Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer tumor vascular parameters by using perfusion CT: Influence of tumor region of interest

Radiology

Volumn 247, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 726-732

  Goh, Vicky ^a   Halligan, Steve ^b   Gharpuray, Anita ^a,c   Wellsted, David ^d   Sundin, Josefin ^d   Bartram, Clive I ^c  

^a MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD VOLUME; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFORMED CONSENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERMEABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TUMOR VOLUME; ADENOCARCINOMA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPAMIDOL; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE MEGLUMINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 45149121978     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2473070414     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Miles KA, Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 2003;76:220-231.
2. Goh V, Padhani AR, Rasheed S. Functional imaging of colorectal cancer angiogenesis. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:245-255.
3. Willett CG, Boucher Y, Di Tomaso E, et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat Med 2004;10:145-147.
4. Ng QS, Goh V, Milner J, et al. Effect of nitric oxide synthesis on tumour blood volume and vascular activity: a phase I study. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:111-118.
5. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hamberg LM, et al. Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. Radiology 2005;234:785-792.
6. Yi CA, Lee KS, Kim EA, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic enhanced multi-detector row CT study and comparison with vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density. Radiology 2004;233:191-199.
7. Wang JH, Min PQ, Wang PJ, et al. Dynamic CT evaluation of tumor vascularity in renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1423-1430.
8. Goh V, Halligan S, Hugill JA, Bassett P, Bartram CI. Quantitative assessment of colorectal cancer perfusion using MDCT: inter-and intraobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:225-231.
9. Ng QS, Goh V, Fichte H, et al. Lung cancer perfusion at multi- detector row CT: reproducibility of whole tumor quantitative measurements. Radiology 2006;239:547-553.
10. Fiorella D, Heiserman J, Prenger E, Partovi S. Assessment of the reproducibility of post-processing dynamic CT perfusion data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:97-107.
11. Sanelli PC, Nicola G, Tsiouris AJ, et al. Reproducibility of postprocessing of quantitative CT perfusion maps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:213-218.
12. Konerding MA, Fait E, Gaumann A. 3D microvascular architecture of pre-cancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the colon. Br J Cancer 2001;84:1354-1362.
13. Stewart EE, Chen X, Hadway J, Lee TY. Correlation between hepatic tumor blood flow and glucose utilization in a rabbit tumor model. Radiology 2006;239:740-750.
14. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:431-438.
15. Liney GP, Gibbs P, Hayes C, Leach MO, Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differentiation of breast tumors: user-defined versus semi-automated region-of-interest analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:945-949.
16. Li F, Arimura H, Suzuki K, et al. Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology 2005;237:684-690.
17. Burling D, Halligan S, Roddie ME, et al. Computed tomography colonography: automated diameter and volume measurement of colonic polyps compared with a manual technique - in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:387-393.
18. Sanelli PC, Lev MH, Eastwood JD, Gonzalez RG, Lee TY. The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps. Acad Radiol 2004;11:1085-1092.
19. Kealey SM, Loving VA, Delong DM, Eastwood JD. User-defined vascular input function curves: influence on mean perfusion parameter values and signal-to-noise ratio. Radiology 2004;231:587-593.
20. Purdie TG, Henderson E, Lee TY. Functional CT imaging of angiogenesis in rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumor. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:3161-3175.
21. Goh V, Halligan S, Hugill JA, Bartram CI. Quantitative assessment of tissue perfusion using MDCT: comparison of colorectal cancer and skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:164-169.