Journal impact and proximity: An assessment using bibliographic features

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 802-817

  Ni, Chaoqun ^a   Shaw, Debora ^a   Lind, Sean M ^b   Ding, Ying ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC; CO-WORD ANALYSIS; DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATIONS; EDITORIAL BOARD; IMPACT FACTOR; JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS; LIBRARY SCIENCE; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE; TEXT PROCESSING;

LINEAR REGRESSION;

EID: 84876665615     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22778     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J.A., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact:Acomparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1419-1440. (Pubitemid 41050716)
2. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255. (Pubitemid 36121885)
3. Bornmann, L., Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H.D. (2011). The effect of a twostage publication process on the journal impact factor: A case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Scientometrics, 86(1), 93-97.
4. Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2380-2404. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21419
5. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. (Pubitemid 41152144)
6. Bramm, R.R., Moed, H.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.
7. Bricker, R. (1991). Deriving disciplinary structures: Some new methods, models, and an illustration with accounting. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(1), 27-35.
8. Carpenter, M.P., & Narin, F. (1973). Clustering of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(6), 425-436.
9. Cronin, B. (2009). A seat at the table. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2387.
10. Darmoni, S.J., Roussel, F., Benichou, J., Thirion, B., & Pinhas, N. (2002). Reading factor: A new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(3), 323-327. (Pubitemid 36763503)
11. Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987-1997. Scientometrics, 47(1), 55-73.
12. Garfield, E. (1979). Mapping the structure of science. Citation indexing: Its theory and applications in science, technology, and humanities (pp. 98-147). New York: Wiley.
13. Garfield, E. (1990). How ISI selects journals for coverage: Quantitative and qualitative considerations. Current Contents, 22, 5-13.
14. Garfield, E. (1996). Fortnightly review: How can impact factors be improved. BMJ, 313, 411.
15. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90-93. (Pubitemid 43042694)
16. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K.W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263.
17. Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C.S., Demleitner, M., & Murray, S.S. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(2), 111-128. (Pubitemid 40136259)
18. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 601-613.
19. Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011), Integrated impact indicators (I3) compared with impact factors (IFs): An alternative design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133-2146.
20. Liu, X., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Morea, Y., & De Moor, B. (2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1105-1119.
21. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (2005). Bibliometric maps of the field of science. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1534-1547.
22. McCain, K.W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 290-296.
23. Myers, R.H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed., Vol. 488). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
24. Ni, C., & Ding, Y. (2010). Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information. Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-10.
25. Peritz, B.C. (1995). On the association between journal circulation and impact factor. Journal of Information Science, 21(1), 63-67.
26. Rousseau, R. (2002). Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues. Library Trends, 50(3), 418-439.
27. Serenko, A., & Dohan, M. (2011). Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of artificial intelligence. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629-648.
28. Tijssen, R.J.W., & Van Leeuwen, T.N. (1995). On generalising scientometric journal mapping beyond ISI's journal and citation databases. Scientometrics, 33(1), 93-116.
29. Walters, W.H., & Linvill, A.C. (2011). Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1614-1628. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21569
30. Weller, K., Dröge, E., & Puschmann, C. (2011). Citation analysis in Twitter. Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within Tweets during scientific conferences. In M. Rowe,M. Stankovic, A-S. Dadzie, & M. Hardey (Eds.), Making sense of microposts (#MSM2011),Workshop at the Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2011), Heraklion, Greece (pp. 1-12). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
31. Wormell, I. (1998). Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: How 'international' are the international journals? Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 584-605. (Pubitemid 39122315)
32. Zhang, L., Liu, X., Janssens, F., Liang, L., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Subject clustering analysis based on ISI category classification. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 185-193.
33. Zwemer, R.L. (1970). Identification of journal characteristics useful in improving input and output of a retrieval system. Federation Proceedings, 29, 1595-1604.