Peer assessment: Encouraging reflection on interface design

Proceedings - 23rd Australasian Computer Science Conference, ACSC 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 196-203

  Purchase, H C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

DESIGN ISSUES; EXPOSED TO; INTERFACE DESIGNS; LEARNING ACTIVITY; MARKING CRITERIA; PEER ASSESSMENT; RANKING SYSTEM;

DESIGN;

EID: 84963787954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ACSC.2000.824403     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. S. Earl. Staff and peer assessment - measuring an individual's contribution to group performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 11(1), 1986.
2. K. Kwan and R. Leung. Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 21(3), 1996.
3. P. Orsmond, S. Merry, and K. Reiling. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 21(3), 1996.
4. M. Searby and T. Ewers. An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the school of music, kingston university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education., 22(4), 1997.
5. L. Stainer. Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: a modeule evaluation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education., 21(1), 1997.