The Brain’s Tendency to Bind Audiovisual Signals Is Stable but Not General

Psychological Science

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 583-591

  Odegaard, Brian ^a   Shams, Ladan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Engineering IV   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian causal inference; Bayesian priors; binding tendency; individual differences; multisensory integration; spatial localization; temporal numerosity judgments

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; JUDGMENT; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84963641723     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797616628860     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D.AlaisD.Burr (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257–262. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029
2. M.O.ErnstM.S.Banks (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433. doi:10.1038/415429a
3. J.J.FoxeS.MolholmV.A.D.BeneH.-P.FreyN.N.RussoD.BlancoL.A.. Ross (2015). Severe multisensory speech integration deficits in high-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their resolution during early adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 298–312. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht213
4. J.J.FoxeC.E.Schroeder (2005). The case for feedforward multisensory convergence during early cortical processing. NeuroReport, 16, 419–423.
5. A.A.GhazanfarC.E.Schroeder (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 278–285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008
6. N.HahnJ.J.FoxeS.Molholm (2014). Impairments of multisensory integration and cross-sensory learning as pathways to dyslexia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 384–392. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.007
7. W.D.HairstonM.T.WallaceJ.W.VaughanB.E.SteinJ.L.NorrisJ.A.Schirillo (2003). Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 20–29. doi:10.1162/089892903321107792
8. V.HarrarJ.TammamA.Pérez-BellidoA.PittJ.SteinC.Spence (2014). Multisensory integration and attention in developmental dyslexia. Current Biology, 24, 531–535. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.029
9. K.P.KördingU.BeierholmW.J.MaS.QuartzJ.B.TenenbaumL.Shams (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2(9), Article e943. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000943
10. D.B.MallickJ.F.MagnottiM.S.Beauchamp (2015). Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: Contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1–9. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0817-4
11. F.N.NewellK.J.Mitchell (2015). Multisensory integration and cross-modal learning in synaesthesia: A unifying model. Neuropsychologia. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.026
12. C.V.PariseC.Spence (2009). “When birds of a feather flock together”: Synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS ONE, 4(5), Article e5664. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005664
13. C.V.PariseC.SpenceM.O.Ernst (2012). When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. Current Biology, 22, 46–49. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.039
14. T.RoheU.Noppeney (2015a). Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS Biology, 13(2), Article e1002073. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073
15. T.RoheU.Noppeney (2015b). Sensory reliability shapes perceptual inference via two mechanisms. Journal of Vision, 15(5), Article 22. doi:10.1167/15.5.22
16. L.ShamsU.R.Beierholm (2010). Causal inference in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 425–432. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.001
17. L.ShamsY.KamitaniS.Shimojo (2000). Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788. doi:10.1038/35048669
18. L.ShamsW.J.MaU.Beierholm (2005). Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept. NeuroReport, 16, 1923–1927.
19. B.E.Stein (2012). The new handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. J.J.StekelenburgJ.P.MaesA.R.Van GoolM.SitskoornJ.Vroomen (2013). Deficient multisensory integration in schizophrenia: An event-related potential study. Schizophrenia Research, 147, 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.038
21. R.A.StevensonJ.K.SiemannB.C.SchneiderH.E.EberlyT.G.WoynaroskiS.M.CamarataM.T.Wallace (2014). Multisensory temporal integration in autism spectrum disorders. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 691–697. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-13.2014
22. R.A.StevensonJ.K.SiemannT.G.WoynaroskiB.C.SchneiderH.E.EberlyS.M.CamarataM.T.Wallace (2014). Evidence for diminished multisensory integration in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 12, 3161–3167. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2179-6
23. R.A.StevensonM.T.Wallace (2013). Multisensory temporal integration: Task and stimulus dependencies. Experimental Brain Research, 227, 249–261. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3507-3
24. R.A.StevensonR.K.ZemtsovM.T.Wallace (2012). Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1517–1529. doi:10.1037/a0027339
25. G.R.SzycikT.F.MünteW.DilloB.MohammadiA.SamiiH.M.EmrichD.E.Dietrich (2009). Audiovisual integration of speech is disturbed in schizophrenia: An fMRI study. Schizophrenia Research, 110, 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.003
26. C.TremblayF.ChampouxB.A.BaconH.Theoret (2007). Evidence for a generic process underlying multisensory integration. Open Behavioral Science Journal, 1, 1–4. doi:10.2174/1874230000701010001
27. M.T.WallaceR.A.Stevenson (2014). The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 64, 105–123. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.005
28. L.E.WilliamsG.A.LightD.L.BraffV.S.Ramachandran (2010). Reduced multisensory integration in patients with schizophrenia on a target detection task. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3128–3136. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.028
29. D.R.WoznyU.R.BeierholmL.Shams (2010). Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(8), Article e1000871. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000871