 6, 36825-36837.
18. Lobet, G. et al. (2013) An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods, 9, 38.
19. Longuespee, R. et al. (2015) A laser microdissection-based workflow for FFPE tissue microproteomics: important considerations for small sample processing. Methods, doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.12.008.
20. Maree, R. et al. (2013a) Extremely randomized trees and random subwindows for image classification, annotation, and retrieval. Invited chapter in Decision Forests in Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 125-142.
21. Maree, R. et al. (2013b) A rich internet application for remote visualization and collaborative annotation of digital slides in histology and cytology. Diagnos. Pathol., 8(S1), S26.
22. Maree, R. et al. (2014) A hybrid human-computer approach for large-scale image-based measurements using web services and machine learning. In: Proc. 11th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 902-906.
23. Maree, R. et al. (2016) An approach for detection of glomeruli in multisite digital pathology. In: Proc. 13th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).
24. Mikut, R. et al. (2013) Automated processing of zebrafish imaging data: a survey. Zebrafish, 10, 401-421.
25. Moody, A. et al. (2013) The big picture. Nature, 502, S95.
26. Murphy, R.F. (2011) An active role for machine learning in drug development. Nat. Chem Biol., 7, 327-330.
27. Myers, G. (2012) Why bioimage informatics matters. Nat. Methods, 9, 659-660.
28. Pietzsch, T. et al. (2015) BigDataViewer: visualization and processing for large image data sets. Nat. Methods, 12, 481-483.
29. Poldrack, R. (2014) Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging. Nat. Neurosci., 17, 1510-1517.
30. Prins, P. et al. (2015) Towards effective software solutions for big biology. Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 686-687.
31. Saalfeld, S. et al. (2009) CATMAID: collaborative annotation toolkit for massive amounts of image data. Bioinformatics, 25, 1984-1986.
32. Schindelin, J. et al. (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods, 9, 676-682.
33. Schneider-Mizell, C.M. et al. (2015) Quantitative neuroanatomy for connectomics in Drosophila. bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/026617.
34. Sommer, C. et al. (2011) Ilastik: Interactive Learning and Segmentation Toolkit. In: Proc. 8th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 230-233.
35. Suarez-Carmona, M. et al. (2015) Soluble factors regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal transition mediate tumour angiogenesis and myeloid cell recruitment. J. Pathol., 236, 491-504.
36. Weekers, L. et al. (2015) Activation of the calcium-sensing receptor before renal ischemia/ reperfusion exacerbates kidney injury.Am. J. Transl.Res., 7, 128-138.