Incorporation of velocity pulses in design ground motions for response history analysis using a probabilistic framework

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1647-1666

  Almufti, Ibrahim ^a   Motamed, Ramin ^b   Grant, Damian N ^a   Willford, Michael ^a  

^a ARUP   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS;

DESIGN GROUND MOTION; ENGINEERING JUDGMENTS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; PEER-REVIEW PROCESS; PROBABILISTIC FRAMEWORK; PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84964042180     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: 19448201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/032113EQS072M     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., 2000. Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Sixth International Conf. Seismic Zonation, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
2. Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H., 2001. Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures, Technical Report Blume Center Report 138, Stanford, CA.
3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.
4. Baker, J. W., 2011. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection, Journal of Structural Engineering 137, 322-331.
5. Baker, J. W., and Jayaram, N., 2008. Correlation of spectral acceleration values from NGA ground motion models, Earthquake Spectra 24, 299-317.
6. Baker, J. W., 2007. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 97, 1486-1501.
7. Bray, J. D., and Rodriguez-Marek, A., 2004. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24, 815-828.
8. California Building Code (CBC), 2010. California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, California Building Standards Commission, Sacramento, CA.
9. Champion, C., and Liel, A., 2012. The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41, 1391-1409.
10. Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W., 2008. NGA Project strong motion database, Earthquake Spectra 24, 23-44.
11. EZ-FRISK, 2011. EZ-FRISK, Software for Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation, Version 7.62, Risk Engineering.
12. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-750 Report, Washington, D.C.
13. Grant, D. N., 2011. Response spectral matching of two horizontal ground-motion components, Journal of Structural Engineering 137, 289-297.
14. Grant, D. N., 2012. Preservation of velocity pulses in response spectral matching, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
15. Grant, D. N., and Diaferia, R., 2013. Assessing adequacy of spectrally matched ground motions for response history analysis, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42, 1265-1280.
16. Hancock, J., Bommer, J. J., and Stafford, P. J., 2008. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37, 1585-1607.
17. Huang, Y.-N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N., 2008. Maximum spectral demands in the near-fault region, Earthquake Spectra 24, 319-341.
18. Lin, T., Harmsen, S. C., Baker, J. W., and Luco, N., 2013. Conditional spectrum computation incorporating multiple causal earthquakes and ground motion prediction models, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103, 1103-1116.
19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2012. Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions For Performing Response-History Analyses, NIST GCR 11-917-15, prepared by the NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture for the Gaithersburg, MD.
20. Oasys, 2012. Oasys Sismic: Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Program, Version 9.2.0.10b, by Arup.
21. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2010. Technical Report for the PEER Ground Motion Database Web Application, Beta-Version, University of California, Berkeley.
22. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2013. PEER NGA-West2 Database, University of California, Berkeley.
23. Rodriguez-Marek, A., and Bray, J. D., 2006. Site response for near-fault forward directivity ground motions, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 132, 1611-1620.
24. Shahi, S. K., 2013. A Probabilistic Framework to Include the Effects of Near-Fault Directivity in Seismic Hazard Assessment, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, available at http://purl .stanford.edu/hb804nv7861.
25. Shahi, S. K., and Baker, J. W., 2013. NGA-West2 Models for Ground-Motion Directionality, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA
26. Shahi, S. K., and Baker, J. W., 2011. An empirically calibrated framework for including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101, 742-755.
27. Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W., and Abrahamson, N. A., 1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismological Research Letters 68, 199-222.
28. Stewart, J. P., Abrahamson, N. A., Atkinson, G. M., Baker, J., Boore, D. M., Bozorgnia, Y., Campbell, K. W., Comartin, C. D., Idriss, I. M., Lew, M., Mehrain, M., Moehle, J. P., Naeim, F., and Sabol, T. A., 2011. Representation of bi-directional ground motions for design spectra in building codes, Earthquake Spectra 27, 927-937.
29. Tothong, P., and Cornell, C. A., 2008. Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 37, 1013-1037.
30. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2003. Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region 2002-2031, USGS Open File Report 03-214, available at http:// pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-214/.