Retraction Note: Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games (Nature, (2016), 532, 7598, (210-213), 10.1038/nature17620);Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games

Nature

Volumn 532, Issue 7598, 2016, Pages 210-213

  Sørensen, Jens Jakob W H ^a   Pedersen, Mads Kock ^a   Munch, Michael ^a   Haikka, Pinja ^a   Jensen, Jesper Halkjær ^a   Planke, Tilo ^a   Andreasen, Morten Ginnerup ^a   Gajdacz, Miroslav ^a   Mølmer, Klaus ^a   Lieberoth, Andreas ^a   Sherson, Jacob F ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEURISTICS; LANDSCAPE; NUMERICAL METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; PHYSICS; PROTEIN; QUANTUM MECHANICS; RESEARCH WORK; RNA; SOFTWARE;

ARTICLE; LANDSCAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VIDEO GAME; ALGORITHM; CROWDSOURCING; GAME; HUMAN; INTUITION; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGY; QUANTUM THEORY;

ALGORITHMS; CROWDSOURCING; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; INTUITION; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUANTUM THEORY; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84964319443     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2515-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. McLeod, P., Dienes, Z. Do fielders know where to go to catch the ball or only how to get there? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 531-543 (1996).
2. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. in Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (eds Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., The ABC Research Group) 3-34 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).
3. Cooper, S. et al. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 756-760 (2010).
4. Lee, J. et al. RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2122-2127 (2014).
5. Kim, J. S. et al. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 509, 331-336 (2014).
6. Weitenberg, C., Kuhr, S., Mølmer, K., Sherson, J. Quantum computation architecture using optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. A 84, 032322 (2011).
7. Mandelstam, L., Tamm, I. The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. 9, 249-254 (1945).
8. Caneva, T., Calarco, T., Fazio, R., Santoro, G. E., Montangero, S. Speeding up critical system dynamics through optimized evolution. Phys. Rev. A 84, 012312 (2011).
9. Gajdacz, M., Das, K. K., Arlt, J., Sherson, J. F., Opatrný, T. Time limited optimal dynamics beyond the quantum speed limit. Phys. Rev. A 92, 062106 (2015).
10. Monroe, C. Quantum information processing with atoms and photons. Nature 416, 238-246 (2002).
11. Lewenstein, M. et al. Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond. Adv. Phys. 56, 243-379 (2007).
12. Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K. Quantum error correction for beginners. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 076001 (2013).
13. Rabitz, H., Hsieh, M. M., Rosenthal, C. M. Quantum optimally controlled transition landscapes. Science 303, 1998-2001 (2004).
14. Sklarz, S., Tannor, D. Loading a Bose-Einstein condensate onto an optical lattice: an application of optimal control theory to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053619 (2002).
15. Ugray, Z. et al. Scatter search and local NLP solvers: a multistart framework for global optimization. Inf. J. Comp. 19, 328-340 (2007).
16. Caneva, T. et al. Optimal control at the quantum speed limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 240501 (2009).
17. Bilali, M., Langner, R., Erb, M., Grodd, W. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139, 728-742 (2010).
18. Lintott, C. et al. Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900,000 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 166-178 (2011).
19. Bakr, W. S. et al. Probing the superfluid-to-Mott insulator transition at the single-atom level. Science 329, 547-550 (2010).
20. Sherson, J. F. et al. Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467, 68-72 (2010).
21. Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45-53 (2010).
22. Weitenberg, C. et al. Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 471, 319-324 (2011).
23. Kaufman, A. et al. Entangling two transportable neutral atoms via local spin exchange. Nature 527, 208-211 (2015).
24. De Chiara, G. et al. Optimal control of atom transport for quantum gates in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052333 (2008).
25. Jäger, G., Reich, D. M., Goerz, M. H., Koch, C. P., Hohenester, U. Optimal quantum control of Bose-Einstein condensates in magnetic microtraps: comparison of gradient-ascent-pulse-engineering and Krotov optimization schemes. Phys. Rev. A 90, 033628 (2014).
26. Doria, P., Calarco, T., Montangero, S. Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190501 (2011).
27. Caneva, T., Calarco, T., Montangero, S. Chopped random-basis quantum optimization. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).
28. Zahedinejad, E., Schirmer, S., Sanders, B. C. Evolutionary algorithms for hard quantum control. Phys. Rev. A 90, 032310 (2014).
29. Roslund, J., Rabitz, H. Experimental quantum control landscapes: inherent monotonicity and artificial structure. Phys. Rev. A 80, 013408 (2009).
30. Vuculescu, O., Bergenholtz, C. How to solve problems with crowds: a computer-based simulation model. Creativity Innov. Manage. 23, 121-136 (2014).
31. Lieberoth, A. et al. Getting humans to do quantum optimization-user acquisition, engagement and early results from the citizen cyberscience game Quantum Moves. Human Comput. 1, 221-246 (2014).
32. Sauermann, H., Franzoni, C. Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 679-684 (2015).
33. Calarco, T., Dorner, U., Julienne, P., Williams, C., Zoller, P. Quantum computations with atoms in optical lattices: marker qubits and molecular interactions. Phys. Rev. A 70, 012306 (2004).
34. 34.,erlini, M. et al. Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448, 452-456 (2007).
35. Jørgensen, N. B., Bason, M. G., Sherson, J. F. One-and two-qubit quantum gates using superimposed optical-lattice potentials. Phys. Rev. A 89, 032306 (2014).