Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2031-2057

  Hillis, Stephen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bi chi squared; Binormal likelihood ratio; Diagnostic radiology; PROPROC; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

FAMILY; MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL MODEL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84964000360     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6816     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Investigative Radiology. 1986; 21: 720-733.
2. Pepe M. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford: New York, 2003.
3. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley: Hoboken, 2011.
4. Hanley JA. The robustness of the binormal assumptions used in fitting ROC curves. Medical Decision Making. 1988; 8: 197-203.
5. Hanley JA. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine. 1996; 15: 1575-1585.
6. Hajian-Tilaki KO, Hanley JA, Joseph L, Collet JP. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests. Medical Decision Making. 1997; 17: 94-102.
7. Swets JA. Form of empirical ROCS in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychological Bulletin. 1986; 99: 181-198.
8. Egan JP. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. Academic Press: New York, 1975.
9. Van Dyke CW, White RD, Obuchowski NA, Geisinger MA, Lorig RJ, Meziane MA. Cine MRI in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection. In 79th RSNA Meetings: Chicago, IL, November 28-December 3, 1993.
10. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Investigative Radiology. 1989; 24: 234-245.
11. Pan XC, Metz CE. The proper binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data. Academic Radiology. 1997; 4: 380-389.
12. Metz CE, Pan XC. Proper binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1999; 43: 1-33.
13. Hillis SL, Berbaum KS. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves. Academic Radiology. 2011; 18: 143-154.
14. Bamber D. Area above ordinal dominance graph and area below receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1975; 12: 387-415.
15. Thompson ML, Zucchini W. On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Statistics in Medicine. 1989; 8: 1277-1290.
16. McClish DK. Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve. Medical Decision Making. 1989; 9: 190-195.
17. Jiang YL, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology. 1996; 201: 745-750.
18. Pesce LL, Metz CE. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. Academic Radiology. 2007; 14: 814-829.
19. Schartz KM, Hillis SL, Pesce LL, Berbaum KS. OR-DBM MRMC (Version 2.5) [Computer software]. (Available from: http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) [Accessed on 22 July 2015].
20. Hillis SL, Schartz KM, Berbaum KS. OR/DBM MRMC for SAS (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. (Available from: http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu) [Accessed on 22 July 2015].
21. Gönen M. Analyzing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves with SAS. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, North Carolina, 2007.
22. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Statistics in Medicine. 1998; 17(9): 1033-1053.
23. Leone FC, Nelson LS, Nottingham RB. The folded normal distribution. Technometrics. 1961; 3: 543-550.
24. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE, Lenth RV, Hanley JA, AbuDagga H. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model. Academic Radiology. 1997; 4: 138-149.
25. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data - Part II. A formal model. Academic Radiology. 2000; 7: 427-437.
26. Mossman D, Peng H. Constructing proper ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions. Medical Decision Making. 2014; 34(4): 523-535.
27. Samuelson FW. Two-sample models with monotonic likelihood ratios for ordinal regression. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 2011; 55: 223-228.
28. Dodd LE, Pepe MS. Partial AUC estimation and regression. Biometrics. 2003; 59: 614-623.