Combined effects of cognitive bias for food cues and poor inhibitory control on unhealthy food intake

Appetite

Volumn 87, Issue , 2015, Pages 358-364

  Kakoschke, Naomi ^a   Kemps, Eva ^a   Tiggemann, Marika ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Approach; Attention; Cognitive bias; Consumption; Food cues; Inhibitory control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COGNITIVE BIAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EATING; FAST FOOD; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD CONTROL; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; HUNGER; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCESS MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASTE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CUES; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SNACKS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964199204     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Appelhans B.M., Woolf K., Pagoto S.L., Schneider K.L., Whited M.C., Liebman R. Inhibiting food reward. Delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity 2011, 19:2175-2182.
2. Attwood A.S., O'Sullivan H., Leonards U., Mackintosh B., Munafo M. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2008, 103:1875-1882.
3. Berridge K.C. 'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards. Brain substrates and roles in eating disorders. Physiology & Behavior 2009, 97:537-550.
4. Bezdjian S., Baker L.A., Lozano D.I., Raine A. Assessing inattention and impulsivity in children during the Go/NoGo task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2009, 27:365-383.
5. Brignell C., Griffiths T., Bradley B.P., Mogg K. Attentional and approach biases for pictorial food cues. Influence of external eating. Appetite 2009, 52:299-306.
6. Burton P., Smit H.J., Lightowler H.J. The influence of restrained and external eating patterns on overeating. Appetite 2007, 49:191-197.
7. Carnell S., Gibson C., Benson L., Ochner C.N., Geliebter A. Neuroimaging and obesity. Current knowledge and future directions. Obesity Reviews 2012, 13:43-56.
8. Castellanos E.H., Charboneau E., Dietrich M.S., Park S., Bradley B.P., Mogg K., et al. Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images. Evidence for altered reward system function. International Journal of Obesity 2009, 33:1063-1073.
9. Conway A.R., Kane M.J., Engle R.W. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:547-552.
10. Coskunpinar A., Cyders M.A. Impulsivity and substance-related attentional bias. A meta-analytic review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2013, 133:1-14.
11. Cousijn J., Goudriaan A.E., Wiers R.W. Reaching out towards cannabis. Approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2011, 106:1667-1674.
12. Eberl C., Wiers R.W., Pawelczack S., Rinck M., Becker E.S., Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 4:38-51.
13. Fadardi J.S., Cox W.M. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2009, 101(3):137-145.
14. Field M., Cox W.M. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors. A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 97:1-20.
15. Field M., Duka T., Eastwood B., Child R., Santarcangelo M., Gayton M. Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers. Do the effects generalise?. Psychopharmacology 2007, 195:593-608.
16. Field M., Duka T., Tyler E., Schoenmakers T. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2009, 11:812-822.
17. Field M., Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 2005, 183:350-357.
18. Grand S. Color-word interference: an investigation of the role of vocal conflict and hunger in associative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 77(1):31-40.
19. Guerrieri R., Nederkoorn C., Jansen A. How impulsiveness and variety influence food intake in a sample of healthy women. Appetite 2007, 48:119-122.
20. Guerrieri R., Nederkoorn C., Stankiewicz K., Alberts H., Geschwind N., Martijn C., et al. The influence of trait and induced state impulsivity on food intake in normal-weight healthy women. Appetite 2007, 49:66-73.
21. Hardman C.A., Rogers P.J., Etchells K.A., Houstoun K.V., Munafò M.R. The effects of food-related attentional bias training on appetite and food intake. Appetite 2013, 71:295-300.
22. Havermans R.C., Giesen J.C., Houben K., Jansen A. Weight, gender, and snack appeal. Eating Behaviors 2011, 12:126-130.
23. Hofmann W., Friese M., Roefs A. Three ways to resist temptation. The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:431-435.
24. Hollitt S., Kemps E., Tiggemann M., Smeets E., Mills J.S. Components of attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters. Appetite 2010, 54:309-313.
25. Hou R., Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Moss-Morris R., Peveler R., Roefs A. External eating, impulsivity and attentional bias to food cues. Appetite 2011, 56:424-427.
26. Houben K. Overcoming the urge to splurge: Influencing eating behavior by manipulating inhibitory control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2011, 42(3):384-388.
27. Houben K., Jansen A. Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite 2011, 56:345-349.
28. Houben K., Nederkoorn C., Jansen A. Too tempting to resist? Past success at weight control rather than dietary restraint determines exposure-induced disinhibited eating. Appetite 2012, 59(2):550-555.
29. Houben K., Nederkoorn C., Wiers R.W., Jansen A. Resisting temptation. Decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2011, 116:132-136.
30. Houben K., Wiers R.W. Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 2009, 33:626-633.
31. Houben K., Wiers R.W., Jansen A. Getting a grip on drinking behavior training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychological Science 2011, 22:968-975.
32. Kakoschke N., Kemps E., Tiggemann M. Attentional bias modification encourages healthy eating. Eating Behaviors 2014, 15:120-124.
33. Kemps E., Tiggemann M., Hollitt S. Biased attentional processing of food cues and modification in obese individuals. Health Psychology 2014, 33:1391-1401.
34. Kemps E., Tiggemann M., Martin R., Elliott M. Implicit approach-avoidance associations for craved food cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied 2013, 19:30-38.
35. Kemps E., Tiggemann M., Orr J., Grear J. Attentional re-training can reduce chocolate consumption. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied 2014, 20:94-102.
36. Loeber S., Grosshans M., Korucuoglu O., Vollmert C., Vollstädt-Klein S., Schneider S., et al. Impairment of inhibitory control in response to food-associated cues and attentional bias of obese participants and normal-weight controls. International Journal of Obesity 2011, 36:1334-1339.
37. MacLeod C., Mathews A., Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1986, 95(1):15.
38. MacLeod C., Matthews A. Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review Clinical Psychology 2012, 8:189-217.
39. Meule A., Kübler A. Double trouble. Trait food craving and impulsivity interactively predict food-cue affected behavioral inhibition. Appetite 2014, 79:174-182.
40. Meule A., Lutz A.P., Krawietz V., Stützer J., Vögele C., Kübler A. Food-cue affected motor response inhibition and self-reported dieting success. A pictorial affective shifting task. Frontiers in Psychology 2014, 5:1-17.
41. Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Hyare H., Lee S. Selective attention to food-related stimuli in hunger. Are attentional biases specific to emotional and pathological states, or are they found in normal drive states?. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1998, 36:227-237.
42. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australian Dietary Guidelines http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/n55.
43. Nederkoorn C., Braet C., Van Eijs Y., Tanghe A., Jansen A. Why obese children cannot resist food. The role of impulsivity. Eating Behaviors 2006, 7:315-322.
44. Nederkoorn C., Guerrieri R., Havermans R.C., Roefs A., Jansen A. The interactive effect of hunger and impulsivity on food intake and purchase in a virtual supermarket. International Journal of Obesity 2009, 33:905-912.
45. Nederkoorn C., Houben K., Hofmann W., Roefs A., Jansen A. Control yourself or just eat what you like? Weight gain over a year is predicted by an interactive effect of response inhibition and implicit preference for snack foods. Health Psychology 2010, 29:389-393.
46. Nederkoorn C., Smulders F.T., Havermans R.C., Roefs A., Jansen A. Impulsivity in obese women. Appetite 2006, 47:253-256.
47. Nijs I.M., Franken I.H., Muris P. Enhanced processing of food-related pictures in female external eaters. Appetite 2009, 53:376-383.
48. Nijs I.M., Franken I.H., Muris P. Food-related Stroop interference in obese and normal-weight individuals. Behavioral and electrophysiological indices. Eating Behaviors 2010, 11:258-265.
49. Nijs I.M., Muris P., Euser A.S., Franken I.H. Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety. Appetite 2010, 54:243-254.
50. Peeters M., Wiers R.W., Monshouwer K., Schoot R., Janssen T., Vollebergh W.A. Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2012, 107(11):1939-1946.
51. Price R.B., Kuckertz J.M., Siegle G.J., Ladouceur C.D., Silk J.S., Ryan N.D., et al. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. Psychological Assessment 2014, 10.1037/pas0000036.
52. Rinck M., Becker E.S. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2007, 38:105-120.
53. Roefs A., Werrij M.Q., Smulders F.T., Jansen A. The value of indirect measures for assessing food preferences in abnormal eating. Journal for Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2006, 1:180-186.
54. Schmukle S.C. Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality 2005, 19(7):595-605.
55. Seibt B., Häfner M., Deutsch R. Prepared to eat. How immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:359-379.
56. Sharbanee J.M., Stritzke W.G., Wiers R.W., MacLeod C. Alcohol-related biases in selective attention and action tendency make distinct contributions to dysregulated drinking behaviour. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2013, 108:1758-1766.
57. Strack F., Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:220-247.
58. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2007, Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA. 5th ed.
59. Veenstra E.M., de Jong P.J. Restrained eaters show enhanced automatic approach tendencies towards food. Appetite 2010, 55:30-36.
60. Werthmann J., Field M., Roefs A., Nederkoorn C., Jansen A. Attention bias for chocolate increases chocolate consumption. An attention bias modification study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2014, 45:136-143.
61. Werthmann J., Roefs A., Nederkoorn C., Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Jansen A. Can (not) take my eyes off it. Attention bias for food in overweight participants. Health Psychology 2011, 30:561.
62. Wiers C.E., Kühn S., Javadi A.H., Korucuoglu O., Wiers R.W., Walter H., et al. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 2013, 229:187-197.
63. Wiers R.W., Eberl C., Rinck M., Becker E.S., Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science 2011, 22:490-497.
64. Wiers R.W., Gladwin T.E., Hofmann W., Salemink E., Ridderinkhof K.R. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science 2013, 1:192-212.
65. Wiers R.W., Rinck M., Dictus M., Van Den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes, Brain, and Behavior 2009, 8:101-106.
66. Wiers R.W., Rinck M., Kordts R., Houben K., Strack F. Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2010, 105:279-287.
67. World Health Organization (WHO) World Health Statistics 2013 http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2013/en/.