Representation of bidirectional ground motions for design spectra in building codes

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 927-937

  Stewart, Jonathan P ^a   Abrahamson, Norman A ^b   Atkinson, Gail M ^c   Baker, Jack W ^d   Boore, David M ^e   Bozorgnia, Yousef ^f   Campbell, Kenneth W ^g   Comartin, Craig D ^h   Idriss, I M ^h   Lew, Marshall ^h   Mehrain, Michael ⁱ   Moehle, Jack P ^j   Naeim, Farzad ^h   Sabol, Thomas A ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g EQECAT   (United States)

^h Comartin Inc ^*

ⁱ URS CORPORATION   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^k Englekirk and Sabol Inc   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; STIFFNESS;

BI-DIRECTIONAL GROUND MOTIONS; DESIGN GROUND MOTION; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION; PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 80052159065     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3608001     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., Atkinson, G. M., Boore, D. M., Bozorgnia, Y., Campbell, K. W., Chiou, B. S. J., Idriss, I. M., Silva, W. J., and Youngs, R. R., 2008. Comparisons of the NGA ground motion relations, Earthquake Spectra 24, 45-66.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE-7.10, in press.
3. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A., 2006. Which spectral acceleration are you using? Earthquake Spectra 22, 293-312.
4. Beyer, K., and Bommer, J. J., 2006. Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion, Bull Seism Soc Am. 96, 1512-1522. (Pubitemid 44295446)
5. Boore, D. M., 2010. Orientation-independent, non geometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion, Bull Seism Soc Am. 100, 1830-1835.
6. Boore, D. M., Watson-Lamprey, J., and Abrahamson, N. A., 2006. Orientation-independent measures of ground motion, Bull Seism Soc Am. 96, 1502-1511. (Pubitemid 44295445)
7. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2003. Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA-450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
8. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2009. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-749, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
9. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2007. Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, PEER Report No. 2007=02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 238 pp.
10. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2008. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s, Earthquake Spectra 24, 139-171.
11. Christovasilis, I. P., Filiatrault, A., Constantinou, M. C., and Wanitkorkul, A., 2009. Incremental dynamic analysis of woodframe buildings, Eq Engrg & Str Dyn 38, 477-496.
12. nd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
13. Douglas, J., 2003. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectra ordinates, Earth Science Reviews 61, 43-104. (Pubitemid 36270342)
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2009. Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters, FEMA P695A, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
15. Goulet, C. A., and Stewart, J. P., 2009. Pitfalls of deterministic application of nonlinear site factors in probabilistic assessment of ground motions, Earthquake Spectra 25, 541-555.
16. Huang, Y. N., Whittaker, A. S., and Luco, N., 2008. Maximum spectral demands in the nearfault region, Earthquake Spectra 24, 319-341.
17. Luco, N., Ellingwood, B. R., Hamburger, R. O., Hooper, J. D., Kimball, J. K., and Kircher, C. A., 2007. Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States, Proc. 2007 Structural Engineers Assoc. Calif. (SEAOC) Convention, Lake Tahoe, CA, 163-175.
18. Petersen, M. D., Frankel, A. D., Harmsen, S. C., Mueller, C. S., Haller, K. M., Wheeler, R. L., Wesson, R. L., Zeng, Y., Boyd, O. S., Perkins, D. M., Luco, N., Field, E. H., Willis, C. J., and Rukstales, K. S., 2008. Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, USGS Open-File Report 2008-1128, 60 pp. plus appendices.
19. Power, M. S., Chiou, B. S. J., Abrahamson, N. A., Bozorgnia, Y., Shantz, T., and Roblee, C. J., 2008. An overview of the NGA project, Earthquake Spectra 24, 3-21.
20. MaxRot, Bull Seism Soc Am 97, 1511-1524.