A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets

Science

Volumn 346, Issue 6206, 2014, Pages 241-244

  Tittensor, Derek P ^a,b   Walpole, Matt ^a   Hill, Samantha L L ^a   Boyce, Daniel G ^c,d   Britten, Gregory L ^b   Burgess, Neil D ^a,e   Butchart, Stuart H M ^f   Leadley, Paul W ^g   Regan, Eugenie C ^a   Alkemade, Rob ^h   Baumung, Roswitha ⁱ   Bellard, Céline ^g   Bouwman, Lex ^h,j   Bowles Newark, Nadine J ^a   Chenery, Anna M ^a   Cheung, William W L ^k   Christensen, Villy ^k   Cooper, H David ^l   Crowther, Annabel R ^a   Dixon, Matthew J R ^a   Galli, Alessandro ^m   Gaveau, Valérie ⁿ   Gregory, Richard D ^o   Gutierrez, Nicolas L ^p   Hirsch, Tim L ^q   Höft, Robert ^l   Januchowski Hartley, Stephanie R ^r   Karmann, Marion ^s   Krug, Cornelia B ^g,t   Leverington, Fiona J ^u   Loh, Jonathan ^v   Lojenga, Rik Kutsch ^w   Malsch, Kelly ^a   Marques, Alexandra ^x,y   Morgan, David H W ^z   Mumby, Peter J ^u   Newbold, Tim ^a   Noonan Mooney, Kieran ^l   Pagad, Shyama N ^aa   Parks, Bradley C ^ab   Pereira, Henrique M ^x,y   Robertson, Tim ^q   Rondinini, Carlo ^ac   Santini, Luca ^ac   Scharlemann, Jörn P W ^a,ad   Schindler, Stefan ^ae,af   Sumaila, U Rashid ^k   Teh, Louise S L ^k   Van Kolck, Jennifer ^h   Visconti, Piero ^ag   Ye, Yimin ⁱ   more..

^a UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d BEDFORD INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^f BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL   (United Kingdom)

^g CNRS   (France)

^h PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS   (Italy)

^j UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^l Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity   (Canada)

^m Global Footprint Network   (Switzerland)

ⁿ OECD   (France)

^o RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^p Science and Standards Department   (United Kingdom)

^q Universitetsparken 2   (Denmark)

^r UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^s Forest Stewardship Council International Center   (Germany)

^t DIVERSITAS   (France)

^u UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^v ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^w Union for Ethical BioTrade   (Netherlands)

^x GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^y MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^z Maison Internationale de l'Environnement ^*  (Switzerland)

^aa UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^ab The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^ac SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^ae ENVIRONMENT AGENCY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^af UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^ag MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84907822157     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1257484     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. United Nations, Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992).
2. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), "Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity" (Earthscan, London, 2003).
3. B. Worm et al., Science 325, 578-585 (2009).
4. S. H. M. Butchart et al., Science 328, 1164-1168 (2010).
5. SCBD, "Global Biodiversity Outlook 3" (Montreal, 2010).
6. UNEP, CBD, "UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2 2010" (2010).
7. T. H. Sparks et al., Oryx 45, 411-419 (2011).
8. See supplementary materials on Science Online.
9. UNEP, CBD, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/XI/3 2012 (2012).
10. J. Durbin, S. J. Koopman, Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001).
11. K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, New York, ed. 2, 2002).
12. CBD, Programme of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA), https://www.cbd.int/protected/implementation/actionplans/ (2013).
13. D. P. McCarthy et al., Science 338, 946-949 (2012).
14. Furthermore, the ability of statistical models to react to recent changes in indicator trends will vary depending on, among other things, the length of the time series, the noise in the data, and the magnitude of departure from the previous trend.
15. J. M. Bullock, J. Aronson, A. C. Newton, R. F. Pywell, J. M. Rey-Benayas, Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 541-549 (2011).
16. J. P. Metzger et al., Biol. Conserv. 142, 1166-1177 (2009).
17. M. Di Marco et al., Conserv. Biol. 28, 1109-1118 (2014).
18. D. Nepstad et al., Science 344, 1118-1123 (2014).
19. M. Walpole et al., Science 325, 1503-1504 (2009).
20. H. M. Pereira, L. M. Navarro, I. S. Martins, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 25-50 (2012).
21. It is also possible that the response, pressure, and state indicator framework is not tracking factors that are causally linked (7); use of this framework does not imply joined-up indicators.
22. M. Hoffmann et al., Science 330, 1503-1509 (2010).
23. S. L. Pimm et al., Science 344, 1246752 (2014).
24. B. J. Cardinale et al., Nature 486, 59-67 (2012).