A contaminated binormal model for ROC data. Part II. A formal model

Academic Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 427-437

  Dorfman, Donald D ^a,b   Berbaum, Kevin S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b The University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision theory; Diagnostic radiology; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HISTOGRAM; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIGNAL PROCESSING; THEORY;

EID: 0034041386     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80383-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Brandser EA. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data. I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:420-426.
2. Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals: rating method data. J Math Psychol 1969; 6:487-496.
3. Dorfman DD. RSCORE II. In: Swets JA, Pickett RM, eds. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982; 212-232.
4. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS. Degeneracy and discrete ROC rating data. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:907-915.
5. Pan X, Metz CE. The proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:380-389.
6. Metz CE, Pan X. Proper binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol 1999; 43:1-33.
7. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE, Lenth RV, Hanley JA, Abu-Dagga H. Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: the bigamma model. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:138-149.
8. Brandser EA, Berbaum KS, Dorfman DD, et al. Evaluation of ankle fractures: two-view versus three-view radiographic series and comparison of two-view combinations. AJR (in press).
9. Clark CR, Bonfiglio M. Orthopaedics: essentials of diagnosis and treatment. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1994.
10. Swets JA, Tanner WP Jr, Birdsall TG. Decision processes in perception. Psychol Rev 1961; 68:301-340.
11. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley, 1966; 21-23,60, 127-136.
12. Dorfman DD, Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory: a direct solution. Psychometrika 1968; 33: 117-124.
13. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982.
14. Blackwell HR. Psychological thresholds: experimental studies of methods of measurement. Bull Eng Res Inst U Mich 1953; No. 36:14-18.
15. Blackwell HR. Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. J Opt Soc Am 1963; 53:129-160.
16. Swets JA. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. Psych Bull 1986; 99:100-117.
17. Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenough DJ. Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. Radiology 1975; 116:533-538.
18. Swensson RG. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. Med Phys 1996; 23:1709-1725.
19. Seltzer SE, Swensson RG, Nawfel RD, Lentini JF, Kazda I, Judy PF. Visualization and detection: localization on computed tomographic images. Invest Radiol 1991; 26:285-294.
20. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data. III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:438-447.
21. Everitt BS, Hand DJ. Finite mixture distributions. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall, 1981; 27-30.