The loss of biodiversity conservation in EU research programmes: Thematic shifts in biodiversity wording in the environment themes of EU research programmes FP7 and Horizon 2020

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 30, Issue , 2016, Pages 12-18

  Admiraal, J F ^a   Musters, C J M ^a   de Snoo, G R ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Economic valuation; Ecosystem services; Environmental policy; European Commission

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN UNION; RESEARCH PROGRAM;

EUROPE;

EID: 84963694351     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, W.M., The value of valuing nature. Nature 346 (2014), 549–551.
2. Armsworth, P.R., Chan, K.M.A., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T.H., et al. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology 21 (2007), 1383–1384.
3. Bartkowski, B., Lienhoop, N., Hansjürgens, B., Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: a critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity. Ecological Economics 113 (2015), 1–14.
4. BiodivERsA (2013). BiodivERsA database. Belgian Biodiversity Platform (v20131211) (accessed at http://www.biodiversa.org/database).
5. BISE (2011). Biodiversity Data Center, available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/eu-research-projects-on-biodiversity/projects/research/view/ (accessed October 2015).
6. Boitani, L., Sutherland, W.J., Conservation in Europe as a model for emerging conservation issues globally. Conservation Biology, 2015, 10.1111/cobi.12530.
7. Butler, W.F., Acott, T.G., An inquiry concerning the acceptance of intrinsic value theories of nature. Environmental Values 16 (2007), 149–168.
8. Chan, K.M.A., Shaw, M.R., Cameron, D.R., Underwood, E.C., Daily, G.C., Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology, 4(11), 2006, e379, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
9. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997), 253–260.
10. De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., Boumans, R.M.J., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41 (2002), 393–408.
11. EC (2015). Mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/mid_term_review_summary.pdf (accessed November 2015).
12. EEA (2015). State of nature in the EU; results from reporting under the nature directives 2007–2012. EEA (European Environment Agency), available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu (accessed June 2015).
13. EP resolution (2014). Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/EP_resolution_april2012.pdf (accessed June 2015).
14. EU (2015). Special Eurobarometer 436 Attitudes of Europeans towards biodiversity, 10.2779/832333.
15. Gambette, P., Eggermont, H., Le Roux, X., Temporal and geographical trends in the type of biodiversity research funded on a competitive basis in European countries. 2014, BiodivERsA, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité Paris, France Available from: http://www.biodiversa.org/8 (accessed June 2015).
16. Gomez-Baggethun, E., Ruiz-Perez, M., Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography 35 (2011), 613–628.
17. Gould, R.K., Klain, S.C., Ardoin, N.M., Satterfield, T., Woodside, U., Hannahs, N., et al. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conservation Biology 29 (2014), 575–586.
18. Hodge, I., Hauck, J., Bonn, A., The alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies in the European Union. Conservation Biology, 2015, 10.1111/cobi.12531.
19. Isbell, F., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Loreau, M., The biodiversity-dependent ecosystem service debt. Ecology Letters 18 (2015), 119–134.
20. Kati, V., Hovardas, T., Dieterich, M., Ibisch, P.L., Mihok, B., Selva, N., The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conservation Biology 29 (2015), 260–270.
21. Laurila-Pant, M., Lehikoinen, A., Uusitalo, L., Venesjärvi, R., How to value biodiversity in environmental management?. Ecological Indicators 55 (2015), 1–11.
22. Losey, J.E., Vaughan, M., The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56 (2006), 311–323.
23. Mace, G.M., Whose conservation?. Science, 345, 2014, 1558.
24. Mace, G.M., Norris, K., Fitter, A.H., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27 (2012), 19–1926.
25. Matei, S., Henckel, L., Gauthier, C.A., Le Roux, X., Biodiversity within the Environment Theme of the 7th Framework Programme (2007–2010): Funding Amounts, Success Rates, Temporal Trends & Comparisons Between Countries, BiodivERsA, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité Paris France, 2011 available from: http://www.biodiversa.org/359 (accessed June 2015).
26. McCauley, D.J., Selling out on nature. Nature 443 (2006), 27–28.
27. Norgaard, R.B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69 (2010), 1219–1227.
28. Nunes, P.A.L.D., Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense?. Ecological Economics 39 (2001), 203–222.
29. Pearce, D., Do we really care about Biodiversity?. Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (2007), 313–333.
30. Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F., Bunker, D.E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., et al. Ecosystem services for 2020. Science 330 (2010), 323–324.
31. Pimentel, D., Wilen, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J., et al. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. Bioscience 47 (1997), 747–757.
32. Ridder, B., Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 17 (2008), 781–790.
33. Rose, D.C., The case for policy-relevant conservation science. Conservation Biology 29 (2014), 748–754.
34. Schröter, M., Van der Zanden, E.H., Van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., De Groot, R.S., et al. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters 7 (2014), 514–523.
35. Stemler, S., An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 2001 Available from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17 (accessed November 2015).
36. TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB, available from: http://www.unep.org/pdf/LinkClick.pdf (accessed June 2015).
37. Tittensor, D.P., Walpole, M., Hill, S.L.L., Boyce, D.G., Britten, G.L., Burgess, N.D., et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science, 346, 2014, 6206.
38. Van den Born, R.J.G., Rethinking nature: visions of nature of a Dutch public. Environmental Values 17 (2008), 83–109.
39. Wood, P., Biodiversity as the source of biological resources: a new look at biodiversity values. Environmental Values 6 (1997), 251–268.