Something Old, Something New: Combining Mechanisms During Language Acquisition

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 130-134

  Toro, Juan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

comparative cognition; perceptual bias; phonology; speech perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962758012     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721416629645     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. M.HauserN.ChomskyT.Fitch (2002). (See References). An article that explores what aspects of the language faculty might be found in other species and puts forward the influential hypothesis that only recursion is uniquely human in language.
2. J.R.IversenA.D.PatelK.Ohgushi (2008). (See References). A study demonstrating different grouping patterns across speakers of English and Japanese.
3. M.NesporI.Vogel (2008). (See References). A general and accessible book describing the correlation between prosody and syntactic structures.
4. J.M.ToroM.NesporJ.MehlerL.Bonatti (2008). (See References). An empirical work on the functional differences between consonants and vowels.
5. M.Yip (2006). (See References). A comprehensible review of several studies exploring the extent to which some phonological features might be based on mechanisms shared across species.
6. S.Benavides-VarelaJ.HochmannF.MacagnoM.NesporJ.Mehler (2012). Newborn’s brain activity signals the origin of word memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 17908–17913.
7. A.BhataraN.Boll-AvetisvanA.UngerT.NazziB.Höhle (2013). Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 3828–3843.
8. R.BionS.Benavides-VarelaM.Nespor (2011). Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants’ and adults’ segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech, 54, 123–140.
9. T.Bolton (1894). Rhythm. The American Journal of Psychology, 6, 145–238.
10. L.BonattiM.PeñaM.NesporJ.Mehler (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459.
11. C.BouchonC.FlocciaT.FuxM.Adda-DeckerT.Nazzi (2015). Call me Alix, not Elix: Vowels are more important than consonants in own-name recognition at 5 month. Developmental Science, 18, 587–598.
12. A.CutlerN.Sebastián-GallésO.Soler-VilageliuB.van Ooijen (2000). Constrains of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28, 746–755.
13. D.de la MoraM.NesporJ.M.Toro (2013). Do humans and non-human animals share the grouping principles of the Iambic–Trochaic Law?Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 92–100.
14. D.de la MoraJ.M.Toro (2013). Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal. Cognition, 126, 307–312.
15. A.DoupeP.Kuhl (1999). Birdsong and human speech: Common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567–631.
16. A.EndressM.NesporJ.Mehler (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 348–353.
17. T.Fitch (2005). The evolution of language: A comparative review. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 193–230.
18. M.HauserN.ChomskyT.Fitch (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science, 298, 1569–1579.
19. M.HauserE.NewportR.Aslin (2001). Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: Statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78, B53–B64.
20. J.F.HayR.Diehl (2007). Perception of rhythmic grouping: Testing the Iambic/Trochaic Law. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 113–122.
21. J.F.HayJ.R.Saffran (2012). Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning. Infancy, 17, 610–641.
22. J.HochmannS.Benavides-VarelaM.NesporJ.Mehler (2011). Consonants and vowels: Different roles in early language acquisition. Developmental Science, 14, 1445–1458.
23. J.R.IversenA.D.PatelK.Ohgushi (2008). Perception of rhythmic grouping depends on auditory experience. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 2263–2271.
24. P.KuhlJ.Miller (1975). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science, 190, 69–72.
25. T.Nazzi (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98, 13–30.
26. M.NesporM.ShuklaR.van de VijverC.AvesaniH.SchraudolfC.Donati (2008). Different phrasal prominence realizations in VO and OV languages. Lingue e Linguaggio, 2, 1–29.
27. M.NesporI.Vogel (2008). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
28. B.NewV.AraujoT.Nazzi (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223–1227.
29. E.NewportM.HauserG.SpaepenR.Aslin (2004). Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a nonhuman primate. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 85–117.
30. M.PeñaR.BionM.Nespor (2011). How modality specific is the Iambic–Trochaic Law? Evidence from vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1199–1208.
31. F.PonsJ.M.Toro (2010). Structural generalizations over consonants and vowels in 11-month-old infants. Cognition, 116, 361–367.
32. F.RamusM.HauserC.MillerD.MorrisJ.Mehler (2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349–351.
33. M.SpieringsC.ten Cate (2014). Zebra finches are sensitive to prosodic features of human speech. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, Article 20140480. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0480
34. J.M.ToroM.Nespor (2015). Experience-dependent emergence of a grouping bias. Biology Letters, 11, Article 20150374. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0374
35. J.M.ToroM.NesporJ.MehlerL.Bonatti (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science, 19, 137–144.
36. M.Yip (2006). The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 442–446.
37. K.YoshidaJ.IversenA.PatelR.MazukaH.NitoJ.GervainJ.Werker (2010). The development of perceptual grouping biases in infancy: A Japanese–English cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 115, 356–361.