Closed-loop neuroscience and non-invasive brain stimulation: A tale of two loops

Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue APR, 2016, Pages

  Zrenner, Christoph ^a   Belardinelli, Paolo ^a   Müller Dahlhaus, Florian ^a   Ziemann, Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Closed loop; EEG; NIBS; Non invasive brain stimulation; TMS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLOSED LOOP NEUROSCIENCE; DEFAULT MODE NETWORK; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HIPPOCAMPUS THETA RHYTHM; HUMAN; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROREHABILITATION; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

EID: 84963728291     PISSN: 16625102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00092     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., and Freeston, I. L. (1985). Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 325, 1106-1107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4
2. Berényi, A., Belluscio, M., Mao, D., and Buzsáki, G. (2012). Closed-loop control of epilepsy by transcranial electrical stimulation. Science 337, 735-737. doi: 10.1126/science.1223154
3. Bergmann, T. O., Mölle, M., Schmidt, M. A., Lindner, C., Marshall, L., Born, J., et al. (2012). EEG-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals rapid shifts in motor cortical excitability during the human sleep slow oscillation. J. Neurosci. 32, 243-253. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4792-11.2012
4. Bonato, C., Miniussi, C., and Rossini, P. M. (2006). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin. Neurophysiol.117, 1699-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.006
5. Buch, E., Weber, C., Cohen, L. G., Braun, C., Dimyan, M. A., Ard, T., et al. (2008). Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 39, 910-917. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313
6. Buetefisch, C., Heger, R., Schicks, W., Seitz, R., and Netz, J. (2011). Hebbian-type stimulation during robot-assisted training in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25, 645-655. doi: 10.1177/1545968311402507
7. Bundy, D. T., Wronkiewicz, M., Sharma, M., Moran, D. W., Corbetta, M., and Leuthardt, E. C. (2012). Using ipsilateral motor signals in the unaffected cerebral hemisphere as a signal platform for brain-computer interfaces in hemiplegic stroke survivors. J. Neural Eng. 9:036011. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036011
8. Buzsáki, G., and Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks.Science 304, 1926-1929. doi: 10.1126/science.1099745
9. Chao, Z. C., Bakkum, D. J., and Potter, S. M. (2008). Shaping embodied neural networks for adaptive goal-directed behavior. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4:e1000042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000042
10. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127-138. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787
11. Gharabaghi, A., Kraus, D., Leão, M. T., Spüler, M., Walter, A., Bogdan, M., et al. (2014). Coupling brain-machine interfaces with cortical stimulation for brain-state dependent stimulation: enhancing motor cortex excitability for neurorehabilitation.Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:122. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00122
12. Grefkes, C., and Ward, N. S. (2013). Cortical reorganization after stroke how much and how functional? Neuroscientist 20, 56-70. doi: 10.1177/1073858413491147
13. Grosenick, L., Marshel, J. H., and Deisseroth, K. (2015). Closed-loop and activity-guided optogenetic control. Neuron 86, 106-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.034
14. Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature406, 147-150. doi: 10.1038/35018000
15. Hamada, M., Murase, N., Hasan, A., Balaratnam, M., and Rothwell, J. C. (2013). The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb. Cortex23, 1593-1605. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs147
16. Herron, J., Denison, T., and Chizeck, H. J. (2015). "Closed-loop DBS with movement intention," in 7th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), Montpellier, France.
17. Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., and Carter, O. (2015). Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review.Neuropsychologia 66C, 213-236. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021
18. Huerta, P. T., and Lisman, J. E. (1993). Heightened synaptic plasticity of hippocampal CA1 neurons during a cholinergically induced rhythmic state. Nature 364, 723-725. doi: 10.1038/364723a0
19. Huerta, P. T., and Lisman, J. E. (1995). Bidirectional synaptic plasticity induced by a single burst during cholinergic theta oscillation in CA1 in vitro. Neuron 15, 1053-1063. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90094-2
20. Ilmoniemi, R. J., and Kicić, D. (2010). Methodology for combined TMS and EEG.Brain Topogr. 22, 233-248. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0123-4
21. Ilmoniemi, R. J., Virtanen, J., Ruohonen, J., Karhu, J., Aronen, H. J., Näätänen, R., et al. (1997). Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 8, 3537-3540. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199711100-00024
22. Keren, H., and Marom, S. (2014). Controlling neural network responsiveness: tradeoffs and constraints. Front. Neuroeng. 7:11. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00011
23. Kraus, D., Naros, G., Bauer, R., Leão, M. T., Ziemann, U., and Gharabaghi, A. (2016). Brain-robot interface driven plasticity: distributed modulation of corticospinal excitability. Neuroimage 125, 522-532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.074
24. Lefaucheur, J. P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., et al. (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021
25. Li, L. M., Uehara, K., and Hanakawa, T. (2015). The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9:181. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00181
26. Little, S., and Brown, P. (2012). What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease? Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1265, 9-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06650.x
27. Little, S., Pogosyan, A., Neal, S., Zavala, B., Zrinzo, L., Hariz, M., et al. (2013). Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. Ann. Neurol. 74, 449-457. doi: 10.1002/ana.23951
28. Litvak, V., Komssi, S., Scherg, M., Hoechstetter, K., Classen, J., Zaaroor, M., et al. (2007). Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex.Neuroimage 37, 56-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.015
29. López-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Río-Rodríguez, D., and Fernández-Del-Olmo, M. (2014). Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 7, 372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004
30. López-Alonso, V., Fernández-Del-Olmo, M., Costantini, A., Gonzalez-Henriquez, J. J., and Cheeran, B. (2015). Intra-individual variability in the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 2342-2347. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.022
31. Marom, S., and Wallach, A. (2011). Relational dynamics in perception: impacts on trial-to-trial variation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 5:16. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00016
32. Müller-Dahlhaus, F., and Vlachos, A. (2013). Unraveling the cellular and molecular mechanisms of repetitive magnetic stimulation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 6:50. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2013.00050
33. Müller-Dahlhaus, F., and Ziemann, U. (2015). Metaplasticity in human cortex.Neuroscientist 21, 185-202. doi: 10.1177/1073858414526645
34. Mutanen, T., Nieminen, J. O., and Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2013). TMS-evoked changes in brain-state dynamics quantified by using EEG data. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00155
35. Ngo, H.-V. V., Martinetz, T., Born, J., and Mölle, M. (2013). Auditory closed-loop stimulation of the sleep slow oscillation enhances memory. Neuron 78, 545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.006
36. Pfurtscheller, G., and Neuper, C. (2009). "Dynamics of sensorimotor oscillations in a motor task," in Brain-Computer Interfaces, eds B. Graimann, G. Pfurtscheller, and B. Allison (Springer: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 47-64.
37. Potter, S. M., El Hady, A., and Fetz, E. E. (2014). Closed-loop neuroscience and neuroengineering. Front. Neural Circuits 8:115. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00115
38. Ramos-Murguialday, A., Broetz, D., Rea, M., Läer, L., Yilmaz, Ö., Brasil, F. L., et al. (2013). Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study.Ann. Neurol. 74, 100-108. doi: 10.1002/ana.23879
39. Ridding, M. C., and Ziemann, U. (2010). Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J. Physiol. 588, 2291-2304. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.190314
40. Rossini, P., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., et al. (2015). Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an IFCN Committee. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
41. Rothwell, J. C., Thompson, P. D., Day, B. L., Boyd, S., and Marsden, C. D. (1991). Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Exp. Physiol. 76, 159-200. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1991.sp003485
42. Shahaf, G., and Marom, S. (2001). Learning in networks of cortical neurons. J. Neurosci. 21, 8782-8788.
43. Siegle, J. H., and Wilson, M. A. (2014). Enhancement of encoding and retrieval functions through theta phase-specific manipulation of hippocampus. Elife 3:e03061. doi: 10.7554/elife.03061
44. Thabit, M. N., Ueki, Y., Koganemaru, S., Fawi, G., Fukuyama, H., and Mima, T. (2010). Movement-related cortical stimulation can induce human motor plasticity. J. Neurosci. 30, 11529-11536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1829-10.2010
45. Veniero, D., Bortoletto, M., and Miniussi, C. (2009). TMS-EEG co-registration: on TMS-induced artifact. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1392-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.023
46. Virtanen, J., Ruohonen, J., Näätänen, R., and Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1999). Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 322-326. doi: 10.1007/bf02513307
47. Wallach, A. (2014). The response clamp: functional characterization of neural systems using closed-loop control. Front. Neural Circuits 7:5. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00005
48. Wiethoff, S., Hamada, M., and Rothwell, J. C. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 7, 468-475. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
49. Ziemann, U., Reis, J., Schwenkreis, P., Rosanova, M., Strafella, A., Badawy, R., et al. (2015). TMS and drugs revisited 2014. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 1847-1868. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.028
50. Zrenner, C., Eytan, D., Wallach, A., Thier, P., and Marom, S. (2010). A generic framework for real-time multi-channel neuronal signal analysis, telemetry control and sub-millisecond latency feedback generation. Front. Neurosci. 4:173. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2010.00173