Bridge over troubled waters: A synthesis session to connect scientific and decision making sectors

Marine Policy

Volumn 70, Issue , 2016, Pages 30-39

  Goldsmith, Kaitlin ^a   Granek, Elise ^a   Lubitow, Amy ^a   Papenfus, Michael ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coastal management; Evidence based decisions; Research based policy; Stakeholder engagement; Synthesis session; Workshop

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84964345828     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cairns C., Harris M. Local cross-sector partnerships: tackling the challenges collaboratively. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 2011, 21(3):311-324. 10.1002/nml.
2. Cook C.N., Mascia M.B., Schwartz M.W., Possingham H.P., Fuller R.A. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27(4):669-678.
3. Cvitanovic C., Hobday A.J., van Kerkhoff L., Wilson S.K., Dobbs K., Marshall N.A. Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: a review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015, 112(2015):25-35.
4. Davis E., Moseley C., Olsen C., Abrams J., Creighton J. Diversity and dynamism of fire science and user needs. J. For. 2013, 111(2):101-107.
5. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research 2011, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. 4th ed. N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.).
6. Dobbins M., Rosenbaum P., Plews N., Law M., Fysh A. Information transfer: what do decision makers want and need from researchers?. Implement. Sci. 2007, 2(20):1-12.
7. Fazey J., Ingram J., Gregson J., Lowe P., Morton S., Trevitt C. Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environ. Conserv. 2012, 40(1):19-36.
8. Goldsmith K., Granek E., Lubitow A. Information needs assessment for coastal and marine management and policy: ecosystem services under changing climatic, land use, and demographic conditions. Environ. Manag. 2015, 10.1007/s00267-015-0576-z.
9. Granek E., Polasky S., Kappel C.V., Reed D.J., Stoms D.M., Koch E.W., Kennedy C.J., Cramer L.A., Hacker S.D., Barbier E.B., Aswani S., Ruckelshaus M., Perillo G.M.E., Silliman B.R., Muthiga N., Bael D., Wolanski E. Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 24(1):207-216. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01355.x.
10. Grorud-Colvert K., Lester S.E., Airamé S., Neeley E., Gaines S.D., Levin S.A. Communicating marine reserve science to diverse audiences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107(43):18306-18311.
11. Jacobson S.K. Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals 2009, Island Press, Washington D.C. 2nd ed.
12. Jandl R., Borsdorf A., Siegel G. COST strategy workshop. Mt. Res. Dev. 2008, 28(2):172-173. 10.1659/mrd.1017.
13. Karrer L., Beldia P., Dennison B., Dominici A., Dutra G., English C., Gunawan T., Hastings J., Katz L., Kelty R., McField M., Nunez E., Obura D., Ortiz F., Quesada M., Sivo L., Stone G. Science-to-Action Guidebook 2011, Science and Knowledge Division, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
14. D. Lach, A. Parker, M. Boesl, Assessing Regional Climate Needs, 2012, Pacific Northwest Climate Decision Support Consortium Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
15. Lavis J.N., Robertson D., Woodside J.M., McLeod C.B., Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?. Milbank Q. 2003, 81(2):221-248.
16. Murcia C., Kattan G. Application of science to protected area management: overcoming the barriers. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2009, 96(3):508-520. 10.3417/2008031.
17. National Research Council, Using science as evidence in public policy. Committee on the Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy, in: K. Prewitt, T.A. Schwandt, M.L. Straf (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, 2012, The National Academies Press Washington, D.C.
18. Oreszczyn S., Carr S. Improving the link between policy research and practice: using a scenario workshop as a qualitative research tool in the case of genetically modified crops. Qual. Res. 2008, 8(4):473-497.
19. Pituch K.A., Lawson K.A., Wilcox R.E., Littlefield J.H., Miller J.D., Erickson C.K. A multisite evaluation of a communication skills workshop for scientists. J. Teach. Addict. 2006, 4(2):1-22. 10.1300/J188v04n02_01.
20. Renner R., Schneider F., Hohenwallner D., Kopeinig C., Kruse S., Lienert J., Link S., Muhar S. Meeting the challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable water governance. Mt. Res. Dev. 2013, 33(3):234-247.
21. J. Risien (Ed.), West Coast Regional Marine Research and Information Needs, 2009, Oregon Sea Grant ORESU-Q-09-001, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
22. Rowe A., Lee K. Linking Knowledge with Action: an Approach to Philanthropic Funding of Science for Conservation. A Report to the Conservation & Science Program 2012, David & Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Altos, California, USA.
23. Stone D. Using knowledge: the dilemmas of 'Bridging Research and Policy'. Comp.: J. Comp. Educ. 2002, 32(3):285-296. 10.1080/0305792022000007454.
24. Wainger L.A., King D.M., Mack R.N., Price E.W., Maslin T. Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(5):978-987. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.011.