Sticks and carrots: encouraging open science at its source

Geo: Geography and Environment

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 12-16

  Leonelli, Sabina ^a   Spichtinger, Daniel ^b   Prainsack, Barbara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

incentives; open access; open science; research cultures; research policy

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; INCENTIVE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE;

EID: 84963987406     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20544049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/geo2.2     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Aronova E forthcoming Geophysical datascapes: the world data centers and the cold war political economy of data exchange, 1950s–1960s Osiris
2. Aronova E, Baker K and Oreskes N 2010 Big science and big data in biology: from the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957–Present Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 183–224.
3. Bourne B 2014 Ten weeks as ADDS. Pebourne Blog (http://pebourne.wordpress.com/2014/05/17/ten-weeks-as-adds/) Accessed 10 November 2014
4. Caball M, Louca L, Pochet R, Spichtinger D and Prainsack B 2013 The best Open Access policies put researchers in charge Impact of Social Science blog (http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/12/18/good-open-access-policies-put-researchers-in-charge/) Accessed 10 November 2014
5. Dockser Marcus A and Weaver C 2012 Heart gadgets test privacy law limits The Wall Street Journal online (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970203937004578078820874744076?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052970203937004578078820874744076.html) Accessed 10 November 2014
6. Elwood S, Goodchild M and Sui D 2012 Researching volunteered geographic information: spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice Annals of the Association of American Geographers 10 2571–90
7. European Commission 2012 Recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information (http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf) Accessed 12 November 2014
8. European Commission 2013a Guidelines on Open Access to scientific publications and research data in Horizon 2020 (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf) Accessed 20 November 2014
9. European Commission 2013b Societal challenges of Horizon 2020 (http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/societal-challenges) Accessed 23 November 2014
10. European Commission 2014 Background document: Public Consultation ‘Science 2.0': Science in Transition. Directorates-General for Research and Innovation (RTD) and Communications Networks, content and Technology (CONNECT) (http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science-2.0/background.pdf) Accessed 23 November 2014
11. Kitchin R 2013 Big data and human geography: opportunities, challenges and risks Dialogues in Human Geography 3 262–7
12. Kotarski R, Reilly S, Schrimpf S, Smit E and Walshe K 2012 Report on best practices for citability of data and on evolving roles in scholarly communication Executive summary ODE Project (www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/08/ODE-ExecutiveSummary-ReportBestPracticesCitabilityDataEvolvingRolesScholarlyCommunication.pdf) Accessed 23 November 2014
13. Leonelli S 2013 Why the current insistence on Open Access to scientific data? Big data, knowledge production and the political economy of contemporary biology Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 33 6–11
14. Leonelli S and Ankeny R A 2012 Re-thinking organisms: the epistemic impact of databases on model organism biology Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 29–36
15. Levin N, Weckowska D, Castle D, Dupre J and Leonelli S manuscript under review How do scientists understand openness? Assessing the impact of UK Open Science Policies on biological research
16. Lunshof J E, Church G M and Prainsack B 2014 Raw personal data: providing access Science 343 373–4
17. Martin D, Kitchin R and Perkins C 2009 Re-thinking maps Routledge, New York
18. Nature Special 2013 Challenges in irreproducible research (www.nature.com/nature/focus/reproducibility/index.html) Accessed 10 November 2014
19. OceanDataPortal 2014 (www.oceandataportal.org) Accessed 19 November 2014
20. Office of Science and Technology Policy 2013 Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research (www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf) Accessed 10 November 2014
21. Piwowar H A, Day R S and Fridsma D B 2007 Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate PloS ONE 2 e308
22. Poline J B, Breeze J L, Ghosh S, Gorgolewski K, Halchenko Y O, Hanke M, Haselgrove C, Helmer K G, Keator D B, Marcus D S, Poldrack R A, Schwartz Y, Ashburner J and Kennedy D Nx 2012 Data sharing in neuroimaging research Frontiers in neuroinformatics 6 doi: 10.3389/fninf.2012.00009
23. Royal Society 2012 Science as an open enterprise (http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/) Accessed 10 November 2014
24. Schäfer A, Pampel H, Pfeiffenberger H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Tissari S, Darby R, Giaretta K, Giaretta D, Gitmans K, Helin H, Lambert S, Mele S, Reilly S, Ruiz S, Sandberg M, Schallier W, Schrimpf S, Smit E, Wilkinson M and Wilson M 2011 Baseline Report on Drivers and Barriers in Data Sharing. Opportunities for data exchange (www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/11/ODE-WP3-DEL-0002-1_0_public_final.pdf) Accessed 10 November 2014
25. Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu U A, Wu L, Read E, Manoff M and Frame M 2011 Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions PloS ONE 6 e21101
26. The Long Term Ecological Research Network 2014 (www.lternet.edu) Accessed 17 November 2014