Social science contributions compared in synthetic biology and nanotechnology

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 143-148

  Shapira, Philip ^a,b,c   Youtie, Jan ^c   Li, Yin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

knowledge sources; nanotechnology; social science publications; societal implications; synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963696612     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.1002123     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Calvert, J., and P., Martin. 2009. “The Role of Social Scientists in Synthetic Biology.” EMBO Reports 10 (3): 201–204. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.15
2. Fisher, E. 2005. “Lessons Learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Program (ELSI): Planning Societal Implications Research for the National Nanotechnology Program.” Technology in Society 27 (3): 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.006
3. Lee, R. G., 2012. “Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation.” Transnational Environmental Law 1 (1): 105–117. doi: 10.1017/S2047102511000136
4. Roco, M. C., Harthorn, B., Guston, D., and P., Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9): 3557–3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
5. Shapira, P., J., Youtie, and A. L., Porter. 2010. “The Emergence of Social Science Research on Nanotechnology.” Scientometrics 85 (2): 595–611. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0204-x
6. Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R., Owen, J., Bessant, and M., Heintz, 53–74. Chichester: Wiley.
7. Youtie, J., P., Shapira, and Y., Li. 2014. A Comparison of Social Science Research in Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology. Working Paper. Atlanta: Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.