An approach for setting evidence-based and stakeholder-informed research priorities in low-and middle-income countries;Démarche pour définir les priorités de recherche à partir d’éléments factuels et avec l’apport des parties prenantes dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire;Un enfoque para definir prioridades de investigación documentadas y comunicadas a las partes interesadas en países con ingresos bajos y medios

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 297-305

  Rehfuess, Eva A ^a   Durão, Solange ^b   Kyamanywa, Patrick ^c   Meerpohl, Joerg J ^d   Young, Taryn ^e   Rohwer, Anke ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF RWANDA   (Rwanda)

^d Cochrane Germany ^*  (Germany)

^e STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH RISK; HYPERTENSION; INFRASTRUCTURE; INJURY; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH METHOD; RISK FACTOR; ROAD TRAFFIC; STAKEHOLDER; TUBERCULOSIS;

AFRICA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL INACTIVITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TUBERCULOSIS; COOPERATION; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ENVIRONMENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AFRICA;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AFRICA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; ENVIRONMENT; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MENTAL HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH DESIGN; TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 84962467356     PISSN: 00429686     EISSN: 15640604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.162966     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117–71.
2. Dussault G, Franceschini MC. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4(1):12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-4-12
3. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004 Mar;19(2):69–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh009
4. Mayosi BM, Lawn JE, van Niekerk A, Bradshaw D, Abdool Karim SS, Coovadia HM; Lancet South Africa team. Health in South Africa: changes and challenges since 2009. Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2029–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61814-5
5. Uthman OA, Wiysonge CS, Ota MO, Nicol M, Hussey GD, Ndumbe PM, et al. Increasing the value of health research in the WHO African Region beyond 2015–reflecting on the past, celebrating the present and building the future: a bibliometric analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006340
6. Health Ministers endorse a research strategy for the African Region. N’Djamena: World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa; 2015. Available from: http://www.afro.who.int/en/media-centre/pressreleases/item/8181-health-ministers-endorse-a-research-strategy-for-the-african-region.html [cited 2015 Dec 4].
7. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1
8. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8
9. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):101–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6
10. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
11. Evidence-based methodologies for public health. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease prevention and Control; 2011.
12. Birbeck GL, Wiysonge CS, Mills EJ, Frenk JJ, Zhou XN, Jha P. Global health: the importance of evidence-based medicine. BMC Med. 2013;11(223):223.
13. Forland F, Rehfuess E, Klatser P, Kyamanywa P, Mayanja-Kizza H. Why evidence based approaches are urgently needed in Africa. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(10):606–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.025
14. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
15. Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority-setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:36.
16. Doyle J, Waters E, Yach D, McQueen D, De Francisco A, Stewart T, et al. Global priority-setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Mar;59(3):193–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019547
17. Schmucker C, Motschall E, Antes G, Meerpohl JJ. [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Oct;56(10):1390–7. German. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1818-y
18. Rohwer A, Booth A, Pfadenhauer L, Brereton L, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, et al. Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions. Integrate-HTA; 2016. Available from: http://www.integrate-hta.eu/downloads/ [cited 2016 Feb 9].
19. Den Teufelskreis aus Armut und Krankheit durchbrechen. Press release 075/2015, 2 June 2015. Berlin: BMBF – German Ministry of Education and Research; 2015. Available from: https://www.bmbf.de/de/den-teufelskreis-aus-armut-und-krankheit-durchbrechen-91.html [cited 2015 June 11]. German.
20. Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R, Walsh J, Stewart J. Health research priority-setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12(1):23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-23
21. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority-setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4(1):14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-4-14
22. Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J; Knowledge Transfer Study Group. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221–48, 171–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052
23. Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P. On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Q. 2003;81(3):363–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060