Advancing implementation science through measure development and evaluation: A study protocol

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Lewis, Cara C ^a,b   Weiner, Bryan J ^c   Stanick, Cameo ^d   Fischer, Sarah M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Implementation outcomes; Implementation science; Instruments; Measures; Pragmatic; Psychometric

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84937710955     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0287-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, et al. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S14-20.
2. Glasgow RE, Riley WT. Pragmatic measures: what they are and why we need them. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:237-43.
3. Lewis CC, Fischer S, Weiner BJ, Stanick C, Kim M, Martinez RG. Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implement Sci, In Press.
4. Chor KHB, Wisdom JP, Olin S-CS, Hoagwood KE, Horwitz SM. Measures for predictors of innovation adoption. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014:1-29. Epub.
5. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22.
6. Rabin BA, Purcell P, Naveed S, Moser RP, Henton MD, Proctor EK, et al. Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures. Implement Sci. 2012;7:119.
7. Hunsley J, Mash EJ. Developing criteria for evidence-based assessment: an introduction to assessments that work, Guide assess work. 2008. p. 3-14.
8. Weisz JR, Ng MY, Bearman SK. Odd couple? Reenvisioning the relation between science and practice in the dissemination-implementation era. Clin Psychol Sci. 2014;2:58-74.
9. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13-24.
10. Brown SR. Q methodology and qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 1996;6:561-7.
11. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Hardeman W, Johnston M. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:10.
12. Pill J. The Delphi method: substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1971;5:57-71.
13. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008-15.
14. Dajani JS, Sincoff MZ, Talley WK. Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1979;13:83-90.
15. Lewis C, Borntrager C, Martinez R, Weiner B, Kim M, Barwick M, et al. The society for implementation research collaboration instrument review project: a collaborative methodology to promote rigorous evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):2. under review.
16. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
17. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38:65-76.
18. Wisdom JP, Chor KHB, Hoagwood KE, Horwitz SM. Innovation adoption: a review of theories and constructs. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2014;41(4):480-502.
19. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications, vol. 26. USA: Sage Publications; 2011.
20. Viswanathan M. Measurement error and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
21. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ Res Methods. 1998;1:104-21.
22. Nunnally JC. Bernstein: psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
23. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J Appl Psychol. 1991;76:732.
24. Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Crone MR, Dusseldorp E, Presseau J. Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implement Sci. 2014;9:11.
25. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130.
26. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50:741.
27. Kerlinger Fred N, Lee Howard B: Foundations of behavioral research. N Y 2000.
28. Donnelly J, Trochim W. The research methods knowledge base. Ohio: Atomic Dog Publishing; 2007.
29. Rogers E: M. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2008.
30. Minasian LM, Carpenter WR, Weiner BJ, Anderson DE, McCaskill-Stevens W, Nelson S, et al. Translating research into evidence-based practice. Cancer. 2010;116:4440-9.
31. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus. Compr Model Program Appl Res Users Guide. 2012;5:E22.
32. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651-7.
33. Beidas RS, Stewart RE, Walsh L, Lucas S, Downey MM, Jackson K, et al. Free, brief, and validated: standardized instruments for low-resource mental health settings. Cogn Behav Pract. 2015;22(1):5-19.